Britain's three types of anti-Semitism

From Israel National News.

Britain's three types of anti-Semitism

Chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group Against Anti-Semitism in the British parliament and Labour Party member John Mann spoke at the British Limmud Conference Monday, addressing the issue of rising anti-Semitism in the UK and Europe to 3,000 young Jews.

Skyrocketing anti-Semitism in Britain "is a dangerous situation and very volatile, with very serious potential consequences," he said.

Mann addressed "three forms of anti-Semitism: Traditional anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism of the left and anti-Semitism from the Muslim community" - and vowed to fight them.

He also addressed a series of anti-Semitic remarks from Labour Party MP Gerald Kaufman, who accused Jews of using "Jewish money" to bribe the Conservative Party and also claimed that Israel is "fabricating" Palestinian terror attacks against Jews.

Mann vehemently condemned Kaufman as “a disgrace to parliament, a disgrace to the Labour Party and it’s a disgrace he is called the Father of the House." He vowed to speak with Labour Party chair Jeremy Corbyn over the issue.

Mann also visited the From Wisniew in Vilna to President St. in Jerusalem exhibit in Birmingham, which marks the achievements of former President Shimon Peres, and which was the fruit of efforts from Limmud FSU's Chaim Chesler.

During the visit, Mann spoke with Chesler and curator of the exhibition, Yoram Dori, who told Mann the story of Peres's grandfather, Zvi Meltzer, who was murdered in the Holocaust along with another 2,500 Jews during prayers in the synagogue.

Mann, who met with Peres during his visit to Israel, expressed shock over his story and said he would do everything he could in his capacity to "eradicate the effects of any kind of violence against the Jews of Britain and Europe in general."

The Anti-Semitics of Northeastern University

From Family Security Matters.

Anti-Zionism at Northeastern


The flame of anti-Zionism burns brightly at Northeastern University in Boston. On the first day of Israel Apartheid Week, Students for Justice in Palestine, a group currently on probation for violating campus policies for acts of anti-Semitism and vandalism, dispersed "evacuation" notices to students residing in the dormitories.

This was a crude attempt to reenact the history of 1948 when Arab residents in the territories were urged to vacate their homes in anticipation of the Arab war against the infant state of Israel. In its most recent form NAKBA or catastrophe (the Arab story of this period) is the justification for "the right of return" and for the attribution of Israel as a colonial state. Never mind that the narrative engages in revisionist history or that even great grandchildren now living in the West are considered Arab refugees or that Jews forced to leave Iran, Syria, Iraq, Yemen. Syria are not considered refugees. The flame burns.

Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) sent an eviction notice which said, "If you do not vacate the premise by 26 Feb. 6pm, we reserve the right to destroy all remaining belongings under Code 211.3B. We hereby release any liability for damage to any persons or effects including gross negligence. You will receive an invoice for the charges of demolition and waste removal soon."

This faux eviction notice was employed as a reminder of the past. Needless to remind the SJP herd, the one line history about Israeli occupation "for no reason other than their ethnic background" neglects to point out a war was declared in which thousands of civilians were killed and maimed. Moreover, most of "the forced evictions" were promoted by Arab military leaders who assumed residents could return when the war was won.

SJP goes on in its propagandistic diatribe to suggest that "since 1967 Israeli occupying forces have destroyed nearly 27,000 homes and other structures... resulting in the internal displacement of more than 160,000 indigenous Palestinians being injured and killed..." Of course there is a serious blind spot in this analysis: Intifada I, Intifada II, the Yom Kippur War, terrorist acts each year, the 1982 war in Lebanon, the 2001 war with Scuds landing randomly in Israeli towns, Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009) - a war to prevent missiles from being fired into population centers. Yes, Israel has defended itself and in the process innocent people have died.

But it is the Palestinian leadership in Gaza that put its own people at risk with a systematic policy of human shields. Palestinian homes are not destroyed to cleanse the region of its Arab population, as SJP argues. In fact, 20 percent of the Israeli population is Arab. Arabs are represented in the Knesset. The valedictorian at Technion University Medical School this year is an Arab woman. She contends that there are more opportunities for women in Israel then anywhere in the Arab world.

It is not merely myopia that afflicts SJP, it is a hatred of the very existence of Israel. For this group of anti-Zionists, there is only one flag that should fly over the territory; it is a Palestinian flag encompassing all the land between the Jordan and the Mediterranean. In their collective imagination, Israel should not exist.

This is the real struggle. Attempting to redress historical wrongs or perceived wrongs is a pretext for the real agenda. Of course a university must allow for the free and civil exchange of opinion, even naïve and malevolent opinion. But academic freedom does not shield advocates of a hoax against other students. Where does the administration stand when students act irresponsibly? Administrative silence is tantamount to acquiescence. Terrorists know that and students tearing the shield off university policies know it as well.

Ten Reasons Why The BDS Movement Is Immoral And Hinders Peace ~~ By Alan M. Dershowitz

By Findalis of Monkey in the Middle


From The Gatestone Institute

As a strong supporter of the two state solution and a critic of Israel's settlement policies, I am particularly appalled at efforts to impose divestment, boycotts and sanctions against Israel, and Israel alone, because BDS makes it more difficult to achieve a peaceful resolution of the Mid-East conflict that requires compromise on all sides.

The BDS movement is highly immoral, threatens the peace process and discourages the Palestinians from agreeing to any reasonable peace offer. Here are ten compelling reasons why the BDS movement is immoral and incompatible with current efforts to arrive at a compromise peace.

1. The BDS movement immorally imposes the entire blame for the continuing Israeli occupation and settlement policy on the Israelis. It refuses to acknowledge the historical reality that on at least three occasions, Israel offered to end the occupation and on all three occasions, the Palestinian leadership, supported by its people, refused to accept these offers. In 1967, I played a small role in drafting UN Security Council Resolution 242 that set out the formula for ending the occupation in exchange for recognition of Israel's right to exist in peace. Israel accepted that Resolution, while the Palestinians, along with all the Arab nations, gathered in Khartoum and issued their three famous "nos:" No peace, no negotiation, no recognition. There were no efforts to boycott, sanction or divest from these Arab naysayers. In 2000-2001, Israel's liberal Prime Minister Ehud Barak, along with American President Bill Clinton, offered the Palestinians statehood, and the end of the occupation. Yasser Arafat rejected this offer—a rejection that many Arab leaders considered a crime against the Palestinian people. In 2007, Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert offered the Palestinians an even better deal, an offer to which they failed to respond. There were no BDS threats against those who rejected Israel's peace offers. Now there are ongoing peace negotiations in which both parties are making offers and imposing conditions. Under these circumstances, it is immoral to impose blame only on Israel and to direct a BDS movement only against the nation state of the Jewish people, that has thrice offered to end the occupation in exchange for peace.

2. The current BDS movement, especially in Europe and on some American university campuses, emboldens the Palestinians to reject compromise solutions to the conflict. Some within the Palestinian leadership have told me that the longer they hold out against making peace, the more powerful will be the BDS movement against Israel. Why not wait until the BDS strengthens their bargaining position so that they won't have to compromise by giving up the right of return, by agreeing to a demilitarized state and by making other concessions that are necessary to peace but difficult for some Palestinians to accept? The BDS movement is making a peaceful resolution harder.

3. The BDS movement is immoral because its leaders will never be satisfied with the kind of two state solution that is acceptable to Israel. Many of its leaders do not believe in the concept of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people. (The major leader of the BDS movement, Marwan Barghouti, has repeatedly expressed his opposition to Israel's right to exist as the nation state of the Jewish people even within the 1967 borders.) At bottom, therefore, the leadership of the BDS movement is opposed not only to Israel's occupation and settlement policy but to its very existence.

4. The BDS movement is immoral because it violates the core principle of human rights: namely, "the worst first." Israel is among the freest and most democratic nations in the world. It is certainly the freest and most democratic nation in the Middle East. Its Arab citizens enjoy more rights than Arabs anywhere else in the world. They serve in the Knesset, in the Judiciary, in the Foreign Service, in the academy and in business. They are free to criticize Israel and to support its enemies. Israeli universities are hot beds of anti-Israel rhetoric, advocacy and even teaching. Israel has a superb record on women's rights, gay rights, environmental rights and other rights that barely exist in most parts of the world. Moreover, Israel's record of avoiding civilian casualties, while fighting enemies who hide their soldiers among civilians, is unparalleled in the world today. The situation on the West Bank is obviously different because of the occupation, but even the Arabs of Ramallah, Bethlehem and Tulkarim have more human and political rights than the vast majority of Arabs in the world today. Moreover, anyone—Jew, Muslim or Christian—dissatisfied with Israeli actions can express that dissatisfaction in the courts, and in the media, both at home and abroad. That freedom does not exist in any Arab country, nor in many non-Arab countries. Yet Israel is the only country in the world today being threatened with BDS. When a sanction is directed against only a state with one of the best records of human rights, and that nation happens to be the state of the Jewish people, the suspicion of bigotry must be considered.

5. The BDS movement is immoral because it would hurt the wrong people: it would hurt Palestinian workers who will lose their jobs if economic sanctions are directed against firms that employ them. It would hurt artists and academics, many of whom are the strongest voices for peace and an end to the occupation. It would hurt those suffering from illnesses all around the world who would be helped by Israeli medicine and the collaboration between Israeli scientists and other scientists. It would hurt the high tech industry around the world because Israel contributes disproportionally to the development of such life enhancing technology.

6. The BDS movement is immoral because it would encourage Iran—the world's leading facilitator of international terrorism—to unleash its surrogates, such as Hezbollah and Hamas, against Israel, in the expectation that if Israel were to respond to rocket attacks, the pressure for BDS against Israel would increase, as it did when Israel responded to thousands of rockets from Gaza in 2008-2009.

7. The BDS movement is immoral because it focuses the world's attention away from far greater injustices, including genocide. By focusing disproportionately on Israel, the human rights community pays disproportionately less attention to the other occupations, such as those by China, Russia and Turkey, and to other humanitarian disasters such as that occurring in Syria.

8. The BDS movement is immoral because it promotes false views regarding the nation state of the Jewish people, exaggerates its flaws and thereby promotes a new variation on the world's oldest prejudice, namely anti-Semitism. It is not surprising therefore that the BDS movement is featured on neo-Nazi, Holocaust denial and other overtly anti-Semitic websites and is promoted by some of the world's most notorious haters such as David Duke.

9. The BDS movement is immoral because it reflects and encourages a double standard of judgment and response regarding human rights violations. By demanding more of Israel, the nation state of the Jewish people, it expects less of other states, people, cultures and religions, thereby reifying a form of colonial racism and reverse bigotry that hurts the victims of human rights violations inflicted by others.

10. The BDS movement will never achieve its goals. Neither the Israeli government nor the Israeli people will ever capitulate to the extortionate means implicit in BDS. They will not and should not make important decisions regarding national security and the safety of their citizens on the basis of immoral threats. Moreover, were Israel to compromise its security in the face of such threats, the result would be more wars, more death and more suffering.

All decent people who seek peace in the Middle East should join together in opposing the immoral BDS movement. Use your moral voices to demand that both the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority accept a compromise peace that assures the security of Israel and the viability of a peaceful and democratic Palestinian state. The way forward is not by immoral extortionate threats that do more harm than good, but rather by negotiations, compromise and good will.

No Jews Please!

By Findalis
Monkey in the Middle

That is what Frederick Cohn attorney for Abdel Hameed Shehadeh is demanding that the court do.  He is demanding that no Jews be allowed on the jury.  It would be inflammatory and they could not judge Shehadeh fairly.

An attorney has hatched a shocking scheme to defend an accused terrorist in Brooklyn federal court: Purge the Jews.

Lawyer Frederick Cohn will ask a judge today to bar Jews from the jury hearing the case against Abdel Hameed Shehadeh, who’s accused of lying about trying to join jihadists in Pakistan.

Abdel Hameed Shehadeh

“Given that there’s going to be inflammatory testimony about Jews and Zionism, I think it would be hard for Jews to cast aside any innate antipathy,” said Cohn, who is Jewish.

“The American Jewish community is heavily aligned with Israel and Zionism. Here is a guy who is a Muslim, who is opposed to those things.”

The subject of the controversial ban first arose at a recent court hearing.

“Your Honor . . . as you know, I’m not wild about having Jews on the jury in this case,” Cohn told Brooklyn federal Judge Eric Vitaliano in February.

Federal prosecutors William Sarratt and James Loonam reacted with alarm.

“I don’t think Judge [Robert] Levy will be ready to violate the Constitution and exclude people from the jury on the basis of their religious beliefs,” Sarratt told the judge.

Magistrate Judge Levy will begin selecting the jury this week.

The Shehadeh trial is not the first time jurors’ religious views have taken center stage at a court proceeding.

At the initial trial of two black men accused of civil-rights violations stemming from the Crown Heights killing in 1991 of Hasidic scholar Yankel Rosenbaum, Brooklyn federal Judge David Trager tried to balance the religious and racial composition of the jury.

But an appellate court overturned the verdict, saying the approach violated the Constitution.

Cohn conceded that his proposal is a “long shot.” But he argued that rules governing methods of selecting juries don’t allow attorneys to delve deep into the private recesses of a potential juror’s mind to determine if they are biased.

“I don’t know of a gentler way to deal with this, and sometimes you have to wield a meat ax,” Cohn said of the difficulty in ascertaining the deeply held beliefs of a potential jurist.

His client is a US citizen born and raised in New York who is charged with three counts of making false statements in connection with a terrorism offense.

Source

Given the acceptance of anti-Semitism I can see this happening.  Pretty soon it will be no non-Muslims on juries when a Muslim is being tried.  Then enforcement of Shar'ia Law.  We are slowly, but definitely losing the battle against the enforcement of Shar'ia in the US.

Another Day, Another Swastika

By Findalis


Once again in Brooklyn, New York swastikas were painted on stores and a synagogue in Borough Park.  This is a few months after the Midwood Anti-Semitic Attacks.  Then as now, Mayor Bloomberg and Borough President Marty Markowitz are quiet on this attack.  (Their silence on the other attacks were thunderous.)

Police are seeking the sick vandals who painted a half-dozen swastikas found this morning in a Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn.

The swastikas were found at a synagogue, a Jewish bath house and several businesses around 16th Avenue in Borough Park.

Cops are investigating the vandalism as a hate crime, and are reviewing surveillance video from the area. No arrests have been made.

Surveillance video from Fischman’s Food Center at 4421 16th Ave., one of the vandalized businesses, shows two men in hoodies walking up to the store at about 2:45 a.m.

One of the men spray-painted the store’s front roll down gate, and then drew a swastika on the front plastic window panel.

The other man walked out of the camera’s view.

“Because they’ve got extra paint in their cans, they have to go out and spray other people’s property?” said Scheindel Fischman, who owns the business with her husband.

“It’s ridiculous. I’ve never heard of something like that,” she said.

“It’s a terrible shame that someone would do something like that,” said neighborhood resident Moshe Zwolinski, 53. “These are people who don’t really understand our culture and how we live.”

“What kind of sick person does this in a neighborhood of Holocaust survivors?” asked Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn), one of an array of elected officials who expressed outrage over the incident.

The vandalized locations include Irgun Shiurai Torah, a synagogue on 16th Avenue at 46th Street, and Mikvah Israel, a bath house at 18th Avenue and 47th Street. A swastika was also sprayed on a car an area resident had parked near IS 223 at 16th Avenue and 42nd Street.

One woman feared the sick hate scrawl was just the beginning.

"It's very scary, they have the guts to come and do that," Moseh Liebermann, 70, said. "They start with the synagogue and then they will go to everybody's house."

No arrests have been made and the NYPD is reviewing security tapes from nearby businesses.

Anyone with information about this crime should call the NYPD confidential tip line at 1-800-577-TIPS.



Source

I should now expect Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to start marching in the neighborhood and demand a full investigation and put some poor shmuck in prison.

Sorry wrong minority.  I wish that Mayor Bloomberg and Brooklyn Borough President Markowitz would come to Borough Park and march for justice in Brooklyn.  Or is this going to be swept under the rug like the others were.

The New Nazis

This article over at Family Security Matters is phenomenal and I really cannot add anything to it other than to quote one of the opening sections:

There was a time when Jewish children were hunted down and killed in France. Their killers believed themselves to be members of a superior group that was destined to rule the world and enslave or exterminate members of inferior groups. The cowardice and appeasement of the French authorities allowed them to operate freely, to kill Jews and launch attacks on other countries.
What was then is now again. The occupying army doesn't wear uniforms, it wears keffiyahs. It doesn't speak German, it speaks Arabic. It doesn't believe that it is superior for reasons of race as much as for reasons of religion. It does not view all others as Untermenschen, but as infidels. It looks forward not to a thousand year Reich, but to a thousand year Caliphate.

The reality is there in Europe, as it all starts over again. Will the people of the world of 2012 mimic their ancestors of the 1930's and the 1940's and allow the horrors that the world was never to allow again?

The New Nazis


There was a time when Jewish children were hunted down and killed in France. Their killers believed themselves to be members of a superior group that was destined to rule the world and enslave or exterminate members of inferior groups. The cowardice and appeasement of the French authorities allowed them to operate freely, to kill Jews and launch attacks on other countries.
What was then is now again. The occupying army doesn't wear uniforms, it wears keffiyahs. It doesn't speak German, it speaks Arabic. It doesn't believe that it is superior for reasons of race as much as for reasons of religion. It does not view all others as Untermenschen, but as infidels. It looks forward not to a thousand year Reich, but to a thousand year Caliphate.

Mohammed Merah did not chase down a French-Jewish seven year old girl, put a gun to her head and pull the trigger because he came from an economically depressed area or any of the other media spin. He was only doing what Muslims had been doing to non-Muslims for over a thousand years. He didn't do what he did because he was "radicalized", he did it because he became a fully committed Muslim.

It won't end with taking down one man and it won't end with Jewish children. When your ideology believes that it is in a zero-sum struggle with the rest of the world and that membership means that you are a superior breed of human being because you worship the Fuhrer or Allah, then it won't stop. It won't ever stop. Not until the figurehead is toppled, the creed is humiliated and the supermen are shown to be cowards, neurotics, pedophiles, insecure men dressing up their weaknesses in power fantasies.

Between all the non-stop coverage, the expressions of grief, the political pandering, no one is stating the obvious. France has been occupied all over again. Once again the occupation has been carried out with the consent of the authorities who have decided that cowardice is the only way. Vichy France has become Vichy Europe, Vichy America, Vichy Australia, where the blatant appeasement is disguised as honor, treason is portrayed as responsible leadership and collaboration in the mass murder of your own people is never acknowledged as such.

It's not Neo-Nazis that are the threat to Jews today. It's the new Nazis and the old Nazis who were rounding up Jews into ghettos and murdering their children long before a thousand years before Hitler. The Neos are pathetically longing for the return of a genocidal state that isn't coming back, while the Muslims are actually working to bring back their genocidal state. They are doing it in Egypt, in Libya, in Pakistan and in England, France and Spain.

Muslims have hated Jews before the telephone, the telegraph, the steam engine, gunpowder, movable type and paper currency. And now surrounded by smartphones, credit cards and jet planes, they still hate them. That simple undeniable fact is denied by government, in every university and in every center of culture. And every one of those deniers has blood on his hands.

Not only the blood of the Jewish children murdered by Mohammed Merah. Not only the blood of Jews murdered by Muslims in France. But the blood of all those who have been killed by Muslim immigrants, no matter of what generation, in the name of Islam.

The names of Chamberlain, Petain and Quisling have become eternally infamous because they stand for appeasement and collaboration. But then what do we make of the names Blair, Sarkozy and Stoltenberg? What have the latter done differently from their predecessors? The left likes to pretend that its collaboration with Islam is moral, while the collaboration with Nazism was immoral. It's a distinction without a difference.

Does it really matter whether the men murdering children in the name of their Fuhrer call him Adolf or Mohammed? Does it matter whether they call themselves Hans or Mohammed? Does it matter whether their fantasies of superiority are based on bad science or bad religion? What matters is the end result. A foreign enemy controls your cities, murders at will and takes your future for his own.

The Tolouse Massacre did not come out of the blue, it follows decades of Muslim violence in France-- a Kristalnacht that has been going on year after year. It will not stop here. Not while there are five million Muslim in France, some of whom are bound to pick up the Koran and take it seriously. The "radical" clerics that Mohammed Merah listened to did not innovate a new religion, there has never been any basis to the teachings of the so-called radicals other than the Koran. The only book more popular in the Muslim world than Mein Kampf.

"O Muslims, O Servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him." That is what Muslims look forward to in their end times. Rocks and trees that tell them where the Jews are so that the fat faithful servants of Allah don't have to spend too much time and energy searching for their victims. Mohammed Merah did not have any trees or rocks to tell him where to find Jews to kill. But he had a compliant French state which tolerated a known Jihadist to the detriment of his victims.

The question, as always, after every act of Muslim terror is how many more must die? How many? Because the killing will continue. It has gone on for over a thousand years. It is not about to stop now. Muslim leaders who condemn these acts do it for tactical reasons, not moral ones. They don't believe it's wrong to kill rebellious non-Muslims... unless the act rebounds against non-Muslims.

The difference between the "radicals" and the "moderates" is that the radicals want to engage in genocide even while they are a minority, while the moderates want to wait until they are a majority. The radicals are satisfied with killing a few Hindus, Christians, Jews, here and there. The moderates want to wait and kill millions. Neither are our allies. Both are our murderers.

There is no peaceful way forward here. Carving up Czechoslovakia, Cyprus or Israel will not sate the blood lust of people whose egos are fed by hate, who treat every concession as proof of their own superiority, who love nothing so much as for others to fear them. There is no peace to be had with a creed that defines peace exclusively in terms of its own dominance over others.

Islam, like Nazism, is a disease of the soul, a twin sense of superiority and victimhood possessed by the angry corner dwellers of the world, who are certain that they would rule if only it wasn't for all the others holding them back. To understand a Nazi or a Muslim, you don't need to learn their creeds, just stare into the eyes of a wife beater, a pedophile or any bully and you will see that same smirk which easily transforms into outrage, the arrogant tone that turns unctuous when it is set back on its heels, the flickering eyes that are always looking at what they can't have.

You don't need to read the Koran to understand Mohammed Merah, you can just as easily understand the Koran by reading about what Mohammed Merah did. Nothing much has changed in all the centuries, except that Mohammed Merah didn't get to rape the girl he murdered, because the French state was still functional enough to keep him on the run. The day will however come when it won't be and then the peoples of the free world will learn what true Muslim terror really is, as the peoples of Africa and Asia, as the many other religions of the Middle East, including the Jews learned, in the day of the original Mohammed.

There is nothing extraordinary about what Mohammed Merah did. You may think that there is, but that is because you are a citizen of the free world and you have become used to that rare thing known as civilized behavior. But when your nations opened their borders to people who consider your infidel lands, the Dar Al-Harb, the House of the Sword, then civilization gets its throat cut, it gets chased down at a school, has a gun put to its head and the trigger gets pulled.

Killing children is not a shocking act in the Middle East, except when CNN points its cameras the right way. Parents routinely kill their own children for minor offenses that would hardly get an American child grounded. When they move to America or Canada, they kill their children there too and we considerately look away. If they do that to their children, why do you think they will have any more mercy on yours?
There is no point in holding Mohammed Merah accountable for what he did, just as there was no point in bringing Nazi leaders to trial for crimes against humanity. Mohammed recognizes no form of law other than the law of Islam, just as the Nazis recognized no other form of humanity than their own. There is no common moral or legal system that we share with Islam. Equality before the law, the cornerstone of our system, is so much noise in the windy corridors of the mosque. How can the Subhuman be equal to the Aryan, how can the Infidel be equal to the Muslim?

Mohammed Merah is a mad dog and should be treated as what he is. Accountability is for those who share our moral system. It is for our own leaders who continue perpetuating the macabre myth of a religion of peace, even while attending the funerals of its victims. Accountability is for the Petains, the Chamberlains and the Quislings who have led us into this hole and keep waving in more Mohammeds to come and join the party.

The old Nazis marched in at the head of an army. The new Nazis bought a plane ticket. The old Nazis had to get by the French Armed Forces and the Royal Air Force. The new Nazis are welcomed in and anyone who says a word otherwise faces trials and jail sentences. The old Nazis deported Jews to camps. The new Nazis kill them right in the cities. And the killing will not stop until the Muslim occupation of Europe comes to an end.

Muslim Bosnian Neo-Nazi Group: Most Of the World's Problems Result From a Plot Aimed at "Letting the 'Chosen People' Control... the World"

Well, well...isn't it just peachy how America saved all the poor Muslim Bosnians in the Balkans only to see now that groups like the Bosnian National Pride Movement have sprung up to further the hate of the Nazis of decades ago. Oh, and before you confuse this supremacy group with what sprang up in Germany, read this:

What differentiates the BPNP from other European neo-Nazi groups is that it was founded by, and is intended for, Muslim Bosnians

The story comes to us from MEMRI and shows the absolute hate of this group and others in the region for the Jews in Israel and quite frankly, Jews anywhere. I strongly encourage you to read the whole site and realize that this region is falling apart...at the hands of the Islamists - the same Islamists that Bill Clinton decided to favor in the war there. Back then it was the evil Serbs...but some of us told Bill Clinton he was getting snowed. He was. He didn't listen.

Muslim Bosnian Neo-Nazi Group: Most Of the World's Problems Result From a Plot Aimed at "Letting the 'Chosen People' Control... the World"


Introduction

The Bosanski Pokret Nacionalnog Ponosa (Bosnian National Pride Movement), founded about two years ago, describes itself as a National Socialist (Nazi) movement championing white supremacy and Bosnian national revival. What differentiates the BPNP from other European neo-Nazi groups is that it was founded by, and is intended for, Muslim Bosnians – as evident from its spheres of operation, which are listed on its website. [1] Indeed, the site states that 95% of the group's members are Muslim (though this is not a mandatory requirement for membership). The website also reveals that the group celebrates the Muslim-Nazi alliance during the Second World War: It reveres the Muslims who joined the Nazi war effort, and sees a role model in their leader, then-mufti of Jerusalem Hajj Amin Al-Husseini, who from 1941 through 1945 collaborated with the Nazi leadership and the SS.

It should be mentioned that unlike some EU countries, Bosnia does not ban Neo-Nazi groups or the use of Nazi symbols – enabling the organization to operate and circulate its materials with impunity.

This report will review the organization's ideology, as described on its site.

The Ideology of the BPNP

The BPNP website, which has sections in Bosnian and English, states that the organization's ideology is based on the doctrine of Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, as set out in his manifesto The NAZI-SOZI: Questions and Answers for Nationalist Socialists (1932). A section on the site is features the "Ten Commandments for National Socialists," which is part of this manifesto, adapted for the current circumstances in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Another section on the site, headed "BNPM Attitudes," stresses Bosnian nationalism and lists the ideologies the group rejects, which include communism, capitalism, Islamism and also Zionism, which, according to the site, is striving for world domination. The section, written in English, states:

"We are against alliances and unions whose purpose is establishment and protection of the new world order (EU as continental union and NATO as a global army). Bosnia must be a free nation with its own army which is always ready to defend the country's sovereignty, [and which] opposes [the] globalization policy which is being forced by Zionist structures with just one purpose – [the] creation of one world government which will allow the 'gray eminence'[2] to rule the world.

"Ideologies that are not welcome in Bosnia are: Zionism, Islamism, communism, capitalism. The only ideology good for us is Bosnian nationalism because it secures national prosperity and social justice..."

The inclusion of "Islamism" among the rejected ideologies is noteworthy. As mentioned, the site states that 95% of the group's members are Muslim (the other 5% being Bogomils – members of a Gnostic Christian sect that advocates a return to early Christianity). However, the site also stresses that religious affiliation is irrelevant to membership in the organization, which champions white supremacy, and that the organization does not consider religious clerics and institutions as sources of authority. In fact, it states that Bosnia's religious establishment, and its leader, the Chief Mufti, lack any legitimacy, for they are tools through which the EU and the international community are destroying the national fabric of Bosnia. In terms of religious sentiments, the organization seems to sympathize with the Creativity Movement, a nontheistic modern religion that many white supremacist groups embrace as "the white man's religion."

In addition to rejecting Zionists, communists, capitalists and Islamists, the organization also expresses hostility towards other groups despised by the Nazis, namely homosexuals, gypsies and blacks.

The section titled "literature" features links to texts by Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Benito Mussolini, Reinhard Heydrich (a senior commander in the SS and one of the main architects of the Holocaust), and Alfred Rosenberg (a Nazi leader and Reich Minister for the Occupied Eastern Territories), as well as articles about the SS and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, literature about the evil influence of the Freemasons, and various texts on race theory and white supremacy.[4] The site's photo gallery includes images relating to various topics that concern the group, including "BPNP propaganda," "campaigns," "enemies," and Bosnian history.

As for the group's activities, they seem to be confined, so far, to operating the website, circulating propaganda fliers, spray-painting slogans, and holding clandestine meetings of the group members, who, according to the site, are "very carefully screened."

Celebrating Bosnian Collaboration with the Nazis in World War II

The site operator calls himself "Sauberzweig," after Karl Gustav Sauberzweig, commander of the 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar.[5] This was a division of Muslim Bosnians, recruited by Hajj Amin Al-Husseini in the autumn of 1943, which fought on the side of the Nazis in the Second World War. The division – which participated in the occupation of Hungary in 1944, and was also charged with the task of guarding the railway from Hungary to Slovakia and Poland, where half of Hungary's Jews were exterminated – is highly revered by the BPNP. The site quotes reports by high-ranking Nazis about the division and its soldiers:

"The Bosnian is a very good soldier. His strength lies in the use of terrain and in close combat. With the infantry attack he is in his element. In defense, however, he must be led strictly and with caution. During heavy barrages of enemy artillery and air attacks, he must be led very carefully. He is good natured, but hates the Serbian element. To the officer who wins his heart he will bond himself with an almost childlike loyalty. He has an extreme sense of fairness and feeling of honor.

"He loves his Bosnian homeland. This strength must be reinforced repeatedly, i.e. it must be stressed that the time when the division returns to the Balkans to save the homeland depends on the individual. The sooner he masters his tasks, the sooner the division will be ready for action." – SS Brigadefuhrer Karl G. Sauberzweig

I knew there was a chance that a few traitors might be smuggled into the division, but I haven't the slightest doubt concerning the loyalty of the Bosnians. – [Reichsführer-SS] Heinrich Himmler[6]

Also quoted on the website are statements by the division's Muslim commanders describing the vision they shared with the Nazis:

"They [i.e., the enemies of the Germans] are your enemy and God's enemy. And that is the English, Americans, and Bolsheviks, who fight against faith, against God, against morality, and just order. On the other side stands National Socialist Germany with its allies, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, who fight for God, faith, morality, and a fairer and more righteous order in the world, as well as for a fairer distribution of goods that God has produced for all people.

"As we observe this Bajram feast with good food, and even halva, an entire army of our brothers, our refugees, wander about from city to village, wrapped in rags, barefooted, hungry and cold. Their Bajram feast will be spent in misery and distress. It is even sadder that the Cetniks [Serbian nationalist and monarchist paramilitary organizations] and Partisans carry on their activities, murdering and plundering wherever they go. But we call out to them, 'You can murder and plunder, but the day will come when the tables are turned!'" – Imam Waffen-SS Hanžar divizije, Muhasilovic

"These deeds signify the great benevolence for us Muslims and for Bosnia in general. I therefore consider it my duty to extend our thanks to the Reichsfuhrer-SS in the names of the division's Imams as well as an in the names of the hundreds of thousands of Bosnia's poor in that I pledge that we are prepared to lay down our lives in battle for the great leader Adolf Hitler and the New Europe." – Imam of Handschar division SS-Hauptsturmführer Husein Džozo[8]

The site's picture gallery includes many photos illustrating the Bosnian collaboration with the Nazis in World War II, such as photos of parades held in honor of Amin Al-Husseini during his visits to Bosnia, and photos of the soldiers and officers of the Handschar Division.

The Group's Antisemitism

The site's "Question and Answer" section elaborates on the group's hostility towards the Jews. The site operator writes:

"The Jews have immense influence throughout the world – in [the domains of] politics, economy, culture, and religion. Anyone who scoffs at [the notion of] a Jewish conspiracy need only open the Bible. He will find that, for over 1,000 years, the European peoples have embraced a religion that, for some unknown reason, designates the Jews as the chosen people, and states that the son of God was a Jew and that God promised the Jews control of a certain geographic area. A thinking man should ask himself: how is it that a nation so small has played such a large role in the lives of the European peoples? To ignore this question is to ignore reality.

"It is a fact that Jewish forces were involved in the French Revolution, in the First World War, in the October [1917] Revolution and in the Second World War. Anyone with eyes in his head can see that. It's [also] a fact that Jewish forces are waging a culture-war against Europe. They want to erase every trace of the authentic European culture and replace it with the American anti-culture called 'multi-culturalism'! The same forces are also promoting [a policy of] open borders and mass-migration, which [have] been destroying Europe's natural development since ancient times. They want to create a world that stifles all the good fruits of our forefathers' [culture]. The fact is that the Aryan race did not survive more than 50 years under the rule of these forces. All we want is to defend our right to existence and life."[10]

A section headed "New World Order" states that the Jews are, in effect, controlling the world:

"Freedom of speech is granted to a handful of 'privileged' politicians, journalists and functionaries that are puppets of the Zionist mechanism... The authorities quickly silence and censor the voices that come to defend the values that are trampled daily by the effective media propaganda, controlled by the ruling Jews. Truth is dear, but any prisoner knows that freedom is priceless... 90% of the problems in the world are the result of a dark plan formulated by the promoters of the New World Order with the aim of letting the 'chosen people' control their empire, namely the [entire] world. This diabolical plan is masterminded by the Zionists, the Freemasons and the Illuminati,[11] and we become party to it whenever we believe their lies... A certain group of people is trying to suppress the emotions of humanity at large, emotions that are so important! They want to preserve the 'chosen people' status that they have established for themselves. [They believe] we 'gentiles' must know our place, because, [according to them], they are the elite and we are [mere] animals dancing to their tune."[12]

They Are Going To Kill Obama!

And Guess Who The They Is?

Louis Farrakhan told his Nation of Islam Cult that the Jews will kill Obama, destroy their cult, and want to take over the world.

In a fiery lecture to thousands of followers of the Nation of Islam on Sunday in Chicago, Minister Louis Farrakhan warned that racial hatred could lead to attempts to assassinate President Barack Obama.

Farrakhan spent much of his oration decrying what he cast as Satan's influence over racist forces in politics and society before asking a pointed rhetorical question: "Do you think they're wicked enough to be plotting our brother's assassination as we speak?"

Farrakhan delivered his speech to an enthusiastic crowd of adherents packed loosely into the United Center for the Nation of Islam's annual observance of Saviours' Day, which celebrates the birth of the faith's founder, W. Fard Muhammad. This year's events marked the 82nd year of the religion's existence in North America.

With his finger jabbing at the air above him and his voice frequently raising to an indignant shout, Farrakhan, 78, delivered his message to a crowd of men in dark suits with bow ties and women in shimmering white gowns and scarves.

He spoke for more than three hours on a broad array of topics, excoriating U.S. foreign policy, suggesting that the9/11attacks were a government-planned pretext for war in the Middle East, lamenting recent extreme weather and attacking mothers for serving their children food from McDonald's. He also returned repeatedly to a topic that has attracted intense controversy in the past: the influence of Jews in politics and media.

Farrakhan drew a distinction between noble Jews and followers of "the synagogue of Satan," and he pointed to a recent incident in which the publisher of a Jewish magazine suggested Israeli security forces could help preserve Israel by killing Obama. He attacked Israeli policies, while also directing criticism at perceived Jewish influence in the U.S.

"Jewish people were not the origin of Hollywood, but they took it over," he said, blaming the entertainment industry for degrading the country's morality.

While Farrakhan called out conservatives for questioning Obama's citizenship and even criticizing the figure of first lady Michelle Obama, he also attacked the president for his support of efforts to remove Middle Eastern leaders and warned him against any potential military action in Iran. The crowd roared as he called on them to be "conscientious objectors" to any strike against Iran.

He again condemned the killing of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi. Farrakhan was friends with the slain dictator, and the Nation of Islam's headquarters was purchased 40 years ago with a $3 million loan from Gadhafi.

Farrakhan also suggested that Osama bin Laden was killed by U.S. forces, instead of being detained for questioning, because the government might not have been able to prove all its accusations against him.

On domestic policy, Farrakhan said the national debt has reached unsustainable levels, and he challenged Obama's assertion in his recent State of the Union speech that the country is not in decline.

"America is on her deathbed. The vital signs of America are not good," he said.

As he spoke, Farrakhan was flanked by dozens of associates and dignitaries, including another controversial religious figure based in Chicago: the Rev. Michael Pfleger, who stood to receive praise from Farrakhan and applause from the crowd.

Near the close of his speech, Farrakhan spent several minutes comparing Obama's political situation to that of Abraham Lincoln, who was assassinated after winning a second term, and suggested an assassination plot against Obama might involve a "patsy," a person set up to take the blame for a broader conspiracy.

"I believe they want a Muslim to kill President Obama," he said.

Source

Louis Farrakhan sided for years with Gadhafi, Arafat, Saddam Hussein, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and any other dictator that speaks out against the United States, Jews, Israel or all three.

How much longer will the clown Farrakhan be allowed to speak his words of hatred unchallenged?



By Findalis of Monkey in the Middle

Why Does a California State University Condone the Anti-Semitism of One of Its Professors?

The first paragraph of this article at Family Security Matters sums up the situation on all college campuses in America, not just in California when it states:

Spend any time on a university campus, and the official culture will become obvious in short order. Bigotry and prejudice against blacks, gays, or women simply isn’t tolerated. Even a hint of racism or sexism is met with quick and decisive punishment. But anti-Israel rants on California’s public-college campuses seem to be tolerated, politely ignored, or even tacitly condoned by the powers that be.

I have simply never been able to figure it out where certain groups are protected with a wall of concrete and yet Israel and Jews are considered fair game. Let's face it...in a country FOUNDED on Judeo principles, we have come full circle at many college campuses where Muslims are protected and Jews are accosted. Let's think about that for a moment - the persecution of Jews over the centuries is ignored while the banner of supposed persecution of so-called Palestinians is held high. What this amounts to, in my opinion, is the college education field itself - you see, some of the most derelict and extreme of all society's misfits are drawn to being college professors....these are radicals that go through the college education system and realize they have no place outside of those walls....they understand that making a living in the real world doesn't appeal to them...they want to spend the rest of their life "protesting" so they decide that the only way they can sling hate and still pay their Macy's bills is by becoming a college professor.

I've said it many times before that we, the American people, hold the key to culling these rogue professors from the herd. If you see California State has this type of a sick bastard teaching at their school and they condone his behavior, you simply don't allow your child to attend that college. When California State figures out that their enrollments are down 38% due to these scumbags on their staff, they will make the changes necessary. Believe me, the college and university system in America is based on capitalism....they won't want to admit it but it is.

Cal State's Chutzpah


Spend any time on a university campus, and the official culture will become obvious in short order. Bigotry and prejudice against blacks, gays, or women simply isn’t tolerated. Even a hint of racism or sexism is met with quick and decisive punishment. But anti-Israel rants on California’s public-college campuses seem to be tolerated, politely ignored, or even tacitly condoned by the powers that be.

Consider the case of David Klein, a math professor at California State University, Northridge (CSUN). Klein maintains a page on the university’s web server having nothing to do with mathematical physics, teacher education, or standardized testing, his main areas of research. Rather, the page is devoted to the evils of the state of Israel. Students and other members of the university can learn that “Israel is the most racist state in the world at this time” and that the Jewish state engages in “ethnic cleansing.” Visitors can discover, furthermore, that the answer to the question “Aren’t Palestinians equally responsible for the violence?” is an emphatic “No.” Klein provides links to an assortment of Israel haters and, of course, calls for a boycott of Israeli products and U.S. companies that do business with Israel.

It isn’t hard to imagine what would happen to a professor who used the university’s website to post content opposed, say, to illegal immigration or legal abortion, especially if the subject was outside his academic field. Administrators would demand that the pages disappear, and they’d cite the university’s policies, chapter and verse. We know university administrators would loudly condemn a professor who maintained a website off campus that had a “deleterious effect on the university’s reputation.” That’s what happened in 2010, when CSUN erupted in outrage over economics professor Kenneth Ng’s personal site, Bigbabykenny.com—which, his critics claimed, promoted illegal sex tourism in Thailand. Both the Gender and Women’s Studies Department and the Asian-American Studies Department publicly denounced Ng, and several students and faculty demanded that he take the site down or lose his job. But while university officials blasted the site, they stopped short of forcing Ng to take it down. Ng removed the site anyway, after weeks of public pressure. “I think he realized he’s putting the university in an awkward position,” CSUN provost Harold Hellenbrand told the campus newspaper, adding, “We expect that [faculty] act at a higher level than their profession requires.”

Yet no one within the CSUN community has condemned Klein, and his webpage remains active—though it clearly violates university policies, which state that “use of computers, networks, and computing facilities for activities other than academic purposes or University business is not permitted.” The university also prohibits associating its name with boycotts and other politically motivated activity. CSUN further retains the right to remove “any defamatory, offensive, infringing, or illegal materials” from its website at any time.

A recent administrative review, however, cleared Klein of any violations. “The University does uphold and preserve the principles of academic freedom—and Professor Klein’s right to express his views,” CSUN president Jolene Koester said in a statement. “Our review affirmed that this right extends to the use of an individual’s web pages, as part of the University website, as a vehicle for expression.” Koester apparently is uninterested in discussing the matter further. UC Santa Cruz language lecturer Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, who heads the AMCHA Initiative, an organization to counteract anti-Semitism on college campuses, challenged the president in a November 22 e-mail. “If you choose not to remove Professor Klein’s anti-Semitic material from the CSUN website,” Rossman-Benjamin wrote, “we will presume that it is because the University finds nothing ‘defamatory, offensive, infringing, or illegal’ about these webpages, and is unconcerned with the effects they may have on CSUN students, parents, community members, and taxpayers.” Koester’s e-mailed reply: “Too bad.” After Rossman-Benjamin forwarded Koester’s reply to top Cal State officials and several state politicians with oversight authority, Koester explained lamely that she’d meant to send the e-mail to “university staff” and that “the comment ‘too bad’ was meant to express to internal staff regret about the controversy and the distress it has caused.”

Koester is retiring this year, but it’s unlikely that the administrators who remain after she’s gone will be of much help. Hellenbrand, who will take over as interim president, cosigned a November open letter from Klein to Cal State University Chancellor Charles Reed, arguing that the university should not permit study abroad in Israel. All but four of the 127 signatories on Klein’s letter are from CSUN. (The university will continue the program.)

Contrary to Koester’s claims, the David Klein matter has nothing to do with academic freedom and everything to do with official hypocrisy. A professor has the right to speak on his own behalf, but not to use a public university’s resources to smear Israel as a murderous oppressor. In the private sector, such conduct would be grounds for censure or termination. A university in the public trust should be held to a standard at least as high.

Kristallnact In Brooklyn

73 years since the German's gave us Kristallnact it has occurred once again, this time in Brooklyn.

There’s shock and outrage in Brooklyn today after several cars were torched and numerous pieces of anti-Semitic vandalism took place in Midwood.

The incident was discovered at around 5 a.m., when residents awoke to see cars burning.

At least three cars were set ablaze and dozens of pieces of anti-Semitic graffiti were plastered along benches. The cars were damaged and the benches vandalized along Ocean Parkway between Avenues I and J. Among the vandalism: “KKK” scrawled nearby, as well as numerous swastikas.

“People are nervous, people are concerned,” Assemblyman Dov Hikind said. “The police are putting extra manpower into the community at synagogues and all over.”

“Not a way to wake up on Friday morning going into the Sabbath, definitely not,” said Midwood resident Sherry Tawil.

The incident occurred on the anniversary of Kristallnacht, when Hitler’s Nazi’s launched a pogrom against Jews in Germany and Austria.

“I’m used to swastikas, but three cars destroyed is a whole new dimension,” said Hikind. “Three cars completely destroyed as if someone had dropped them bomb on them is just a real tragedy.”

“All of a sudden I heard explosion from the metal, I guess from the popping. I look out window. It was like my house was on fire,” victim Arlette Tebele told CBS 2′s John Slattery.

“The burning of cars and vandalism of benches in Midwood this morning represents a truly hateful act of prejudice,” said Public Advocate Bill De Blasio in a statement. “That it took place on the anniversary of Kristallnacht leaves no doubt that this attack is a hate crime in every sense, and I applaud the NYPD for investigating it as such.”

New York City Councilman David Greenfield is offering a $1,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person – or persons – responsible for the incident.

“We will not accept anti-Semitism in our community. There is zero tolerance for such acts of hatred and ignorance,” said Councilman Greenfield in a statement. “I’m confident that these hateful people will be caught and punished to the full extent of the law.”

“This is the most shocking thing we ever saw, never seen before,” said resident Vickie Ayal.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg issued the following statement Friday afternoon:

“New York City is home to more than 8 million of the most open and tolerant people in the world. But even here, there are occasional incidents involving actions that are hateful or vicious or both. The NYPD’s Hate Crimes Task Force is actively investigating the twisted person or people who attacked cars, benches, and a sidewalk on a block of Ocean Parkway early this morning. The Hate Crimes Task Force, like so many other teams at our Police Department, is the world’s best, as today’s arrest for swastikas painted in Queens during October and early November shows. In fact, hate crimes are down nearly 30 percent citywide so far this year and are down roughly 33 percent in Brooklyn’s 66th Precinct.

The fact that this most recent attack came on the heels of the 73rd anniversary of Kristalnacht may or may not be a coincidence. Either way, this kind of hateful act has no place in the freest city in the freest country in the world.”

Just a week ago, two libraries and a synagogue in Queens were vandalized with swastikas.

Anyone with any information is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 1-800-577-TIPS (8477). All calls are kept confidential. You can also log on to the Crime Stoppers website, or text your tip to CRIMES and then enter TIP577.

Source

I grew up in Midwood.  This is my old stomping grounds.  The place where my friends and I felt safe, secure.  There was never any incidents of this kind when we were kids.  What has happened?

There has been an upswing in anti-Semitic rhetoric and speech from the Occupy movement.  Can we forget Patricia McAllister and her rant of hatred?  Or this, or this, or this.  Just 3 of the 49,500 anti-Semitic images associated with the Occupy movement.

Where is the Main Stream Media and their disgust at this level of hatred?  Why is the President, Vice President and leadership of the Democratic Party standing next to this movement?  Why do they accept and promote such hatred?  They have stayed silent on this so long that they have accepted and are fostering this behavior.

73 years ago was the beginning of the Holocaust.  For years up to Kristallnact laws were passed restricting the movements, the rights, the occupations of Jews in Germany.  Today no such laws have been passed in the United States, but the level of hatred has risen to levels of violence.  Given the left's hatred of Jews, can laws restricting them be next?  I pray not.

By Findalis of Monkey in the Middle

Anti-Semitism, a Growth Industry in Bad Times

A synagogue and shops burning on Kristallnacht, 1938.

I think some of you may have noticed at one of the first You Tubes from the fledgling Occupy Wall Street protests that just started in New York City, there was the footage of the protester going off on Jews and literally telling the Jews to get out of America. Many were shocked at that and how the anti-Semitic sentiment could possibly be part of that protest movement, but some of us have seen this coming for a long time in America. We had seen the new wave of anti-Semitism washing over Europe and the stage was set for America.

This article at Family Security Matters talks about the rise in anti-Semitism in America, in Europe and across the world.

From the article:

In bad times, anti-Semitism seems to crawl out of the sewers like a repugnant odor. It is not subject to a rational response. It is pure emotion and a very nasty one at that. Lately we got a whiff of it at some of the Occupy protests.

On November 3rd, the Anti-Defamation League released a nationwide study that found that “anti-Semitic attitudes have risen slightly in America, demonstrating once again that ‘anti-Semitic beliefs continue to hold a vice-grip’ on asmall but not insubstantial segment of America.”

“The ADL survey found that 15 percent of Americans—nearly 35 million adults—hold deeply anti-Semitic views, an increase of 3 percent from a similar poll conducted in 2009, and matching the levels of anti-Semitic propensities recorded in the U.S. in 2005 and 2007.” Even so, what passes for anti-Semitism today is not remotely comparable to earlier, pre-World War Two generations.

I don't know about you but to know that there are 35 million anti-Semitic people in America makes my skin crawl. If the liberal mouthpieces of The Today Show or Good Morning America announced one morning that it had been confirmed that 35 million Americans held deep-seated hatred of Hispanics or Blacks in America, they would make a week long "special" out of it but 35 million Jew haters in America never even gets a mention.

What I find most disturbing is this growing trend of anti-Semitic behavior amongst the young people in America - we are talking about 18-22 year olds who have this hatred inside them and I will make the contention that this hatred was not experienced...it was TAUGHT to them by radical professors and radical student organizations. I ask you....why are there Muslim student association groups on every U.S. college campus? Do you really think there are that many Muslim students in America or do you think that possibly their goal is to set the stage for hate?

Anti-Semitism, a Growth Industry in Bad Times


n bad times, anti-Semitism seems to crawl out of the sewers like a repugnant odor. It is not subject to a rational response. It is pure emotion and a very nasty one at that. Lately we got a whiff of it at some of the Occupy protests.

On November 3rd, the Anti-Defamation League released a nationwide study that found that “anti-Semitic attitudes have risen slightly in America, demonstrating once again that ‘anti-Semitic beliefs continue to hold a vice-grip’ on asmall but not insubstantial segment of America.”

“The ADL survey found that 15 percent of Americans—nearly 35 million adults—hold deeply anti-Semitic views, an increase of 3 percent from a similar poll conducted in 2009, and matching the levels of anti-Semitic propensities recorded in the U.S. in 2005 and 2007.” Even so, what passes for anti-Semitism today is not remotely comparable to earlier, pre-World War Two generations.

One of the lesser reported aspects of the Occupy Wall Street movement has been a strong element of anti-Semitism. Little wonder that it has been endorsed by the American Nazi Party and other extreme groups, both Left and Right.

As Abraham H. Foxman, the ADL National Director, noted, “The fact that anti-Semitic attitudes have increased significantly over the past two years is troubling and raises questions about the impact of broader trends in America—financial insecurity, social uncertainty, the decline in civility and the growth of polarization—on attitudes toward Jews.”

For example, 19 percent of those polled answered “probably true” to the statement that “Jews have too much control/influence on Wall Street”, an increase from 14 percent in 2009. This indicates that Jewish stereotypes remain strong; particularly claims that Jews control Wall Street and the media.

This reflects events and attitudes in Europe as well. In an article published in the UK newspaper, The Guardian, on November 6, Emine Bozkurt, a Dutch MEP who heads the anti-racism lobby at the European Parliament, was quoted saying that “We are at a crossroads in European history. In five year’s time we will either see an increase in the forces of hatred and division in society, including ultra-nationalism, xenophobia, Islamaphobia and anti-Semitism, or we will be able to fight this horrific tendency.”

Thomas Klau of the European Council on Foreign Relations, referring to the study, said, “As anti-Semitism was a unifying factor for far-right parties in the 1910s, 20s and 30s, Islamaphobia has become the unifying factor in the early decades of the 21st century.”

The difference worth noting is that the Jews of Europe never had any intention of taking over those nations while Muslims have made it clear they want to impose Sharia law.

November 9-10 is the anniversary of Kristallnacht in 1938 (the Night of Broken Glass) in which Jews and their synagogues suffered violent attacks throughout Germany, the recently annexed Sudetanland, in Hanover, and the free city of Danzig. It was the beginning of what would evolve into the Holocaust, the deliberate extermination of Europe’s Jews.

Some Jews, in response to Europe’s entrenched anti-Semitism, joined the Zionist movement, beginning in the 1890s to create a Jewish homeland in Israel, moving there before the cataclysm of the Holocaust. At the time it was a protectorate of the British. Post-World War Two Holocaust survivors moved there and, in 1948 Israel declared its sovereignty. Thereafter, many Jews fled Middle Eastern nations for the sanctuary Israel provided and were later joined by Russian Jews fleeing the Soviet Union.

These days, the Holocaust-deniers in Iran openly boast of their intent to destroy Israel (and America) with the nuclear weapons they are developing.

The ADL report’s findings are unpleasant, but hardly surprising. Anti-Semitism in America is a phenomenon of the fringes of political movements of the Far Right (neo-Nazis) and Far Left (Communists).

In these times, however, Israel has no greater support than among American conservatives and evangelicals; Jews have no better friends.

The American historian and scholar, Thomas Cahill, said, "The Jew gave us the Outside and the Inside—our outlook and our inner life. We can hardly get up in the morning or cross the street without being Jewish. We dream Jewish dreams and hope Jewish hopes. Most of our best words, in fact—new, adventure, surprise, unique, individual, person, vocation, time, history, future, freedom, progress, spirit, faith, hope, justice—are the gifts of the Jews.”

OCCUPY DC vs. Employment Offers ("We won't do that")

Hat Tip to IggyMom

After more than a month of protest demands for better employment opportunities and benefits, Accuracy in Media saw fit to test their desires with...employment applications. Our "headhunters" were treated to every excuse as to why these jobs aren't good enough for them. We guess middle management opportunities with healthcare and 401k benefits aren't desirable anymore.



If you are really out of work, and need a job, you will take any job that you can find.  If necessary you will work 2, 3 or even more jobs to make ends meet.

These Moonbats want the $100K job immediately.  Not realizing that the person who has that job worked their way up the corporate ladder and EARNED that position.  Nothing was handed to him/her.  But after years of liberal education, these idiots are taught they are entitled to any thing these bastards want.  You must not destroy their self-esteem.

Also in Occupy DC we get this:



I am waiting for what one of these idiots tell us what they want to do with the Jews. Oh wait they have:



"I think that the Zionist Jews who are running these big banks and our Federal Reserve, which is not run by the federal government, they need to be run out of this country."

Ladies and Gentlemen it is 1938 and tomorrow is Kristallnact!

Coming soon to a city near you:

Anti-Semitism...Renewed Hate In the 21st Century

A number of weeks ago I did a Blog Talk Radio show entitled "Eden" in which I spoke about the Holocaust and how even after that world-changing event, the rise of anti-Semitism was on the rise in these modern days. This article from Family Security Matters further details how we are seeing the distinct rise in anti Jewish sentiment and actions in America and definitely in Europe. Believe me, this is frightening stuff.

From the article:

According to Haaretz, Pino made a further display of his uncontrolled hatred on Tuesday last week. Ishmael Khaldi, a Bedouin Arab in the Israeli foreign service, was visiting KSU. After Khaldi’s lecture, Pino asked him how he and the Israeli government “could justify providing aid to countries like Turkey with blood money that came from the deaths of Palestinian children and babies.”

When Khaldi responded that Pino’s question was disrespectful, Pino claimed that the visiting lecturer was not being respectful to him, and accused Israel of killing people. Pino left the auditorium, calling out “Death to Israel.”

However, even in its current incarnation, the New Statesman cannot ignore the blatant anti-Semitism that is almost fashionable in Britain. An article there, by Rob Marchant, is entitled “Anti-Semitism is the New Black,” and shows how members of the trade union movement are freely giving vent to their anti-Jewish feelings. An excerpt:

Oh, how fashionable it is all becoming. A month ago, enfant terrible designer John Galliano was fined over an anti-Semitic tirade at a Paris restaurant. But his drug-addled ramblings were just the latest signs of a wider trend.

There are numerous recent incidents -- ranging from an unpleasant flavour of anti-Israeli activism to straightforward racism -- that should sound alarm bells for the liberals among us. For example, take the odd promotion of renowned Jewish conspiracy theorist Gilad Atzmon's book on the Times' website. Or the "ugly" barracking of Israeli musicians during a London concert for the heinous crime of, er, being Israeli. Or a racist incident involving a Jewish student at St Andrews University.

It's my view that in these times we live in now, the filters of society have been removed - in America, what we are seeing is a movement where a person can say anything and not pay the price for even the most hateful rhetoric. I'm not requesting a silencing of speech but what is concerning to me is how a 20 year old girl at a college can stand up and vow that the Jews should be run out of America or worse and she isn't portrayed for what she is...an animal. Instead, her behavior is at least passed over...reinforcing to her and all around her that anything goes, baby.

We are seeing this in the OWS movement - it's like raging gone wild. And it is my view that this can only spiral into violence. Mark my words...within the next 60 days, we will see the first dead bodies associated with the OWS movement - we are going to see the raging packs of protesters draw their first blood and conversely, we undoubtedly will see security personnel return the favor. Certainly, it would be a tragic event but the fact of the matter is that chaos has achieved a place in our society. Whether it is allowed to flourish is another matter.

Kent State Hate


Kent State Professor Calls for “Death to Israel”

Kent State University (KSU) gained notoriety after Ohio National Guard members shot dead four students protesting against the U.S. invasion of Cambodia. That event took place on May 4, 1970. For half a decade, Kent State has become linked to radicalism and support for terrorism not via its students, but via a particularly bizarre tenured Associate Professor at the university’s history faculty. His speciality is Brazilian studies, and he has written a book on Brazilian favelas.

Julio César Pino was born in Cuba, and came to the United States in 1968, while still a child. Pino converted to Islam in 2000, adopting the Islamic name of “Assad Jibril Pino.” Mike S. Adams of Townhall.com has been the most ardent journalist to shine a spotlight on Pino’s outrageous behavior. It began with Pino running a weblog called “Global War” (global-war.bloghi.com, nowdefunct) in which he called for jihad, and supported acts of terrorism, including terrorism against Americans. Unhelpfully, in 2007 the University president denied PIno’s involvement in the site, even though Pino had used university web connections and facilities to produce the blog.

Pino has referred to the 19 mass-murderers who carried out the 9/11 attacks as “martyrs.” Last year, using his Kent State email address, Pino emailed Adams to refer to 66 dead Americans in Afghanistan as “dogs” and also referred to them by an anatomical name beginning with “c.”

According to Haaretz, Pino made a further display of his uncontrolled hatred on Tuesday last week. Ishmael Khaldi, a Bedouin Arab in the Israeli foreign service, was visiting KSU. After Khaldi’s lecture, Pino asked him how he and the Israeli government “could justify providing aid to countries like Turkey with blood money that came from the deaths of Palestinian children and babies.”

When Khaldi responded that Pino’s question was disrespectful, Pino claimed that the visiting lecturer was not being respectful to him, and accused Israel of killing people. Pino left the auditorium, calling out “Death to Israel.”

KSU President Lester A. Lefton condemned Pino’s actions as “reprehensible” and “an embarrassment to our university.” The Jerusalem Post reports that Lefton’s statements were praised by the ADL for their clarity. A statement from the National Conference on Jewish Affairs was less equivocal, including the following:

“We are appalled that such a man should remain in a position of leadership, especially one that molds the minds of young people and our future citizens. Such blood-curdling, inciting rhetoric — calling for the death of an entire people — may be acceptable in certain countries in the Middle East, but is unacceptable here in America.”

The behavior of radical imams has drawn attention from the FBI and law enforcement, and it is a disgrace that Pino should be allowed to influence young minds. Nine years ago, on the KSU campus newspaper, he praised Ayat al-Akhras, a young female Palestinian suicide bomber who murdered two people in an Israeli supermarket. He described her as a “martyr.”

On his Facebook page, Pino has an avatar of Ulrike Meinhof, the leftist German terrorist. He claims that Meinhof inspired him. He lists others who have inspired him, including leftist ideologues, as well as murders, mass-murderers and their supporters such as Maximilien Robespierre, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ayatollah Fadlallah (a guru to Hezbollah who supported murder of Israeli civilians), Assata Shakur, Mao Tsedung and Lin Baio. He also claims to be “inspired” by murderous fictional characters portrayed by Al Pacino: Michael Corleone (Godfather) and Tony Montana (Scarface).

If this were the Facebook page of a young student with no experience of the real world, such provocative choices would be par for the course. But for a lecturer in his early fifties, this is immature grandstanding, a sign of either someone who is seriously abnormal or someone who is trying to impress naïf students.

Allowing open support for terrorism and anti-Semitism on any campus gives the impression that terrorism and Jew-hatred are somehow “legitimate.” Would the university employ a lecturer who called for the “death of Saudi Arabia,” or declared that people who argued for the killing of Muslims were an “inspiration”? While Pino remains as a tenured professor, Kent State University disgraces itself.

Anti-Semitism and the British Left

The left in the United Kingdom has been hijacked by the pro-Palestinian, anti-war movement for so long that for the most part, being a leftist in Britain is almost synonymous with “anti-Zionism” and pro-Islamist viewpoints. There is only one UK political blog on the left that is opposed to anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, and also opposed to Islamism.

The New Statesman has always been a traditionally leftist magazine. Until last year, under the editorship of Martin Bright (who now writes for the Jewish Chronicle), it was quick to identify and condemn any UK government support for anti-Semitic Islamist groups. More recently, under the editorship of Mehdi Hasan who lacks his predecessor’s journalistic skills, the New Statement’s viewpoint is becoming less distinct. Hasan, a Shia Muslim, gained notoriety for comparing non-Muslims to “cattle.”

However, even in its current incarnation, the New Statesman cannot ignore the blatant anti-Semitism that is almost fashionable in Britain. An article there, by Rob Marchant, is entitled “Anti-Semitism is the New Black,” and shows how members of the trade union movement are freely giving vent to their anti-Jewish feelings. An excerpt:

Oh, how fashionable it is all becoming. A month ago, enfant terrible designer John Galliano was fined over an anti-Semitic tirade at a Paris restaurant. But his drug-addled ramblings were just the latest signs of a wider trend.

There are numerous recent incidents -- ranging from an unpleasant flavour of anti-Israeli activism to straightforward racism -- that should sound alarm bells for the liberals among us. For example, take the odd promotion of renowned Jewish conspiracy theorist Gilad Atzmon's book on the Times' website. Or the "ugly" barracking of Israeli musicians during a London concert for the heinous crime of, er, being Israeli. Or a racist incident involving a Jewish student at St Andrews University.

But there's a new twist on the ideological catwalk. We can visualise far-right thugs indulging in this kind of thing but somehow we don't expect it from our comrades on the supposedly liberal-left.

Read the rest here.

Occupy Wall Street: Al-Jazeera and Anti-Semitic Bias

There is no doubt that anti-Semitism has been a feature of some of the “Occupy” protests. Various reports have covered this unpleasant aspect of the protests. But Qatari-based AL-Jazeera will have none of it. Publishing an article on its website entitled: “Occupy protest critics exploit anti-Semitism,” the innate bias of the channel is displayed. Denial of anti-Semitism in the face of evidence, such as happens all too frequently with the Holocaust, is a form of active anti-Semitism, masking itself behind a veneer of “critical inquiry.”

Having a Jewish writer, M. J. Rosenberg, more usually associated with Huffington Post and Media Matters, in no way diminishes the taint of such an article. According to Rosenberg:

“Panicked conservatives are labeling the Occupy protests as 'anti-Semitic' in an attempt to break up the movement.”

An ugly old tradition is back: Exploiting anti-Semitism to break the backs of popular movements that threaten the power of the wealthiest one per cent of our population. It is being used to undermine the Occupy Wall Street movement, which has conservatives in a state of near panic.

There is no panic. Certainly no panic as great as the media panic that accompanied the Tea Party protests last year, which were not engaged in occupying other people’s space. Perhaps if, like those at Zuccotti Square, Muslims had been given their own space, the Tea Party would not have been so disproportionately vilified by America’s liberal media.

Italy: Anti-Semitism on the Rise

An article by Soeren Kern at the Hudson Institute, entitled “Runaway Anti-Semitism Trampling Italy” makes for alarming reading. An excerpt:

A jarring 44% of Italians are prejudiced or hostile towards Jews, according to a new research study released by the Italian Parliament on October 17.

The report, titled "Final Document: Investigation on Anti-Semitism," was commissioned by the Committee for the Inquiry into Anti-Semitism of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of the Italian Parliament. The 50-page document is the culmination of more than two years of research and parliamentary hearings.

The inquiry found that nearly half of all Italians say they feel no sympathy whatsoever toward the Jews. There has also been an exponential proliferation of anti-Semitic Internet websites and social networks in Italy. Moreover, the level of hatred against the State of Israel in many cases passes the limits of legitimate criticism of Israeli policies and aims at the destruction of the Jews.

Read the rest here.

Swiss Muslims Exploit Nazi Labels

On Saturday, Muslims attended a rally in Bern, Switzerland, to counter Islamophobia. Instead of dealing with the issues that they felt constituted “prejudice” against them, the organizers opted for a gimmick that is just – offensive.

They chose to make yellow “badges” like those yellow cloth badges that Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany, badges that would later be associated with concentration camps and mass murder. It is a frequent device of Muslim leaders to compare their current “plight” with Jews in Nazi Germany. Sadly, those who try to make such false analogies never choose to condemn the open and legally-sanctioned discriminations against Jews and Christians that exist in Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia.

Such cheap attempts to garner “sympathy” also ignore the fact that while the Nazis gassed Jews, they also worked with Muslims. Haj AMin al-Husseini, the anti-Semitic Mufti of Jerusalem went to Germany in November 1941 and later worked closely with Adolph Eichmann. Husseini blocked a prisoner exchange in which 10,000 Jewish children could have been spared. The children ended up at Theresienstadt concentration camp. Husseini also formed the 13th Handschar Division of the Waffen SS in Bosnia, which was made up exclusively of Muslims.

The Pact of Omar, attributed to Caliph Omar, encouraged non-Muslims to adopt a position of subservience to Muslims, and the same Caliph purportedly instituted the law of Ghiyar, or differentiation. This stipulation – a subsewt of the Pact of Omar, required that Christians and Jews (in lands where Muslims were the dominant class) should wear identifying clothing. From the start of the Abbasid cynasty, such rules became enforced. And in the manner that Jews in Nazi Europe were made to wear yellow stars, Muslims were doing the same to Jews centuries earlier:

(8) They are required to wear distinctive clothing such as the ghiyar, a yellow patch on their dress, the Zunnar (girdle), and a tall and colored qualansuwa (headgear).


Britain: Muslims Call Politician a “Jewish Homosexual Pig”

Mike Freer, MP (Member of Parliament) for Finchley and Golders Green in North London, was doing outreach work at the North Finchley Mosque on Friday, October 28. According to the Daily Express and the Daily Mail, a small group of Muslim extremists, not usually connected to the mosque, threatened and insulted Freer, who is openly gay. The antagonists were linked to the group Muslims Against the Crusades, and they objected to the presence of a “homosexual in the House of Allah”. Online, the group had made threatening notes, making explicit mention of MP Stephen TImms, who had been stabbed by a Muslim fanatic, Roshara Choudary. On their website and also on Facebook, they posted these references to Timms while warning Freer and other politicians.

An online message stated:

“We warn Mike Freer and every other MP in Britain that their presence is no longer welcomed in any Muslim area and that examples such as Stephen Timms should serve as a piercing reminder of this.”

When Freer arrived at the mosque, he was physically threatened, and had to be hidden. Freer is not Jewish, but he is a member of the political group called “Conservative Friends of Israel.” Freer said:

“I was made aware that a woman member of the mosque had started a campaign against me. She came into the surgery as a constituent but also with a gang of others from outside the area who started haranguing me and screaming abuse calling me a Jewish homo pig.”

Adrian Morgan, The Editor, Family Security Matters