Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts

Saturday, February 9, 2013

The Clock Is Ticking…..

Are we reaching out to our veterans to encourage them to share with our younger generation what it meant to fight for this country and just why we did?

The story comes from Family Security Matters.



The Clock Is Ticking…..

I was like many other teenagers in my youth -- a little bit rebellious and very immature with that feeling of superiority that said that I was somehow smarter than my elders, who seemed to have antiquated thought processes about life and politics. I remember listening to my father talk to family and friends about politics and life in general, thinking silently about how much I disagreed and how far out of touch they really were. I distanced myself as much as possible from those discussions, yet I heard enough to help guide me later in life, even though I did not recognize it at the time.

I seem to remember reading somewhere that age brings with it a certain amount of wisdom born from maturity and experience. I voted for the first time after I was married at the age of twenty-seven, and have voted in every election since. Somehow it just suddenly seemed important.

Issues that I rarely (if ever) thought about before -- taxes; local, state, and federal governments; foreign policy -- all started to matter.

During my forties I began to take an interest in other things that I previously hadn't cared about. My father was a World War II veteran, but the war was something Dad never spoke of and I had no incentive to ask him about it. Yet at this point in my life, I wanted to learn more. I began to read news articles pertaining to major wartime anniversaries and to watch many of the documentaries that still air on some of the cable channels today. I purchased videotapes and DVDs that chronicled the entire war and were said to be historically accurate. I found that I was amazed by the courage and sacrifices of men and women from a time that seemed so distant. Yes, I had read about WWII in grade and high school. Yes, I had seen the evening news when it covered the anniversaries of events like Pearl Harbor, D-Day, and more. I vaguely remember seeing a lot of coverage of those events in my youth, yet it hadn't fully sunk in. I never really understood it before - but it seems that a seed had at least taken root.

Unfortunately, as I entered my late forties and early fifties my father became somewhat frail. He knew his time was limited. Mom had passed away some ten years prior to this, and the need to review his important personal effects weighed heavily on him. As we searched through documents together, my attention was drawn to his discharge papers which listed many of the places he had been. "You were at Normandy?" That was the question that got him talking. I learned of his landing at Normandy. I learned that he had fought in the hedgerows in France. I learned that his patrol had helped to free Allied soldiers who had been captured earlier as they moved inland from Normandy. I learned that his unit has been ordered to the Ardennes, but that they were delayed and thus missed being a part of the Battle of the Bulge.

Perhaps that was the final lesson that my Father taught me: to learn from those who have age and experience on their side, and to ask questions because they may be too humble to volunteer information.

Much of my family is now deceased. I wonder what memories they held dear, and how much I could have learned from them. They lived through times that were amazing as they progressed from the days of the horse and buggy, with no indoor plumbing, no electricity, and no telephones, to missions to the moon and beyond. They were challenged by the Great Depression and one or even two World Wars. They experienced some of the best that mankind has to offer, and some of the most horrific as well.

I was fortunate to be able to tap into a few small pieces of their experiences once I recognized the value of what they knew. Many of today's youth (as well as many too old to be called young) have never had that opportunity. They do not necessarily understand how evil people can be, and how precarious freedom and life itself can become. They know only a relative peace, plenty of food and water, I-Phones and computers -- a life without the true challenges of the past. To them places like North Korea and Iran are distant lands which surely cannot affect our lives and safety, probably much like those who thought little about Nazi Germany and Hitler's rise to power. What is that quote...?

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

Today's wars need not be instigated by a strong leader with a powerful coalition of countries. Today's wars need not rely on invasion, nor fought in the forests of a foreign land. They can be initiated by one rogue state without a single soldier leaving their borders. Today's wars can be fought with the flip of a switch -- a single nuclear warhead detonated high above the United States would create a subsequent electromagnetic pulse which would not only change our lives forever, but could change the world order within seconds. It would be the Pearl Harbor of our times, but at a much higher cost.

We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes that led to the rise of Nazi Germany and the Axis powers. One way of avoiding those mistakes is to tap into the memories of our Greatest Generation who remain. They can provide a unique perspective on current events and the newer challenges and risks that exist in today's world; not to frighten us, but to help us understand that there are very real risks and threats, and there are things we can do to effect change and be prepared. They saw the rise of evil many years ago. Are they seeing it again now? How do they feel we should proceed? We may not initially like the answers we hear, but their point of view -- born of courage, sacrifice, and blood -- must be considered.

We also must carry their legacy forward. We need to try to accurately pass their stories on to new generations -- not to glorify war, but to ensure that future generations understand what we have so often heard: "Freedom is never free." We owe them that and so much more.

What of my father? He passed away unexpectedly this past Thanksgiving eve. He had made all of his funeral arrangements long ago, but he did not have them set in stone. I was able to make one important change -- he was buried with the full military honors he deserved.

The clock is ticking. We lose many of those who saved the world from tyranny each and every day. They have so much more to share with us. Are we willing to listen? Our future may depend on it.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Three Vietnamese Face Death By Firing Squad For Wanting To Bring Democracy To The Socialist Republic of Vietnam


Can you imagine if America put those on trial that wished to bring Communism to America? Hell, half of Congress would be in that defendants' box! Well, the Vietnamese are sending a pretty strong signal that they aren't going to put up with anyone in that country even thinking about bringing democracy to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam - four persons accused of just that are standing trial for treason and three of them face the death penalty for it. If convicted, they would stand before a firing squad and have their dreams of freedom extinguished.

From the report at Breitbart:


A human rights lawyer facing a possible death sentence testified Wednesday that he broke Vietnam's subversion law, saying he had been influenced by Western ideas about democracy and freedom while studying in the United States.
Le Cong Dinh, one of the country's best-known lawyers, is among four activists accused of working with Vietnamese exiles to promote a multiparty democracy in Vietnam, which the ruling Communist Party considers treason.

Three of the four defendants in the trial, which began Wednesday morning, could be sentenced to death by firing squad. The fourth, who is being tried as an accomplice, could face 15 years imprisonment.

This is a stark reminder of just why I constantly sound the alarm about the communistic plans and goals of those in the United States that want this same sort of oppression for our country. The article talks about Dinh being "influenced" by Western ideas...hell, say it like it is...he got a taste of FREEDOM! It is absolutely beyond me how any American citizen would want any form of this Marxist, socialist and/or communistic form of tyranny for you can see first hand that it's truly not about what's good for all - it's about what is good for a few and misery for the multitudes.

Some coming to this site might grow tired of my calls for protection of personal liberties and individual property rights...but this is exactly why I hammer on it. Once you begin to give up those rights and liberties, they rarely come back. When you decide to turn over your personal rights to something as personal as the well-being of your own body's health, you have taken a step towards this firing squad.

Dinh's biggest mistake was coming to America. He found out the truth. He tasted freedom. I liken it to a silver fox raised for its fur. A silver fox raised in a 2' x 2' cage for its fur has no idea of what its life would have been like in nature - it was born in that cage, it is raised in that cage and it dies in that cage - at no point in time does it "long" to be running through the fields or woods in pursuit of rabbits...it has no idea...its world has been and is that cage. Dinh left his cage. And now he will die for it.


Vietnam puts 4 democracy activists on trial


HO CHI MINH CITY, Vietnam (AP) - A human rights lawyer facing a possible death sentence testified Wednesday that he broke Vietnam's subversion law, saying he had been influenced by Western ideas about democracy and freedom while studying in the United States.
Le Cong Dinh, one of the country's best-known lawyers, is among four activists accused of working with Vietnamese exiles to promote a multiparty democracy in Vietnam, which the ruling Communist Party considers treason.

Three of the four defendants in the trial, which began Wednesday morning, could be sentenced to death by firing squad. The fourth, who is being tried as an accomplice, could face 15 years imprisonment.

The trial comes as factions jockey for power in advance of next year's Communist Party congress, and some observers have speculated that the current crackdown on dissent is connected to the upcoming political transition. Vietnam has convicted 10 other democracy activists in the last three months.

None of them is better known than Dinh. In addition to handling high-profile human rights cases, he once represented Vietnamese fish farmers fighting an unfair trade complaint brought by U.S. catfish growers. During closing arguments at a 2007 human rights trial in Hanoi, Dinh made a highly unusual public plea for freedom of expression.

Prosecutors said the defendants on trial Wednesday had committed "an extremely serious" national security crime by joining the outlawed Democratic Party of Vietnam and collaborating with overseas Vietnamese groups dedicated to ousting the communists. They were prosecuted under Article 79 of Vietnam's criminal code, which prohibits "carrying out activities aimed at overthrowing the people's administration."

As the proceedings began, two of the defendants denied wrongdoing, but two others, including Dinh, said they had broken the law.

"My actions were in violation of Article 79, specifically, participating in the Democratic Party of Vietnam, whose purpose was to call for a multiparty system, political pluralism and a new state," said Dinh, 41. It was unclear why Dinh acknowledged wrongdoing, but he may have been hoping for a more lenient sentence.

Dinh, the former vice chairman of the Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association, studied law at Tulane University in Louisiana on a Fulbright scholarship.

"During my studies overseas, I was influenced by Western attitudes toward democracy, freedom and human rights," Dinh testified.

He acknowledged receiving a draft of a proposed new Vietnamese constitution and attending a three-day seminar on nonviolent political change in Thailand.

The seminar was organized by Viet Tan, an international pro-democracy network with members inside and outside Vietnam. The government considers Viet Tan a terrorist organization, but U.S. officials say there is no evidence to support that view.

On the eve of Wednesday's trial, Viet Tan issued a statement condemning the "arbitrary charges" against the defendants, saying they were simply exercising their right to promote nonviolent change.

Also testifying Wednesday was Nguyen Tien Trung, who formed a student group called Viet Youth for Democracy in 2006 while studying information technology in France. During his visits to the West, he once met former U.S. President George W. Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

In his testimony, Trung said he regretted joining the Democratic Party of Vietnam and forming the youth group.

"My actions violated Vietnamese law," said Trung, 26. "I was immature and made a mistake. I deeply regret it."

The other two defendants, both Internet entrepreneurs, denied wrongdoing and said they had only signed confessions under duress.

Tran Huynh Duy Thuc, 43, acknowledged organizing something called the Chan Study Group, which prosecutors say was committed to undermining the government. But Thuc said the group was simply formed to do research and make policy suggestions to Vietnamese leaders.

Le Thang Long, 42, acknowledged joining the study group, but said it was lawful.

"I'm innocent," Long said, testifying that he had been subjected to "psychological terrorism" by the security police.

It is virtually unheard of for political defendants to be acquitted in Vietnam. The main issue to be determined at trial involves the length of the sentence.

Foreign reporters and diplomats watched the trial in a separate room at the court on a closed-circuit television that was sometimes inaudible. They were prohibited from bringing cameras or recording devices.

New York-based Human Rights Watch condemned the proceedings, which are scheduled to end Thursday.

"Vietnam's hostility toward freedom of expression and peaceful dissent is becoming increasingly flagrant in the run-up to next year's party congress," said Brad Adams, the organization's Asia director. "Vietnam should stop criminalizing and imprisoning government critics."

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Freedom Isn't Free


There is nothing much I can add to this post from Knottie's Niche - I encourage you all to visit Knottie's blog regularly as she has insights on the Iraq War that none of us can have. I only want to add the header quote of Knottie's blog page:

Ramblings of a Gold Star mom who still loves and supports the troops and their mission.

Here is "Waiting for Pokey":



Waiting for Pokey

I don't think about the day Pokey came home much. But tonight something has triggered the memory and emotions. There is a movie out called "Taking Chance" I read the story years ago and it was emotional then.

On Feb. 24th, 2008 my son, David, was home alone. My husband was at work. My daughter had gone to church and my youngest and I were at walmart doing the weekly shopping. When my son David called I thought he was going to ask for flaming hot cheetos. I answered the call with "I have your cheetos in the cart already" and laughed. He was so serious and scared. " Mom two guys from the army are here' No not recruiters. I knew then. Oh I tried to convince myself they came when they were hurt but I knew better. I called my husband to met me at the house.

"On behalf of the United States Army, We regret to inform you, Your son Micheal E Phillips was killed this morning when the vehicle he was driving encountered an IED." For some reason I remember their words exactly. I turned and hugged my son and he for the first time in a long time hugged me back. A few minutes later my husband arrived and they repeated the words. After the paperwork was signed and offers help and comfort were made and we were told what the next step would be they left. A short time later my daughter came home. I will never rid my memory of her wail begging for it to be a mistake.

Then the waiting began. People came. They brought food and flower. The family arrived and we all waited together. We planned the funeral. Cried with his friends. Answered phone calls from his brothers in Iraq. But still time seemed to have stopped. We waited for Micheal to come home to us and hoped with every fiber that the wait meant they made the mistake my daughter begged for. The waiting is the hardest part they say and they are right. The numb of shock slow starts to wear off while you wait. You have far too much time to dwell on the memories, the lost dreams. All you can do is sit and wait and hope that someday you remember the words people are speaking in those day because in those moments you comprehend so very little. You just wait...

7 days we waited before we loaded into a limousine and drove to the airport. We were escorted by PGR and sheriff dept. I have no idea how many but the line was at least a mile of just the motorcycles. We stood in the hangar and wait the final few minutes for the plane to land. The honor guard took it's place and the door opened on the plane. A flag draped casket emerged and my son was home. No mistake. We closed ranks and breathed in deep to get through the moment. It was in my mind the hardest moment we have faced so far. The hope was gone but he was home. I will never forget the look of anger on David's face. Pure hot anger. He too realized it was time to face the truth... he had lost his brother and best friend. Our Pokey would not come home to parties and hugs. But to a funeral and tears.

The waiting was over....