The voices of dissent in Saudi Arabia have decided to speed up their "Day of Rage" by beginning their demonstrations today, March 7th, in different portions of the country leading to a five day binge of protest that will culminate in a huge protest in Riyadh on Friday.
From the story at DEBKA:
As Libyan protests morphed into bloody civil war, Saud Arabia grabbed attention as the next focus of Arab disaffection after its opposition decided to bring forward its Day of Rage demos originally scheduled for Friday, March 11 to Monday, March 7. debkafile's sources reported exclusively that demonstrations against the Saudi throne are planned for Taif, Medina and Jeddah in the west, the towns of Assir and Najran in the south, which are traditional anti-monarchical centers and locales of the Ismaili communities close to the Shia brand of Islam, and the capital Riyadh.
This was the anti-royal protest leaders' response to the ban on demonstrations issued by the Saudi Interior Ministry this week. Sunday, the ban was backed by the Council of Senior Clerics which declared demonstrations violated Islamic law and signing reform petitions "violates what God ordered."
In rescheduling the protests, the organizers had two main goals:
1. To start a slow-burning fire on the western and southern fringes of the desert kingdom, ready in four days to burst into flames in Riyadh and rouse the masses exiting the mosques after Friday prayers into forming anti-government street processions.
2. To make the coming Riyadh demonstration strong enough to pull in the rest of the kingdom including the Shiites of the oil-producing Eastern Provinces, thereby realizing the royal house's most feared bugbear, collaboration between the mainstream opposition and the Shiites.
Last Tuesday, March 1, the BBC Arabic broadcast reported that the unrest in Saudi Arabia was growing. debkafile's sources in the Gulf say that immediately following the broadcast, Saudi security and intelligence forces raised their alert to the highest level.
This is not going to go well, I fear. I believe the Saudis have had ample time to prepare for these demonstrations and it is very clear that there is no "give" in their stance regarding these public protests. At the same time, I do have some doubts about the intensity of these demonstrations compared to Egypt, Libya and Tunisia - Saudi Arabia has always had a sense of order not seen in other Arab lands. But if a few embers are sparked in just the right spots along the way, this thing could blow up, big time.
A bit off topic, but if the Saudi protests really take hold...are you ready for $5/gallon gasoline?
Saudi Day of Rage put forward to Monday, stirring market concerns
As Libyan protests morphed into bloody civil war, Saud Arabia grabbed attention as the next focus of Arab disaffection after its opposition decided to bring forward its Day of Rage demos originally scheduled for Friday, March 11 to Monday, March 7. debkafile's sources reported exclusively that demonstrations against the Saudi throne are planned for Taif, Medina and Jeddah in the west, the towns of Assir and Najran in the south, which are traditional anti-monarchical centers and locales of the Ismaili communities close to the Shia brand of Islam, and the capital Riyadh.
This was the anti-royal protest leaders' response to the ban on demonstrations issued by the Saudi Interior Ministry this week. Sunday, the ban was backed by the Council of Senior Clerics which declared demonstrations violated Islamic law and signing reform petitions "violates what God ordered."
In rescheduling the protests, the organizers had two main goals:
1. To start a slow-burning fire on the western and southern fringes of the desert kingdom, ready in four days to burst into flames in Riyadh and rouse the masses exiting the mosques after Friday prayers into forming anti-government street processions.
2. To make the coming Riyadh demonstration strong enough to pull in the rest of the kingdom including the Shiites of the oil-producing Eastern Provinces, thereby realizing the royal house's most feared bugbear, collaboration between the mainstream opposition and the Shiites.
Last Tuesday, March 1, the BBC Arabic broadcast reported that the unrest in Saudi Arabia was growing. debkafile's sources in the Gulf say that immediately following the broadcast, Saudi security and intelligence forces raised their alert to the highest level. The reason: The Saudis perceived the broadcast as a coded call to Shiites and other opposition elements to launch riots for deposing 88-year-old King Abdullah. Panic selling up to 6.8 percent of stocks resulted on the Saudi exchange. One major trader explained that the unrest in the Arab world had led investors to shift from stocks to cash.
After the BBC broadcast, the authorities took the precaution of partially shutting down the relevant Web sites to cut down participation in the demonstrations.
Saudi Arabia has 2,300,000 registered Facebook users; Bahrain, about 220,000 and Oman 160,000.
These are impressive numbers which encompass large youthful populations, especially in Saudi Arabia, among whom unemployment runs at 30-40 percent. Still, it's hard to treat these figures as a barometer for forecasting the degree of willingness to rise up and challenge the government in Riyadh.
In Saudi Arabia, especially, family-clan-tribal ties are strong and may be capable of restraining youngsters exposed to Facebook from responding actively to calls to go out on the streets, although their demands and grievances are already serving the politicians with fodder.
Saudi Arabia has three categories of politicians: liberal elements; Muslim clerics in ideological opposition to the religious establishment and government; and the Shiite minority.
Their common cause is a demand for an end to the royal family's monopoly over policy-making – i.e., a limited process toward a constitutional monarchy and a share in power for ordinary citizens.
The disturbances in Bahrain began igniting the two million Saudi Shiites of the oil-rich Eastern provinces last month: On Feb. 17, Shiites staged their first protest demonstration in the Atif region calling for the release of Shiites held without trial since 2009. A number were released three days later.
Feb. 24, saw the second Shiite demonstration in Awwamiya, a small town near Qatif; and on Feb 28, the third was held, in solidarity with the Shiites of Bahrain in the main cities of the Qatif area, including the main city of Hasha.
The latter two rallies were restrained and small, in response to the authorities' pressure on Shiite leaders to hold down the first outward manifestations of a high level of ferment in the community.
Signs of ferment surfaced in other parts of Saudi Arabia too as liberal and religious opposition figures composed their demands in readiness of the Day of Anger.
On Feb. 26, a group calling itself Jeddah Youth for Change handed out flyers to passersby in the Red Sea port city calling on them to participate in the Day of Anger demonstrations.
Prominent Saudi expats in London also took a hand.
Articles supporting the dissidents' demand for political reforms were published by two Saudi historians, Madawi al-Rasheed, a Kings College professor and scion of the Rasheed family that ruled the Najd region of Saudi Arabia prior to the Ibn Saud conquests; and May al-Yamani, daughter of the former oil minister, Mohammed Zaki al-Yamani.
The unusual level of anti-monarchical activism in the West convinced the Saudi royal family that an outside move against the throne in Riyadh is afoot, akin to the maneuver that terminated the Hosni Mubarak's presidency in Egypt and which is currently directed against Libyan ruler Muammar Qaddafi.
3 comments:
$5 a gallon gas? Ha, we'll be praying for $5 gas if the House of Saud is toppled.
Saudi Arabia is a lose/lose situation for us.
1. The current situation stays intact. The house of Saud holds on to power and continues to funnel billions in oil profits to terrorist organizations around the world. Wahhabism's biggest supporter is the inbred House of Saud. They are not our friends and were never our friends.
or
2. An uprising that topples the monarchy and we get $8 a gallon gas. Like Egypt, this could go either way. It could go hardcore Islamist or it could go Democracy. Either/or, the oil markets will be rattled until the dust settles.
Personally, I have absolutely NO problem with all these dictatorships being toppled in the middle east. Here is where I have a problem... Our president should be stepping in and sending a clear message to all these countries.
1. Do not base your new constitutions on Sharia Law.
2. Do not make a mockery of Democracy and elect groups like Hamas.
3. Do not mess with Israel or there will be big problems.
4. We will take action if the above 3 statements are not adhered to.
Obama's boldest statements so far have been things like "Don't hurt the protesters."
Hopefully Saudi protesters are sick of playing chauffeur to their women and are ready to tell the religious police to shove it. No one should be living under an absolute monarchy in the 21st century- they need a constitution.
Oil markets will be rattled either way- as they will be further if it turns out the Saudi's don't have as much oil as they let on.
Democracy will solve its own problems unless elections are suspended - as long as we're buying up the gas we have no power to tell them who to elect. Whoever is elected better be responsive to the nations problems or they'll be voted out.
Lucky to have a good 10 speed and a 5 mile commute to work.
Lysol you forgot #3. The Saudis are brutal to the shias there and the Iranians step in.
Post a Comment