Showing posts with label Green Movement in Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Green Movement in Iran. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Why Does Obama Side With the Iranian Mullahs and Not the Grassroots Movement In Iran?






With each day, we in the United States can sit back and want to kick ourselves more and more for not lending more of a hand to the uprising in Iran a couple of years ago - this forerunner of the "Arab Spring" was left to hang out there, was left to be suppressed by the Ayatollah and the mullahs and the Revolutionary Guard.  Let me correct that.... WE don't want to kick ourselves....we want to kick Barack Hussein Obama...because it was our dear Leader who made the choice - he chose to support Khamenei and Ahmadinejad and let the democracy-seeking people die.


This article from Family Security Matters details all of the atrocities of the Iranian regime...how that regime has worked tirelessly to strike at the heart of America over the decades.   And it points the deserving finger of blame at Barack Hussein Obama.



Obama Iran Policy Contradicts Interests of Iranian Grassroots


For decades, the United States has been among the countries that have suffered massively from the Islamic Republic of Iran's (IRI's) sponsorship of terrorism worldwide. It all started in 1979 when the Islamic regime ordered the seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran in which 66 Americans were held hostage for 444 days.

Later in 1983, the suicide bombing of U.S. military barracks in Beirut executed by the Islamic Jihad Organization, an Iranian regime's terror proxy, left 299 Americans dead. The Khobar Towers bombing in 1996 carried out by IRI-supported groups of Hezbollah resulted in death of 19 U.S. service men. 60% of all American combat casualties in Iraq and 50% of combat casualties in Afghanistan have been caused by IRI-made IEDs. More importantly the footprint of IRI's terrorism in America became more apparent when the U.S. District Court ruled that Iran was behind the 9/11 Attacks.

American soldiers bring hope and leave graves in every corner of the world; they take bullets to protect the national interests of the country. Their lives are shattered to keep democracy alive. To a Commander-in-Chief, they are like his family members and their deaths are indirectly a loss of a family member to him. Mr. President, you don't negotiate and you don't deal with the terrorists who continuously murder your family members, you should do exactly what must be done with the murderers: hold them accountable by arresting and putting them on trial. That is what a Commander-in-Chief, who cares about the lost lives of his soldiers, does.

The bitterer tragedy of the IRI's sponsorship of terrorism has been the mark it has made on its domestic victims, the Iranian people inside the country, who have been under the systematic use of terror as a means of coercion by this terrorist state from its get-go. The Cinema Rex fire was the first act of genocide of the IRI shortly before it came to power, which resulted in the burning to death of over 400 innocent individuals. As the IRI came to power, the regime started mass executing the top officials from the predecessor government. In 1988, an act of violence unprecedented in Iranian history, was committed by the genocidal regime of Iran, the systematic execution of thousands of political prisoners across the country, which lasted for about five continuous months and resulted in the killing of as many as 30,000 prisoners. Any democratic government in the world is established based on its people's will; the Islamic government in Iran, by contrast, is run and carried on by imposing terror, violence, and fear among its public. The regime has fortified its hold on power by resorting to arbitrary arrests, detentions, rapes, torture, and extrajudicial executions. The "alarming" rise in Iran's extrajudicial execution rate has underscored the warning sign of mass atrocities in the country, a clear indication of the regime's ongoing silent genocide of political, social, ethnic, and religious groups. Additionally, the Iranian regime maintains a policy of "religious Apartheid" toward religious minorities in Iran - like the Christians, Baha'is and Zoroastrians, amongst others. Similarly, the regime advocates "sexual apartheid" in the country, where women and men are segregated from each other and women are deprived of their rights.

Mr. President, The mass murders in Iran have outrageously taken place on the watch of six U.S. presidents - Carter, Reagan, Clinton, GHW Bush, GW Bush, and Obama, yet none of those presidents has done anything beyond rhetorical condemnation against the atrocity, genocide, and apartheid acts of the IRI regime. Over the past few decades, the international community, including the U.S., has largely stood by and watched while mass atrocities in Iran occurred. The lack of leaders bothered by their conscience and the lack of effective response options has sapped the will of governments in responding to these unprecedented crimes against humanity.

Sovereignty is not a privilege but a responsibility that should be revoked if a regime commits acts of atrocity and genocide against its own people. Now is the time for the international communities to protect the rights of the oppressed Iranian people and save them from the long-drawn-out genocide in Iran by putting an end to the sovereignty of the IRI regime, which indeed belongs to the grassroots people of Iran.

Mr. President, the above-mentioned atrocious acts occurred when the IRI was still far from the nuclear threshold. How, then, is an Iranian regime emboldened by nuclear acquisition likely to behave? For more than a decade Americans have heard from different U.S. presidents that an Iranian nuclear weapon is "unacceptable." Despicably, nothing more than a protracted approach of incrementally tightened nonpolitical sanctions with Iranian people as its main burdened target, and diplomacy with the regime for a containment routine, have been utilized to stop the IRI's nuclear threat.

Years, if not decades, of diplomacy have led nowhere; consequently Iran blusters, threatens, and continues to work furiously to obtain nuclear weapons, with the patent support of Russia and China. Mr. President, as a result of your promise to "embrace a new era of engagement" with America's enemies, each passing day this potentially antagonistic regime is getting closer to witnessing a celebration in Tehran for the testing its first atomic bomb. The IRI Mullahs believe it is their responsibility to bring about nuclear war to facilitate the coming of the last Islamic Messiah.

Such a theocratic regime that values martyrdom more than life, even if lacks the technology for building the nuclear warhead, when the time calls, the IRI hardliners and fanatic leaders can easily promote the proliferation of dirty nuclear bombs and make them available in the hands of their terrorist proxies across the world. Any type of negotiation with the terrorist IRI regime not only undermines the repressive measures of the regime against its people but would passively underpin the acceptance of the perpetual IRI nuclear blackmail. Only adopting a policy of collapsing the power structure of the terrorist regime of IRI would put an end to its escalating nuclear threat.

Mr. President, during the Iranian uprising in June 2009 you abandoned the oppressed people of Iran when they asked for your support. Furthermore you chose to take sides with the terrorists and extended your outstretched hand to the eradicator regime of IRI. Mr. President, you don't negotiate with a regime that commits act of atrocities and genocide against its own people, maintains a policy of apartheid inside the country, sponsors terrorism across the globe, has ties to Al Qaida, throws threats at the regional states, interferes in the affairs of neighboring countries, attacks U.S. interests anywhere in the world, kills the best men of United States Armed Forces, and pursues acquiring a nuclear arsenal. The outcome of such negotiations and diplomacy would only help to strengthen the terrorists and to passively legitimize their actions.

Iranians today are the least religious people in comparison to the public of other Muslim countries, and the trend in their value orientations is towards individual freedom, civil rights, gender equality, democracy, and national identity. While the voices in Iran call for an end to Iran's religious regime, sadly, ongoing efforts have been observed in the West, which undermine those voices as if they are unheard. The paid lobbyists of IRI reformers have been busy lobbying political officials and lawmakers in foreign states to clean up the mullahs' messes by presenting to them showcases of fabricated data on IRI's records in favor of the regime for undermining its committed crimes, its sponsorship of terrorism, and its nuclear threats, and also to promote the cause for the reform of the Islamic regime.

These IRI lobbyists have ties to U.S. lawmakers and have infiltrated the White House, Congress, the State Department, and the main decision-making centers of the U.S. government. They have managed to influence and shape the U.S. government policy towards the Islamic regime in Iran in favor of the IRI reformers, who are part of the regime.

The grassroots people of Iran under no circumstances recognize either the IRI reformers nor their lobbyists as their representatives. In their struggle for democracy they reject any kind of reformed version of the theocratic regime; rather they are striving for securing a secular democratic government based on the principle of human rights. The question is why are the bureaucracies in Washington partnering with IRI lobbyists and the IRI reformers and not with the democracy promoting the political forces of Iran? Why isn't the U.S. administration clearly and forcefully supporting the secular Iranian grassroots opposition? The grassroots opposition of Iran needs the support of the world behind them, direct and indirect, logistic and strategic. Global backing of the Iranian grassroots can result in the collapse of the IRI regime if it is accompanied by a concurrent paralyzing of its power structure through imposing severe and effective political sanctions.

Mr. President, to make a long story short, if your policy in dealing with the Iran dilemma continues to be the status quo, I can regrettably assure you it will cost you Iranian support going forward.

Family Security Matters Contributing Editor Dr. Mansur Rastani is a freelance writer and a faculty member at NCSU, NCA&TSU and CSUM and worked as a researcher at NASA, the Jet Propulsion Lab and other governmental agencies. He grew up in Iran and can be reached through his website http://mansurrastani.wordpress.com.

Monday, February 14, 2011

It's On In the Streets of Iran Again


The protesters in Iran who were finally subdued and persecuted for their last demonstrations over fraudulent elections in 2009 have reinvigorated and took to the streets again in several Iranian cities today.

There are videos coming out left and right now and I have viewed several and the turnout seems much larger than this report from Fox News reveals. As I like to say, "it's on again." And now the whole world gets to see what Barack Hussein Obama is going to do THIS time around with Iranian protests - the timing isn't good for Obama since he fully supported the overthrow of the Mubarak regime, what happens if he sticks to his guns and supports the Ayatollah and mullahs and Ahmadinejad again this time AGAINST the Iranian people? It's gonna be fun. For sure.

I personally think we are going to see Obama keep silent for quite some time on Iran - he's going to go into hiding and let any communications come from Hillary Clinton and some lame ass responses from his press people. If the Iranian thing fizzles for the demonstrators or if it actually took hold and looked bad for the goat fucking mullahs, then Obama will appear in daylight and try to take some credit.



Mideast Revolution Sparks Pro-Democracy Protest in Iran


Pro-democracy advocates took to the streets of Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz and other cities in Iran on Monday, just days after the Islamic Republic celebrated its 32nd anniversary.

It’s not clear how many protesters may have been involved, as securing reliable information from Iran is quite difficult. Some reports are that thousands came out in protest, but those reports are difficult to confirm. Iranian journalists are barred from reporting on anti-government demonstrations, and most foreign reporters are kept out of the country altogether.

But several witness accounts trickling out of the country, together with limited photos and amateur video, suggest the police presence at the demonstrations was extremely heavy, that there were clashes between security forces and marchers, and that tear gas was deployed. In their overexcitement, some bloggers apparently exaggerated events.

Videos posted on YouTube showed people chanting “Death to the Dictator,” and “Mubarak, Ben Ali, now it’s your turn Seyyed Ali (meaning Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.)”. Fox was not able to independently verify the tapes, but they do reinforce the fact that Iranian protests today, as they were in 2009, were about political rather than economic issues.

Western officials reacted to the reports of the protests.

“I have seen reports today of peaceful demonstrators being assaulted by Iranian security forces,” Britain’s Foreign Secretary William Hague said in a statement. “President Ahmadinejad last Friday told the Egyptian people that they had the right to express their own views about their country. I call on the Iranian authorities to allow their own people the same right and to ensure that the security authorities exercise restraint.”

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, speaking to Fox News on Monday, said, “I think it’s very important that we stand up now for those people who want to protest for freedom and proper democratic elections in Iran.”

Blair also highlighted the significance change in Iran would have.

“I think it would be,” he said, “possibly the single most dramatic change in the whole of the region because you would then have Iran playing a constructive part. You would have Iran not trying to destabilize other countries in the region, and arming militia-type groups.”

After the Iranian regime attempted to spin the Egyptian protests as being similar to the Islamic Revolution in 1979, throwing off a U.S. backed strongman, Washington responded with a dig at Tehran’s hypocrisy. National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said, “For all its empty talk about Egypt, the government of Iran should allow the Iranian people the same universal right to peacefully assemble, demonstrate and communicate in Tehran that the people are exercising in Cairo.”

The protests are not contained to Iran. In Bahrain, a tiny Gulf kingdom with a Shi’ite majority ruled by a Sunni minority, tens of thousands took to the streets to protest Sunday night and Monday, according to Nabeel Rajab, a leading human rights activist.

“The wall of fear has been broken”, he said. “People have more confidence in the region.” He said, “we never thought a U.S.-backed dictatorship in the region could be changed.” Rajab said he has not seen such crowds of women and children out on the streets in a long time.

But Rajab said there were lots of injuries, and that police deployed shotguns Sunday night and rubber bullets and tear gas on Monday. He said some of the injured did not dare go to the hospital for fear of being arrested there.

He said there were special forces, including some “foreign mercenaries” out on the streets to control the protests.

There were protests in Yemen Monday as well. Thousands came out for a fourth straight day. Protesters shouted, “A revolution of freedom …We should decide!” Yemen’s President Ali Abdullah Saleh has vowed not to run again for President in 2013. But some Yemenis say they have heard that before. And Saleh has made such promises in the past, only to change his mind.

Many have questioned today why Egypt was able to overthrow its dictator, but Iranians have not managed to make changes in their regime. Egypt’s military, in a way, protected the protesters on Tahrir Square.

Iran’s security services have done the opposite, as witnessed from the bloody results of the first wave of protests in Iran in 2009. But as a leading Iranian human rights advocate told Fox News last week, large numbers of security on the streets Monday will indicate the level of fear the regime has of a movement that may not always show itself on the streets, but which is very much alive.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Iranian Opposition Parties Try To Rekindle Revolt After Egyptian Movement, Iranian Regime Tries To Squash It


The Iranian opposition leaders who helped organize the huge attempt at revolution in Iran in 2009 following the corrupted election results have now begun to try and reorganize that effort after watching the dramatic upheaval in Egypt. And the tyrannical theocratic regime of the Ayatollah and mullahs will have nothing to do with it. The radical islamists who organized the "peoples" revolution in 1979 have now firmly come down on the side of not allowing the people any voice in what happens in modern day Iran.

From the story at Reuters via Breitbart:

Iranian authorities have stepped up pressure on pro-democracy movement supporters to prevent a revival of anti-government protests, opposition websites said on Sunday after the arrest of 18 activists before a planned rally.

State authorities refused permission requested by opposition leaders Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi to stage a rally on February 14 in solidarity with the people of Egypt and Tunisia who toppled their presidents in popular uprisings.

But the opposition websites renewed the call for the rally, defying pressure tactics employed against the opposition, such as the placing of Karroubi under house arrest since Wednesday.

"Increased pressure on Karroubi and Mousavi ... shows weakness and fear of the rulers over Iranians' most peaceful, civil and political moves," Mousavi's website Kaleme said.

Karroubi's website, Sahamnews, said "a new wave of arrests has started as we are getting close to Monday's rally," publishing a list of detained 18 activists.

This all plays in to my last post about the upcoming Palestinian elections that Hamas has decided NOT to participate in - and this is why this American liberal media pipe dream of democracy in Muslim countries is so hysterical. What the liberal press in America just doesn't seem to get is this - that only in Western countries, only in those democracies (or democratic republics) will the party or leaders in power willingly turn over power after legitimately losing an election.

There literally is only one Muslim country that is an exception and that is Turkey - where power has shifted from time to time based upon elections but we must remember that the Turkish constitution demands that the government be secular. That is the key.

I am convinced that if the Iranian opposition leaders are successful in reinvigorating the demonstrations against the mullah regime, the end result will be extremely bloody. And the spotlight will REALLY come down on Barack Hussein Obama - how will it be possible for him to sit on his thumbs this time like he did in 2009? Especially after Obama sided with the people in Egypt.



Iran pressures opposition ahead of planned rally


(Reuters) - Iranian authorities have stepped up pressure on pro-democracy movement supporters to prevent a revival of anti-government protests, opposition websites said on Sunday after the arrest of 18 activists before a planned rally.

State authorities refused permission requested by opposition leaders Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi to stage a rally on February 14 in solidarity with the people of Egypt and Tunisia who toppled their presidents in popular uprisings.

But the opposition websites renewed the call for the rally, defying pressure tactics employed against the opposition, such as the placing of Karroubi under house arrest since Wednesday.

"Increased pressure on Karroubi and Mousavi ... shows weakness and fear of the rulers over Iranians' most peaceful, civil and political moves," Mousavi's website Kaleme said.

Karroubi's website, Sahamnews, said "a new wave of arrests has started as we are getting close to Monday's rally," publishing a list of detained 18 activists.

Tehran prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi said the "recent arrests were made over security-related issues."

Opposition leaders say the pro-democracy revolts in Egypt and Tunisia mirror the anti-government demonstrations that shook Iran in 2009, and not the 1979 Islamic Revolution that overthrew the shah, as maintained by the authorities.

Most opposition groups in Egypt, including the banned Muslim Brotherhood, have stressed the secular nature of their protests.

POST-ELECTION UNREST

Unrest erupted in Iran after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election in June 2009, a vote that the opposition says was rigged. Iranian authorities deny this.

The protests, the worst unrest since the Islamic Republic was founded, were quelled by the elite Revolutionary Guards. Mass detentions and trials followed and two people were hanged and scores of detainees remain in jail.

The opposition's call has gained momentum on social networking websites like Facebook, with more than 48,000 people pledging to participate on one protest group's Facebook page.

"Our meeting point is Azadi (Liberty) square on Monday," proclaims graffiti spray-painted on some walls, bus stations and newspaper stands in Tehran.

The Revolutionary Guards have repeatedly warned the opposition not to create another "security crisis."

Mousavi's Kaleme website said many student activists and political groups would join the rally. But it is unclear whether supporters of the opposition will turn out, analysts say.

"Mousavi and Karroubi are not considered as the opposition leaders by many Iranians ... Besides any confrontation with the system is very costly," said political analyst Rahmat Miraghai.

The last major opposition protest, in December 2009, led to clashes with security forces. Eight demonstrators were killed.

The government has taken extraordinary measures in the past few days, deploying security forces to the main squares in Tehran and erecting checkpoints in various parts of Tehran.

The authorities have portrayed the opposition movement as a foreign-backed plot to undermine the Islamic establishment, an accusation denied by opposition leaders.

They say the pro-democracy movement is alive in Iran and argue that the rally is a test for both the Iranian government and its opponents.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

What's Really Going On In Iran? Is the Regime On Its Last Legs?


Starting well before the "Green Revolution" that evolved from the last Iranian elections, we have seen signs that the regime in power, the mullah regime, is coming apart at the seams. And as this article from Family Security Matters points out, the unraveling is accelerating and now, some are even saying that it is a fight for survival amongst the powerful in Iran.

From the article:


It is hard to know where to begin with Iran these days. Many commentators are telling us that there is considerable “infighting” within the regime, which is certainly true. But so far I have not seen anyone point out that these conflicts are not merely political. We are witnessing, I believe, a struggle for survival, both within the regime and between the regime and the opposition. All those explosions — big explosions — at the natural gas pipelines running from Iran to Turkey, to Russia, and to Afghanistan cannot possibly be accidents. The latest took place last night (I haven’t seen press reports yet, perhaps because Ahmadinejad has ordered oil and gas facilities to censor any news about disasters), two of them: one at a petrochemical plant on an offshore island that destroyed a polyethylene plant and pipeline, the other against a pipeline from Bandar Abbas to Bushehr.

Other very obvious signs of the disintegration of regime coherence abound– such as the repeated calls from the Supreme Leader and the people around him for “unity” (a sure sign they don’t have any). Take, for example, the recent defections of Iranian diplomats based overseas. The two latest ones (one in Brussels, the other in Helsinki) were not merely disgruntled diplomats leaving their country’s foreign service; both proclaimed themselves followers of Mir Hossein Mousavi’s Green Movement, and both forecast that others would soon follow them into open opposition. We shall see.

And more: the divisions are so intense that Parliament has been closed for fifteen days, on top of the Ramadan holiday.

Whatever the Islamic Republic of Iran once was, it is no longer a source of enthusiasm for the Iranian people. They have had it. They know that the only thing the regime can do with any degree of efficiency is kill their own people. The latest stories revolve around the dreadful present in Mashhad, where hundreds of prisoners have been slaughtered in recent weeks. One of the sources for the story, Ahmad Ghabel, was thrown back into prison after he told the Green Movement what was going on.

The regime continues its efforts to intimidate the Greens, to no effect. Thugs attacked Karroubi’s home, shooting 30 or 40 times into the house and setting it on fire. Karroubi told them that death did not frighten him, and the outcry was so great that within two days the government announced the arrest of the guilty parties. Mousavi’s house is under siege, every visitor is interrogated by regime thugs, and yet Mrs. Mousavi comes and goes, issuing clarion calls on behalf of Iranian women, and Mousavi himself remains an outspoken opponent of the regime.
So, with all of the strife and violence and resistance going on in Iran, what is going to pan out? What is going to happen to this country still such a center of the world's attention? Well, the article's author has a couple of possible scenarios:


The first is that the Revolutionary Guards somehow get a grip on the country. It’s hard to imagine, but they do have lots of guns, and if they can kill hundreds of their own, they may well be willing to kill thousands of political opponents and normal citizens. I think the country has gone beyond the point where the tens of millions of suffering Iranians will put up with that again. But you never know.

The second scenario is that the regime implodes, unable to make decisions, unable to act decisively, and, as one key leader after the next goes over to the other side, the whole ugly thing collapses into the muck. Unlikely? Perhaps, but then it seemed even more unlikely back in the days of the Soviet Empire before it sank.
I, personally, think there is another scenario and that can be summed up by the term, expansion. The Iranian regime needs to do two thing: 1. they need to get some serious help for their economy and fast 2. they need to deflect their peoples' scorn from them onto something else.

So, I see the Iranian regime looking at Iraqi expansion - they will present themselves as protectors of the Shia majority in Iraq and will use their military defense of Iraq against the Sunni likes of al Qaeda as a method to start skimming the riches off of the Iraqi land. At the same time, Iran will seek to expand its influence around Israel. I look for the mullahs to try and expand their reach into a Hezbollah type operation in Syria and perhaps even in Jordan. They will try and unite their people against the great enemy, the Zionists. It's no secret that the regime has set up the whole nuclear issue as an "us against them" scenario which they have felt would unite the people behind them - that hasn't worked so well.

I've said it many times before...if we had a President in America worth his salt right now, we would see a real effort being made by the CIA and other international agencies to really undermine the Iranian regime - instead, we have literally seen the Obama administration prop up the regime. It's my belief that each and every one of the mullahs carries an airline ticket for a distant exile destination with them, with a nice little push by our operatives, they would all be heading for the airport.




Iran Sinks Into the Mud



It is hard to know where to begin with Iran these days. Many commentators are telling us that there is considerable “infighting” within the regime, which is certainly true. But so far I have not seen anyone point out that these conflicts are not merely political. We are witnessing, I believe, a struggle for survival, both within the regime and between the regime and the opposition. All those explosions — big explosions — at the natural gas pipelines running from Iran to Turkey, to Russia, and to Afghanistan cannot possibly be accidents. The latest took place last night (I haven’t seen press reports yet, perhaps because Ahmadinejad has ordered oil and gas facilities to censor any news about disasters), two of them: one at a petrochemical plant on an offshore island that destroyed a polyethylene plant and pipeline, the other against a pipeline from Bandar Abbas to Bushehr.

Moreover, there have been some open gunfights here and there, with casualties running well over 100. To round out this very ugly picture, the nastiest elements of the regime have been murdering their opponents. If you follow the reports, you will see that many people are being executed every day, and there are events far more terrible than those that have been reported. In the past five months, some seven hundred “dissident” Revolutionary Guards and Basiji have been executed under the guise of “drug smugglers,” and there is even worse than that: in the past few days about 30 dissident RGs in the Mashhad prison were told they had been forgiven, and would be reintegrated into the ranks. They were put on a bus and fed food and (poisoned) drinks. When they passed out they were dumped into a mass grave and buried, more or less alive. Astonishingly someone saw it, and reported it, and some fifty security officials are now being interrogated.

Other very obvious signs of the disintegration of regime coherence abound– such as the repeated calls from the Supreme Leader and the people around him for “unity” (a sure sign they don’t have any). Take, for example, the recent defections of Iranian diplomats based overseas. The two latest ones (one in Brussels, the other in Helsinki) were not merely disgruntled diplomats leaving their country’s foreign service; both proclaimed themselves followers of Mir Hossein Mousavi’s Green Movement, and both forecast that others would soon follow them into open opposition. We shall see.

And more: the divisions are so intense that Parliament has been closed for fifteen days, on top of the Ramadan holiday.

As most everyone has pointed out, the Sarah Shourd affair also shows deep fissures within the regime. First, Ahmadinejad ordered her release. Most likely, he wanted to take her on his airplane to New York, where he could present her to American authorities and then go on to meet with Pres. Obama. The Iranian judiciary put a stop to that, asserted their authority over all prisoners, and insisted she would stand trial along with her traveling companions. Then came the story of bail, a fantastically high bail of half a million dollars. In any case, it’s wonderful to see her free.

There are lots of unanswered questions, as usual in these matters. Did they compel her to sign some sort of confession? And what about the bail payment? On the face of it, any such payment would fly in the face of sanctions against Iranian banks, so one wants to know who paid it, and if there was any American complicity.

There may well be a missing link — call it the story of the other Sarah. In a letter to the Wall Street Journal today, Sarah Levinson laments that she is soon to be married and cannot share her joy with her father, Robert, the former FBI agent who disappeared in Iran three a and a half years ago. I have been told — although I can’t verify it — that Robert Levinson died in an Iranian prison a few months ago, and that the American government has come to that conclusion as well.

According to this version, the Iranian leaders did not want to have a second American die in their prisons, and so — just as they have been saying — the decision to release Sarah Shourd was indeed driven by serious concern about her health.

Then there is the geopolitical element: the regime leaders are very happy with President Obama and they do not wish to see him hamstrung. Ahmadinejad’s original idea was to try to help Obama (and help himself as well) by freeing the American woman, just as the leaders of the Islamic Republic did a favor for President Carter when they freed women and blacks in 1979, long before any white male was released from captivity.

In short, as an Iranian friend of mine put it, what we are witnessing is less a power struggle than a survival struggle. One other good way to see this at work is to look around the neighborhood. As Green leader Mehdi Karroubi said the other day in an interview with Al Arabiya TV, “the regime in Tehran depends on creating international and domestic crises to safeguard its existence and continuation.” And so we see explosions in Bahrain, bombs in Iraq, Kashmir and Afghanistan, and fighting in the streets of Iranian cities. Indeed, the internal conflict has reached such a point that one of Ahmadinejad’s top assistants finally came out and told the clergy to go back into their mosques. Banafsheh’s invaluable Planet-Iran was the only one to give this amazing statement the big font it deserves:

Mohammad-Ali Ramin, Deputy Minister of Islamic Guidance and Culture for Media Relations and Ahmadinejad’s adviser on the “Holocaust Commission” announced: “We call upon all clergy to abandon civic and politics issues, partisan matters, NGO’s and western-style organizations and return to the mosques where they can benefit from greater social clout, that will ultimately elevate societal and Islamic interests. We need to be able to put our clergy to proper use, as mosque attendance has thinned out.

Pay attention to that last clause. Whatever the Islamic Republic of Iran once was, it is no longer a source of enthusiasm for the Iranian people. They have had it. They know that the only thing the regime can do with any degree of efficiency is kill their own people. The latest stories revolve around the dreadful present in Mashhad, where hundreds of prisoners have been slaughtered in recent weeks. One of the sources for the story, Ahmad Ghabel, was thrown back into prison after he told the Green Movement what was going on.

The regime continues its efforts to intimidate the Greens, to no effect. Thugs attacked Karroubi’s home, shooting 30 or 40 times into the house and setting it on fire. Karroubi told them that death did not frighten him, and the outcry was so great that within two days the government announced the arrest of the guilty parties. Mousavi’s house is under siege, every visitor is interrogated by regime thugs, and yet Mrs. Mousavi comes and goes, issuing clarion calls on behalf of Iranian women, and Mousavi himself remains an outspoken opponent of the regime.

And then, in yet another surprising retreat from the policy of all out repression, the former Justice Minister has been called to stand trial for the mass murders that followed the demonstrations of last June.

How will this play out? I think there are two basic scenarios. The first is that the Revolutionary Guards somehow get a grip on the country. It’s hard to imagine, but they do have lots of guns, and if they can kill hundreds of their own, they may well be willing to kill thousands of political opponents and normal citizens. I think the country has gone beyond the point where the tens of millions of suffering Iranians will put up with that again. But you never know.

The second scenario is that the regime implodes, unable to make decisions, unable to act decisively, and, as one key leader after the next goes over to the other side, the whole ugly thing collapses into the muck. Unlikely? Perhaps, but then it seemed even more unlikely back in the days of the Soviet Empire before it sank.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Did Obama Make a Deal With Iran? Did He Allow Interpol Free Reign In America So the Iranians Could Use Them To Hunt Dissidents Here?


A fascinating article here at Europe News talks about the fact that the Iranians are using international police force, Interpol, to hunt down Iranian dissidents across the globe who Iran has classified as "terrorists" ....unlike Hezbollah and Hamas which Iran, of course, deems freedom fighters. But the most disturbing part of this article is the fact that it appears that the Iranians are even using Interpol to search for these dissidents here in America. The strategy is pretty simple - the Iranians are trying to cut down on international support for the Green Revolution inside of Iran and if you consider all of the ex-Iranians who live in America who have been calling for the fall of the mullah regime, our country is rich in targets for the Iranians.

Let's take a quick look again at just what Barack Hussein Obama did at the end of last year...under the cloak of night...in the darkness of the White House (from the Washington Examiner):


Obama gives Interpol free hand in U.S.

No presidential statement or White House press briefing was held on it. In fact, all that can be found about it on the official White House Web site is the Dec. 17 announcement and one-paragraph text of President Obama's Executive Order 12425, with this innocuous headline: "Amending Executive Order 12425 Designating Interpol as a public international organization entitled to enjoy certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities."In fact, this new directive from Obama may be the most destructive blow ever struck against American constitutional civil liberties. No wonder the White House said as little as possible about it.

First, Obama has granted Interpol the ability to operate within the territorial limits of the United States without being subject to the same constitutional restraints that apply to all domestic law enforcement agencies such as the FBI. Second, Obama has exempted Interpol's domestic facilities -- including its office within the U.S. Department of Justice -- from search and seizure by U.S. authorities and from disclosure of archived documents in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by U.S. citizens. Think very carefully about what you just read: Obama has given an international law enforcement organization that is accountable to no other national authority the ability to operate as it pleases within our own borders, and he has freed it from the most basic measure of official transparency and accountability, the FOIA.

Now, with that reminder of the travesty of Obama's midnight order, let's look at some of the latest situation regarding how the Iranians are using Interpol to do its dirty work:


The Iranian regime is notorious for cracking down on dissent inside Iran. Now Mahmoud Ahmadenijad and the mullahs are targeting dissidents in other countries -- including those in the United States.
And they are using an international organization to do it.

Shahram Homayoun fled Iran for the United States 19 years ago. He was a marked man in his native country, because of his support for democracy and human rights.

Now the regime has finally caught up with Homayoun: not in Tehran, but in Los Angeles.

"They have managed to keep me here, and it seems like there is nothing the U.S. government can do," Homayoun told CBN News in an exclusive interview.

Homayoun owns a satellite television network in L.A. called Channel One TV. He broadcasts pro-democracy programming into Iran on a daily basis.

Now Iranian officials want to silence him -- permanently. A prosecutor in the Iranian city of Shiraz recently issued an arrest warrant against Homayoun on charges of terrorism.

This is just one example of what is going on. So, I ask the question - are you comfortable with an American citizen or someone residing in America being subject to international censorship, harassment and even arrest INSIDE of our borders? Okay, another question - is it just coincidence that shortly after the revolution in Iran occurred, in which Barack Hussein Obama did NOTHING to support the revolutionaries, that our President decided to give this free pass to Interpol inside of American borders?

At a time when Iran represents probably the biggest single organized threat to America, our President of 16 months not only hasn't done anything militarily to stop them but he has also done little with his threat of "sanctions." At the same time, the Iranians are enjoying a new long reach into America to put the clamps on those here who wish to shed the light on the evils of the Iranian regime. Which leads me to another question of you. If the Iranians can declare Iranian-Americans in the U.S. as terrorists and have Interpol arrest them in the U.S., can Iran not declare ANY American the same kind of terrorist and use this new found legal tool here?

I have said it before. Not only has Barack Hussein Obama done NOTHING to stop the Iranian regime's progress toward nuclear weaponry and their planned assault on Israel and the World, Obama has worked with them. Is this not aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States of America? Isn't there a remedy against Presidents who would go down this path?



Iran Targeting Dissidents Through Global Police


The Iranian regime is notorious for cracking down on dissent inside Iran. Now Mahmoud Ahmadenijad and the mullahs are targeting dissidents in other countries -- including those in the United States.

And they are using an international organization to do it.

The Regime Never Forgets

Shahram Homayoun fled Iran for the United States 19 years ago. He was a marked man in his native country, because of his support for democracy and human rights.

Now the regime has finally caught up with Homayoun: not in Tehran, but in Los Angeles.

"They have managed to keep me here, and it seems like there is nothing the U.S. government can do," Homayoun told CBN News in an exclusive interview.

Homayoun owns a satellite television network in L.A. called Channel One TV. He broadcasts pro-democracy programming into Iran on a daily basis.

Now Iranian officials want to silence him -- permanently. A prosecutor in the Iranian city of Shiraz recently issued an arrest warrant against Homayoun on charges of terrorism.

Homayoun explained that he has never called for violence or terrorism of any kind against the Iranian government.

"Never," he said. "Even if the Iranian regime changes, we are encouraging people not to seek revenge. We are anti-terrorism."

Yet Homayoun is now a wanted man, unable to leave the U.S. for fear of arrest.

Marked as a Terrorist

The Iranian regime alerted INTERPOL, the global law enforcement organization, about Homayoun. The organization then issued what's known as a "Red Notice" against him. The Red Notice alerted all 188 INTERPOL member countries that Homayoun was wanted for terrorism.

Homayoun told CBN News that the terrorist charge has made his life extremely difficult.

"I received a notice from my bank in California letting me know about the INTERPOL arrest warrant," he explained. "After a few days, they closed my account. This was after 10 years that I had an account with this bank. I wanted to open an account at another local bank, and they turned me down as well because I was on the INTERPOL list of terrorists. My wife was also turned down when she tried to open an account."

Homayoun said he can't believe the irony of it all. He spends his days on TV speaking out against terrorism committed by the Iranian regime, which funds groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. Now that very regime is accusing him of acts of terror in order to silence him -- and INTERPOL seems to be playing right along.

"You have a terrorist regime in Iran -- they whack their own dissidents inside the country. They've murdered over 200 opposition people outside the country. And now they're using the international police organization to go after those same dissidents," Iran expert Ken Timmerman said.

Timmerman told CBN News that INTERPOL should have thrown out the Iranian warrant against Homayoun immediately.

"INTERPOL should not be taking the word of the Iranian regime, a terrorist organization, to the bank," he said. "They should not be, without any kind of critical examination, accepting arrest warrants from the Iranian regime against people that they can easily verify their activities have nothing to do with terrorism, like Sharham Homayoun."

Organization Partially Funded by U.S. Tax Dollars

INTERPOL helps facilitate cooperation and information sharing among law enforcement agencies across the world. It is funded in part by U.S. taxpayer dollars and is headquartered in Lyon, France.

The group's representatives told CBN News that INTERPOL does not get involved in political matters. They would not comment on the Iranian charges against Homayoun, which appear politically motivated.

"They have no police authority here in the U.S.," said Timothy Williams, the director of INTERPOL's U.S. branch in Washington, D.C. "They can't come here and make arrests. They don't have any authorities here in the U.S. There's not INTERPOL agents running around the world making arrests."

Williams said his office works closely with INTERPOL headquarters in France, but ultimately answers to the U.S. attorney general and the president of the United States.

"If there is a terrorism lead, we may send it to the FBI here who will work that lead," he said. "If its narcotics, we may send it to the DEA or a state or local agency. That's how it works here in the U.S."

Obama's Controversial Executive Order

But critics fear a recent move by the Obama administration could give INTERPOL free reign inside America and lead to the targeting of more U.S. residents like Homayoun.

President Obama issued a controversial executive order late last year that grants INTERPOL the ability to operate on U.S. soil without the usual restraints that apply to domestic law enforcement agencies, like the FBI.

That means the international organization is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Its staff and offices at the Department of Justice cannot be searched, and its files cannot be seized.

"All that did was give them the same authorities and immunities that any international organization that's based here in the U.S. has, nothing more, nothing less," Williams said.

INTERPOL Red Notice Remains

Homayoun believes the Iranian regime is manipulating INTERPOL to target its enemies in America and Europe.

"Isn't this an insult to the justice system, the legal system in the United States?" he asked. "Iran has been empowered here in the United States by INTERPOL."

Homayoun plans to challenge the INTERPOL Red Notice through legal means. He said the FBI has reassured him that he will be safe on U.S. soil.

For now, though, he remains on the organization's international list as a wanted terrorist.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

An Interview With One of the Opposition Leaders In Iran


This interview can be found over at the Telegraph and is an excellent look into what the Green Movement opposition really thinks about what is going on inside of Iran and if indeed, there is any chance of the current regime being ousted.



Mehdi Karroubi's question and answer session


The Sunday Telegraph: Last month somebody fired a gun at you and last week you were assaulted. Are you still in danger?

Mehdi Karroubi: Yes. I'm 73 years old. As a cleric and a close friend of the late Ayatollah Khomeini, I have a legal, national and religious duty to do something for our people.

When I was 25 years old I participated in the revolution alongside Ayatollah Khomeini. Since that time until now I have done what was needed no matter the danger or the price I had to pay.

ST: After the security forces stifled your protests last week, what will be the opposition's new strategy?

MK: At the moment there is no official rally we are asking the people to attend. We will ask, in accordance with article 27 of constitution, to have a peaceful demonstration, in order to show the people's support for our movement.

If they don't let us have that, we will have to try different methods to talk and educate the people about the peace movement and extend it to the whole country.

We want to maintain our peaceful demands in accordance with the constitution. But we don't want the people to pay the high price.

Presently the state shows less tolerance and tries to use violence against the people. Many young people are in prison and have received unacceptable sentences. There is no way to back away from the people's rights. But we have to find a proper way to ask the people's rights and put the revolution back on track, without letting them divert the Islamic republic from its main goals with great cost to the people.

And we will talk to the people about our programme in the near future. Mr Mousavi and I will have a meeting in the near future and will let the people know about our strategy and work. The meeting might be sometime this week.

Our priorities are the release of the many prisoners without any condition and free elections without monitoring by the Guardian Council [an unelected body that can veto candidates]. The last thing is the creation of a good atmosphere for a free press recognition of the right to criticise. The current atmosphere, dominated by fear and police control must be removed and we must create a situation where all the people come together and present their ideas about the future of the state. It is the people's right to choose. In the view of Khomeini, the most important thing was the vote of the people.

ST: When did you last meet the supreme leader and what did you discuss with him?

MK: The last meeting with the leader was before the June election. We discussed the government's internal problems and foreign policy. Also I criticised president Ahmadinejad's foreign policy and its effect on our national security and our national interests. I also asked about his ideas about the elections and he said: "there is no difference for me between the candidates."

ST: Do you believe that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the legitimate president of Iran?

MK: There's a difference between legitimacy and reality. In reality he's head of executive power. But in my opinion, legitimate governments must be appointed by the people in fair and widely supported elections. Our constitution also emphasises this point. We recognise him as the head of the government, which controls everything from the budget to municipal and foreign policy. He must provide the proper response in regard to duty.

But our problem with his legitimacy remains. If we want to have a peaceful demonstration, we have to ask permission of the government. We recognise them only as the dominant power, not as the legitimate government.

ST: Have you and the other opposition leader, Mir Hossein Mousavi, discussed the possibility of a negotiated settlement with Mr Ahmadinejad?

MK: At the moment we are working on the issue. But the lack of respect and recognition of the people's rights has created many problems inside Iran. We haven't appointed anybody for negotiation with Mr Ahmadinejad, but the most important thing is respect and understanding of the people's needs and rights.

ST: Why have elements of the security forces attacked peaceful protesters?

MK: The political life of some people, including some military men, depends on crisis. They deny the people's rights and try to dominate all Iranian spheres - economic as well as political. They even try to deny our rights under our constitution. In this situation, they try to create crisis and leave the country in crisis. For this reason they don't want the people to follow their rights in a peaceful manner and a peaceful atmosphere.

ST: Do you have any news of the senior reformist politicians who are still in prison?

MK: Many reformist politicians and former members of parliament are still in prison. We hope they will soon be free. Many reformist politicians prefer to be silent because if they're talking they have to go to jail.

ST: You have said that senior clerics are worried about the situation. What will they do about it?

MK: It's true the senior clergy worry about the situation. They worry about the state and future of the Islamic republic of Iran. Iran is now an Islamic state, based on both republican and Islamic ideals. They don't want any damage to the people's belief in Islam. For us, and the senior clergy in Qom, if there is damage to the Islamic state, it is direct damage to Islam. The late Ayatollah Khomeini said that if we receive damage to the state, it's a direct damage to people's view of Islam.

The people in Qom are worried about the future of the state, its stability and also about the spiritual health of Islam among the young generation. There is no contradiction between Islam and human rights in view of many scholars. But in view of the state's behaviour, many people have now started to think there is, and that it is not possible to have both under Islamic laws.