Hand Book of the ICNA (Islamic Circle of North America) Reveals How the Group Has Lied To Americans, World Rule by Islam IS the Goal

You know, we have more four letter acronym islamic organizations in America than you can shake a stick at and I have a suggestion for the American public in trying to sift through them....THEY'RE ALL BAD.

The Islamic Circle of North America is one of those organizations that has been tasked with propagandizing islam for the sheep here in America and in Canada - their job is simple - present islam as just a harmless religion whose followers just want to be accepted and they won't cause any problems and in fact, more people should check islam out...it's really a fun and peaceful religion.

Well, the organization's handbook has been put under the microscope in this article at Family Security Matters and the contents are chilling (but not surprising):

The Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) is preaching a global Caliphate and Islamic Shari'a law over America to its members, according to the 2010 ICNA Member's Hand Book. This is a very different message than the group's public outreach efforts, and contradicts claims that the organization is a tolerant, mainstream Islamic group.

As the hand book spells out, the organization's ultimate goal is "the Establishment of Islam" as the sole basis of global society and governance. It also encourages members to deceive people in its proselytizing campaign to help fulfill this goal. This aim is one that ICNA has been actively pursuing as the group has set its sights on America's constitutional separation of religion and state.

"Establishment of the Religion" extends beyond the individual and family and into the society, state, and world. "These words [Establishment of the Religion] include not only practicing the religion in individual and collective life and propagating its true teaching to others, but also striving to make this Deen [religion] a way of life for all," the hand book reads.

ICNA's charter is even more explicit. It calls for the "establishment of the Islamic system of life" in the world, "whether it pertains to beliefs, rituals and morals or to economic, social or political spheres."

And now, here's one of the money lines from the hand book:

"The adoption and adaptation of capitalist, socialist, communist or other manmade systems, either in whole or in part, constitutes a denial of Islam and disbelief in Allah the Lord of the worlds."

So, let's look at that - adopting capitalism constitutes a denial of Islam and disbelief in allah so tell me how ANY muslim, who agrees with the ICNA, is going to assimilate into America? This is the kind of language that is under the surface....these clowns will show up on television and radio and tell you that they want America to be their home, that they love this country but their very hand book states that they cannot accept one of the mainstays of life in America.

These people are liars, America. It's time we shed those rose colored glasses and naively welcoming open arms and put on our pair of cynical night vision goggles - too many people in this world welcomed in these charlatans and before they knew it...they were dhimmified.

Hand Book Shows Islamic Circle of North America's True Goals


The Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) is preaching a global Caliphate and Islamic Shari'a law over America to its members, according to the 2010 ICNA Member's Hand Book. This is a very different message than the group's public outreach efforts, and contradicts claims that the organization is a tolerant, mainstream Islamic group.

As the hand book spells out, the organization's ultimate goal is "the Establishment of Islam" as the sole basis of global society and governance. It also encourages members to deceive people in its proselytizing campaign to help fulfill this goal. This aim is one that ICNA has been actively pursuing as the group has set its sights on America's constitutional separation of religion and state.

It's not the first example of radicalism by one of America's largest Muslim organizations. ICNA's magazine has featured interviews with terrorist leaders in Pakistan, called on youth to fight abroad in Kashmir, and honored like-minded extremist organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and South Asia's Jamaat-e-Islami. Concerns have also been expressed about 5 young members of the group's Virginia mosque, who were arrested and convicted on terrorism charges after attempting to link up with and fight for Pakistani terror groups in December 2009.

As the hand book explains, ICNA doesn't just believe that religion is a private affair.

"Establishment of the Religion" extends beyond the individual and family and into the society, state, and world. "These words [Establishment of the Religion] include not only practicing the religion in individual and collective life and propagating its true teaching to others, but also striving to make this Deen [religion] a way of life for all," the hand book reads.

ICNA's charter is even more explicit. It calls for the "establishment of the Islamic system of life" in the world, "whether it pertains to beliefs, rituals and morals or to economic, social or political spheres."

For ICNA, this means being the American branch of a global phenomenon that they refer to as the 'Islamic Movement.' The 2010 Hand Book notes, branches of this movement "are active in various parts of the world to achieve the same objectives. It is our obligation as Muslims to engage in the same noble cause here in North America."

Working in an 'Islamic Movement' culminates in an Islamic super-state, the Caliphate, the hand book says. Believers have an obligation to strive to reestablish a collective body of Muslims worldwide, organized into the super-state under the direction of a Caliphate and Islamic law. The group wants "the united Muslim Ummah [community] in a united Islamic state, governed by an elected khalifah in accordance with the laws of shari'ah."

While these ideas may have been popularized decades before by the Muslim Brotherhood and South Asian radicals in Jamaat-e-Islami, ICNA is emphasizing them today in its education and membership.

The group also realizes that achieving its aim is a slow process and involves several stages. In a section called, "Levels of work by the Islamic Movement," ICNA lists five stages to attain a global Caliphate. The group advocates spreading its view of Islam to Muslims and non-Muslims alike, starting with the individual and family, and then implementing the "Establishment of the Religion" in the society, state, and global level.

In the early stages, members pass through the "Tarbiyah Process," an education consisting of radical literature promoting Islam in place of Western systems at later stages in the Islamic Movement. For example, the group advocates that members read Fathi Yakin's To Be A Muslim, a book which declares that

"true commitment requires every Muslim to dedicate his or her life in a jihad to establish and maintain a system of Islamic governance."

Likewise, the book pits Muslims against non-Muslims, by declaring all non-Islamic political and social systems to be contrary to Islam. As Yakin declares,

"The adoption and adaptation of capitalist, socialist, communist or other manmade systems, either in whole or in part, constitutes a denial of Islam and disbelief in Allah the Lord of the worlds."

At the "Societal Level," ICNA advocates Islamist solutions to society's problems while providing social services and proselytizing to non-Muslims. Often, this is done in a deceptive way, such as through the organization's WhyIslam branch. On one hand, the hand book openly states that "WhyIslam is a subdivision of the Dawah [proselytizing] Department" that "works to promote Islam among non-Muslims." However, the document instructs ICNA members to state a different mission by WhyIslam to non-Muslims, one that wants to "build a bridge of understanding between Muslims and Non-Muslims" and "to educate the American public with accurate information of Islam."

In the next stage, called the "State Level," Islam gains traction in a larger segment of society" and "a good part of the society's thinking individuals join the movement. Then it may move to establish an Islamic society, obedient to Allah's commands."

The struggle then reaches the "Global Level" with worldwide ambitions. "Wherever the Islamic movement succeeds to establish true Islamic society, they will form coalitions and alliances. This will lead to the unity of the Ummah [Muslim nation] and towards the establishment of a Khilafah [Caliphate]," the book says in the section, "Levels of work by the Islamic Movement."

While this may seem like a farfetched concept of world domination, it is actually the same philosophy embodied by the group that ICNA admits founded it. Jamaat-e-Islami [JI], a radical South Asian group committed to the same purposes of a regional and then global Caliphate, promotes an identical message of Islamist domination of society, government, economics, and culture. ICNA maintains its connection to the group with a senior member of the JI from India, Yusuf Islahi, teaching in the organization's headquarters. Likewise, the 2010 hand book and other membership reading lists repeatedly emphasize the radical literature of JI's founder, Sayyid Abul 'Ala Maududi.

Maududi's books, like Let Us Be Muslims, are regular features in the group's education about replacing secular governments with Islamic ones. "Briefly speaking, it would be enough to state that the real objective of Islam is to remove the lordship of man over man and to establish the kingdom of God on Earth," declares Maududi in Let Us Be Muslims. He goes on to promote destroying non-Islamic governments, stating,

"the duty devolves on you that wherever you are, in whichever country you live, you must … snatch away the power of legislation and lordship from those who do not fear God and are unbridled. And then taking over the leadership and superintendence of God's servants, conduct the affairs of the government in accordance with God's laws."

In Witness Unto Mankind, another book on ICNA's reading list, Maududi discusses how Islam will bring about the destruction of Western political and social systems. With the rise of Islamic political power, "secularism will lose all credibility and authority. Their philosophy and world-view, their economic and political ideologies, will prove fake and spurious when confronted by your truth and right conduct," he states.

"The forces that today belong to the secular camp will, one by one, break away and join the camp of Islam. A time will, then, come when communism will live in fear of its very survival in Moscow itself, when capitalist democracy will shudder at the thought of defending itself even in Washington and New York, when materialist secularism will be unable to find a place even in the universities of London and Paris, when racialism and nationalism will not win even one devotee even among the Brahmans and Germans."

This militancy has led countries like Bangladesh to ban all of Maududi's books and arrest leading JI members. Pakistan has followed suit, arresting other JI leaders in anti-militancy operations. India has also banned the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), the former student branch of JI in that country, for its connection to al-Qaida and domestic terrorist operations.

ICNA's message in 2010 reinforces its long-held belief in spreading Islamist ideals, which it believes will culminate in a Caliphate. While its benevolent face preaches social justice and charity work, the goals it espouses to members tell a very different story.

Oklahoma Judge Sides With Muslims and CAIR, Blocks Oklahoma Sharia Law Banning

Absolute heartache here today, folks as an Oklahoma judge has come out on the side of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and has told the people of Oklahoma to get screwed. The amendment to the Oklahoma state constitution that restricts the use of international law and Sharia Law, which passed with over 70% of the vote of Oklahomans, is now blocked from taking effect because of the ruling of one Judge Vicky Miles-Lagrange.

I have excerpts below from the BBC and also from Logans Warning:

A US federal judge has stopped Oklahoma putting into effect a constitutional amendment to bar courts from considering Islamic law in judgements.

Judge Vicky Miles-Lagrange granted an injunction against the certification of the results of State Question 755.

In her ruling on Monday, Judge Miles-Lagrange said Mr Awad had shown he would have suffered an "injury, specifically, an invasion of his First Amendment rights" if the results of Question 755 were certified.

"Plaintiff has sufficiently set forth a personal stake in this action by alleging that he lives in Oklahoma, is a Muslim, that the amendment conveys an official government message of disapproval and hostility toward his religious beliefs, that sends a clear message he is an outsider, not a full member of the political community, thereby chilling his access to the government and forcing him to curtail his political and religious activities," she explained.

More specifically, this is what the judge had to say further:

“This order addresses issues that go to the very foundation of our country, our (U.S.) Constitution, and particularly, the Bill of Rights. Throughout the course of our country’s history, the will of the ‘majority’ has on occasion conflicted with the constitutional rights of individuals, an occurrence which our founders foresaw and provided for through the Bill of Rights…

“Having carefully reviewed the briefs on this issue, and having heard the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing, the Court finds plaintiff has made a strong showing of a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his claim asserting a violation of the Free Exercise Clause.

“As set forth above, plaintiff has shown that the actual language of the amendment reasonably, and perhaps more reasonably, may be viewed as specifically singling out Sharia Law (plaintiff’s faith) and, thus, is not facially neutral.

“Additionally, as set forth above, the Court finds that plaintiff has shown that there is a reasonable probability that the amendment would prevent plaintiff’s will from being fully probated by a state court in Oklahoma because it incorporates by reference specific elements of the Islamic prophetic traditions.

Okay, I'm trying to calm down here and I must say, when this judge said a couple of weeks ago that she needed more time, I had a bad feeling about this. But I have a ton of beefs with this decision but let me pick one....the one argument she makes" that because it incorporates by reference specific elements of the Islamic prophetic traditions."

Well, first of all, calling Sharia Law a "tradition" is complete and utter madness and a sign that this judge is completely clueless about Islam. And what is obvious from this ruling is that a muslim in Oklahoma has a RIGHT to a Sharia court that would supercede the current courts in Oklahoma - how can you not read that into this ruling?

Now, let's look at what the plaintiff in this case, the head of CAIR in Oklahoma had to say after the ruling:

Mr Awad said: "We applaud today's ruling and welcome the opportunity it offers to demonstrate that Oklahoma's Muslim community simply seeks to enjoy the civil and religious rights guaranteed to all Americans."

So there you have it - the weapon that the islamists will continually use against us here in America to gain the upper hand in this country - the U.S. Constitution. Think about that statement by Mr. Awad - he argued that the civil rights of American muslims would be violated by this state amendment...yet he didn't point out in his argument that Sharia Law strips every muslim woman of her civil rights according to the definition by the Constitution. You see, Sharia Law and the Constitution are completely incompatible but the islamists are using the very document they seek to override to establish their right to override it.

So what can we do? Well I am not a Constitutional scholar by any means but it seems to me that we have to move forward quickly with legal action that Islam is not a religion. You saw in the judge's ruling where she stated:

plaintiff has presented evidence that there is a reasonable probability that Muslims, including plaintiff, will be unable to bring actions in Oklahoma state courts for violations of the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act and for violations of their rights under the United States Constitution if those violations are based upon their religion.

And so that is the kicker - as long as Islam is viewed as a religion, it will receive this type of protection. When will someone have the balls and the fortitude to bring Islam to court? When will someone finally make the case in court that just because you call your political ideology a religion, it doesn't protect you under the Constitution?

What we saw yesterday was another terror attack on the United States of America - this one, however, left no dead bodies, no buildings in ruins....no, this was a terror attack by the Soft Jihad....and believe me, it was more effective than more than a dozen 9/11 attacks.

Oklahoma Judge Sides With CAIR and Blocks Sharia ban!


In this disappointing but not surprising update to the elected Sharia ban in Oklahoma Courts, we see that Judge Miles-LaGrange has gone against the will of the people. As she has blocked the certification of the Sharia ban. This is a preliminary injunction, until a final decision is made on the lawsuit. But for now, she just handed Islam a victory.

Here is what the judge had to say.

“This order addresses issues that go to the very foundation of our country, our (U.S.) Constitution, and particularly, the Bill of Rights. Throughout the course of our country’s history, the will of the ‘majority’ has on occasion conflicted with the constitutional rights of individuals, an occurrence which our founders foresaw and provided for through the Bill of Rights…

“Having carefully reviewed the briefs on this issue, and having heard the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing, the Court finds plaintiff has made a strong showing of a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his claim asserting a violation of the Free Exercise Clause.

“As set forth above, plaintiff has shown that the actual language of the amendment reasonably, and perhaps more reasonably, may be viewed as specifically singling out Sharia Law (plaintiff’s faith) and, thus, is not facially neutral.

“Additionally, as set forth above, the Court finds that plaintiff has shown that there is a reasonable probability that the amendment would prevent plaintiff’s will from being fully probated by a state court in Oklahoma because it incorporates by reference specific elements of the Islamic prophetic traditions.

“Further, plaintiff has presented evidence that there is a reasonable probability that Muslims, including plaintiff, will be unable to bring actions in Oklahoma state courts for violations of the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act and for violations of their rights under the United States Constitution if those violations are based upon their religion.

“Finally, the Court finds that defendants have presented no evidence which would show that the amendment is justified by any compelling interest or is narrowly tailored.”

This is a perfect example of how Muslims use our freedoms against us, and this also shows us that the US Constitution will not protect us from Islam. Unfortunately it actually enables it.

Of course the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), was thrilled.

“We applaud today’s ruling and welcome the opportunity it offers to demonstrate that Oklahoma’s Muslim community simply seeks to enjoy the civil and religious rights guaranteed to all Americans by our Constitution,” said Awad.

As I have been saying, our laws are not cut out to fight the internal threat of Islam, and if there are not some major changes in them, we will eventually lose this war.

Brits Standing Up To Radicalization of British Mosques Win Libel Case Brought Against Them

A bit of a pig's fly moment in Britain as a British court has totally dismissed an appeal for a British think tank group to be held libel for charges they made against British mosques - a charge that those mosques are distributing highly radical and violent messages about jihad.

We have seen all too often that the courts have sided with the islamic nut jobs in protection of their so-called "religion" so it is rather refreshing to see a court tell the islamists to shove it. But this ruling won't stop the constant onslaught of legal actions that the muslims of Europe and America will continue to clog our courts with - it's the message that islam deserves a free pass from any accountability in our society that they must continue to hammer home.

I didn't see any fatwas ordered against the judge in this case...but hey, it's early.

Here's the article from Family Security Matters.

UK Think Tank Wins Libel Action Brought By British Mosque


A UK think-tank has an announcement that it has defeated a libel action brought against it by a London mosque over the publication of its report “The Hijacking of British Islam.”

According to the announcement by the Policy Exchange:

Policy Exchange is pleased to report that the libel action brought by the North London Central Mosque (NLCM) against it over its report The Hijacking of British Islam has now ended, following the dismissal of NLCM’s appeal against the order of Mr Justice Eady.

NLCM has paid a substantial contribution towards Policy Exchange’s costs.

A statement agreed between the parties appears on our website here. Policy Exchange has not apologised to NLCM for the publication of its report.

In September 2008, the North London Central Mosque sought to sue Policy Exchange for libel over claims made in its report The Hijacking of British Islam. Policy Exchange denied that the claims were libelous.

On 26 November 2009, Mr Justice Eady struck out NLCM’s claim on the grounds that the NLCM lacked the capacity to sue in respect of the report.

NLCM sought the Court’s permission to appeal. This was twice refused. It was granted by Lord Justice Sedley on 21 April 2010 on the third time of asking. Lord Justice Sedley nevertheless emphasised that he did not believe there was a realistic prospect of NLCM overturning Mr Justice Eady’s ruling.

In the meantime, in February 2010 the trustees of the mosque abandoned their individual claims in libel against Policy Exchange in respect of the same report and paid a substantial contribution to Policy Exchange’s legal costs.

In October 2010 NLCM discontinued its appeal and paid a substantial contribution to Policy Exchange’s legal costs. Following that agreement the appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 5 October 2010. Policy Exchange agreed to publish the statement which appears here.

Policy Exchange has not apologised to either the mosque or the trustees for the publication of the report.

The case is now closed.

A spokesman for Policy Exchange said: ‘We are delighted that this case has now been brought to a satisfactory conclusion.’

The Policy Exchange investigation found that radical material, much of it from Saudi Arabia, was available in 25% of the mosques visited including some of the most important mosques in the U.K. According to the report summary:

On the one hand, the results were reassuring: in only a minority of institutions – approximately 25% – was radical material found. What is more worrying is that these are among the best-funded and most dynamic institutions in Muslim Britain – some of which are held up as mainstream bodies. Many of the institutions featured here have been endowed with official recognition. This has come in the form of, official visits from politicians and even members of the Royal Family; provision of funding; ‘partnership’ associations; or some other seal of approval.

Within the literature identified here, a number of key themes emerge – many of which focus around the twin concepts of ‘loyalty’ and ‘enmity’. Simply put, these notions demand that the individual Muslim must not merely feel deep affection for and identity with, his fellow believers and with all that is authentically Islamic. The individual Muslim must also feel an abhorrence for non-believers, hypocrites, heretics, and all that is deemed ‘un-Islamic’. The latter category encompasses those Muslims who are judged to practise an insufficiently rigorous form of Islam. Much of the material is thus infused with a strident sectarianism, in which many Muslims – particularly the very large number of Sufis in this country and around the world – are placed beyond the pale.

More widely, Muslims are urged to separate themselves from people and things that are not considered Islamic; a separation that is to be mental, emotional, and at times, even physical. Western society, in particular, is held to be sinful, corrosive and corrupting for Muslims. Western values – particularly concerning the position and rights of women and in the realm of sexuality generally – are rejected as inimical to Islam.

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), an umbrella organization heavily dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, responded to the report by stating:

The Hijacking of British Islam’ plumbs new depths in the ongoing and transparent attempts to try and delegitimise popular mainstream Islamic institutions in the UK and replace them with those who are subservient to neo-conservative aims. The report cultivates an insidious programme of generating sectarianism amongst British Muslims by preferring some traditions of Islam over others.

Many of the mosques identified in the Policy Exchange report are members of the MCB.

Note: A video exchange between a Policy Exchange official and head of the MCB can be seen here.

The British Muslim Initiative (BMI), a U.K. Muslim Brotherhood organization claimed that the report itself was “wildly fabricated.”and called on the Conservative Party to “reconsider their close relationship with Policy Exchange.”

America, They Are Setting You Up for Submission To Islam

Okay, as you all know I've been trying recently to step up the warnings to the American people that we are under assault in this country by the islamists - the soft jihad has never been at a more fevered pitch and as we all know, the proposed Ground Zero mosque has highlighted just how complicit our Federal government has been in the efforts to continually give islam a foot up in their positioning of this fake religion in America.

I want each of you that truly believes that the islamification of America is a real threat, that we are heading for full-fledged dhimmitude, to go to this site here and read the entire executive summary of this organization, the U.S-Muslim Engagement Initiative. I won't excerpt it all below due to the lengthy of it but you should make it a point to read it all. This is a collaboration going on in America, right under our noses that seeks to integrate the violent political ideology into America and the world. These insidious people are beyond appeasers and proponents of violent jihad and islamofascism - these are people at work, RIGHT NOW, behind the scenes who are intent on forcing you onto a prayer mat five times a day.

Look at this from the executive summary:

Creating partnerships for peace with Muslim countries and communities is one of the greatest challenges—and opportunities—facing the United States today. Currently, conflict, misunderstanding, and distrust plague U.S. relations with Muslims in many countries, imperiling security for all. Maintaining the status quo raises the specter of prolonged confrontation, catastrophic attacks, and a cycle of retaliation.

Despite these tensions, the vast majority of Americans and Muslims around the world want peace, amicable relations, good governance, prosperity, and respect. Policies and actions—not a clash of civilizations—are at the root of our divisions.

See? It didn't take them more than one paragraph of their report to minimize the 14,000 + islamic terror attacks across the world since 2001 - it starts out immediately promoting the charade that muslims around the world want peace. Can anyone out there give me three examples of any muslims in America or in the world that have actually proposed any kind of peace? Can anyone out there give me examples of ANY muslim leaders in this world that regularly condemn the atrocities of jihad?

So, let's look at what this organization's overall strategy is:

The central message of our strategy is that the U.S. government, business, faith, education, and media leaders must work with Muslim counterparts to build a coalition that will turn the tide against extremism. Our recommendations are directed primarily to U.S. leaders and institutions, but we can succeed only if counterparts in Muslim majority countries and communities also take responsibility for addressing key challenges: reducing extremism, resolving political and sectarian conflicts, holding governments accountable, creating more vibrant economies, correcting misconceptions, and engaging in dialogue to build mutual respect and understanding.

Notice that part that says "are directed primarily to U.S. leaders and institutions" ? In other words, it's America that has to change our thinking to solve the muslim problems in the world. And I ask you, as you read this summary...could this not have been written by the Obama administration? Or was it written TO the Obama administration?

Let's look at one more paragraph:

Only a tiny minority of Muslims is involved in violence against the U.S. and its allies. The extremists’ ability to recruit, operate, and inflict harm depends on a more widespread set of active and passive supporters. In many Muslim majority countries and Muslim minority communities, that support is driven by deep-seated frustration with poor governance, constraints on political activity, and lack of economic opportunity.

There it is, people...the money quote. This is the infamous "moderate" muslim argument and the worn out excuse for islamic terror as frustration by a few with their economic conditions in their countries. This is complete insanity. In this entire executive summary, there isn't one reference to the Qur'an's call for jihad. There isn't one reference to islam's demand for sharia law. Oh no, they simply try to rationalize islamic terror as actually something that is the fault of us...of the West. In other words, since Haji can't find a job in Pakistan, he decides to train as a jihadi for two years, then travels to the U.S. to set off a car bomb in a busy American city ...all because he couldn't land that job at the photo mart in Karachi - it's that simple, right?

These are dangerous people, America. When you are at that site, go to the tab for "Endorsements" and be prepared to be shocked at the leaders in America that have bought into this plan for our destruction. Write down the names of the wolves in sheep's clothing.

We are slowly but surely uncovering the diabolical schemes going on in America right now that seek to set America up for conquest - look at the situation in Europe and understand that this is the mission of groups like this...if you think Juan Williams' firing was an outrage, you ain't seen nothing yet. If these people get their way, Juan Williams would be facing a jail sentence for what he said, perhaps worse.

NOTE: I'd like to thank Gary at The Victory Institute for steering me to this site and to this organization.

Muslim-American Soldier at Fort Hood: Army Training Is "Propaganda Against Islam"

I saw this story and almost didn't believe this could actually come out of the mouth of a soldier AT FORT HOOD after what we saw with the Ft. Hood Massacre but at the same time, we continue to see muslims in America push the envelope - we see the limits of islamophobia propaganda pushed and pushed. This has become a war on our shores - American tolerance vs. The Soft Jihad.

From the article at CNSNews:

Zachari Klawonn, a Muslim U.S. Army specialist stationed at Fort Hood, Texas, told the Arabic-language television network Al Jazeera in a recent interview that training he had undergone in the U.S. military was “propaganda against Islam.”

Fort Hood is the Army installation where Maj. Nidal Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, executed a terrorist attack last November. Hasan has since been charged with murdering 13 people and attempting to murder 32 others. Al Jazeera is based in Qatar.

U.S. Army Specialist Klawonn told Al Jazeera he was subject to disrespectful comments and harassment of his property from fellow soldiers and from the Army command itself.

Imagine, a muslim soldier at Fort Hood feeling a little uncomfortable after one of his jihadi brothers killed 9 soldiers in cold blood...boy, that's just so hard to believe, isn't it?

We have to remember something - a muslim's allegiance is always going to be to allah, not country. And what we also see in this story is the fact that Al Jazeera is quick to start spreading an aggressive campaign against the U.S. military in regards to muslim soldiers - this is all part of the Soft Jihad in that it will put the Army's top brass on the defensive. You wait, you will see some of these tactics leading to more "sensitivity" training for U.S. soldiers regarding muslims in their midst.

We have already seen in America how businesses have been cornered into altering their corporate rules and guidelines to accommodate muslims. We have seen our colleges and universities bend over backwards not to offend muslims. And we have seen our politicians act to protect muslims at the same time they actively work to restrict the rights of Christians and Jews.

Believe me, the Soft Jihad is working. Working better than even the designers of it imagined.

(Hat Tip: Ploome)

Muslim-American Soldier at Fort Hood Tells Al Jazeera: U.S. Army Training is ‘Propaganda Against Islam’


(CNSNews.com) - Zachari Klawonn, a Muslim U.S. Army specialist stationed at Fort Hood, Texas, told the Arabic-language television network Al Jazeera in a recent interview that training he had undergone in the U.S. military was “propaganda against Islam.”

Fort Hood is the Army installation where Maj. Nidal Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, executed a terrorist attack last November. Hasan has since been charged with murdering 13 people and attempting to murder 32 others. Al Jazeera is based in Qatar.

U.S. Army Specialist Klawonn told Al Jazeera he was subject to disrespectful comments and harassment of his property from fellow soldiers and from the Army command itself.

A spokesman for Fort Hood told CNSNews.com that, as an American, Klawonn had a right to express his views and that he had informed his commanding officer that he was going to appear on Al-Jazeera. The spokesman said the Army did not agree with what Klawonn said.

When Klawoon appeared on Al Jazeera on Aug. 24, the moderator asked, "Could you tell us how this anti-Islam campaign which coincides with the month of Ramadan affected your situation at the Fort Hood base which witnessed a shooting by a former Muslim American soldier? How are you being treated these days?"

“Absolutely," said Klawonn. "Even before that horrific attack [by Maj. Hasan], the overwhelming sense of Islamophobia was present in the U.S. military. It’s evident within the anti-terrorism training as well as the vibe in the general environment around me, and unfortunately some of the discrimination I have been through is the result of that environment."

Islamic Stockholm Syndrome

Man, what a GREAT article this is from over at Family Security Matters! This is a must read for anyone that is concerned about islamic terror or islamofascism or anything in between.

I want to point out one piece of this article that I think really nails it:

Basic American values – what I call the three Cs – are going to have to come from the mothers and fathers of our children. The three Cs are: Country, Constitution, and Children. If we begin focusing on these values, we can defeat the Islamic Stockholm Syndrome.

What the author is saying is that we have to actively FIGHT I.S.S., not just make people aware of it - I've made many references at this blog about the "soft jihad" going on in America and that is one of the prime methods of mushrooming this Islamic Syndrome and I've stated that first, we need to shine the light of day on the Soft Jihad and then attack it. Let me just state one example.

You remember the case of the "Flying Imams" I'm sure. In order to fight the Soft Jihad, the imams who brought these lawsuits against ordinary American citizens should have been taken to court under charges of filing false charges - the imams should have been sued, they should have been hounded day in and day out for bringing their suits against concerned citizens. It isn't good enough that they lost their case because that's not what they wanted - they could care less about money, they wanted to ensure that Americans would learn from their actions and no American citizen would EVER dare risk making a false warning of terror activity. Well, what is needed is for everyone to become MORE sensitive to the behavior and not heistate one iota in reporting it.

The effects of Islamic Stockholm Syndrome will give the islamists their eventual prize - sharia law in America and subsequently, the takeover of our Country.

Exclusive: ISS (Islamic Stockholm Syndrome)


There have been many reactions from our book, Muslim Mafia. CAIR condemns it while American patriots are praising the book and the evidence we presented for all to see. It all boils down to this: The only people who should be offended in any manner by our book are terrorists and terror supporters. Islamic based terrorist groups and their supporters wittingly and unwittingly use the media, politicians, law enforcement, religious leaders, our educational system, and naïve Americans to further their agenda.

Many readers will recall Patricia Hearst. In 1974, she was taken hostage by bank robbers from the group known as the Symbionese Liberation Group (SLG). Hearst had always led a life of privilege and had literally nothing in common with her captors. She was held hostage for many months and later was taken prisoner herself by law enforcement because she had joind her captors and joined them in their career of robbing banks. Hearst was sentenced to two years but the sentence was later commuted by former President Jimmy Carter. Many educators and medical personnel came to her defense, and Hearst was subsequently diagnosed as having the effects of what was then labeled the “Stockholm Syndrome.” Essentially, Hearst began living the life and beliefs of her captors due to the fear they had initially imposed on her during her months as their hostage. In layman’s terms, she was “terrorized” by her captors and her very existence depended on them allowing her to live, for if they chose to do so, they could kill her at any time. She slept, ate, and conducted every waking hour watching her captors. Over a period of time she began to accept the notion that what her captors had done to her and others was right.

Now in 2010, we have millions of people who are suffering from what I describe as “Islamic Stockholm Syndrome.” Other people who study Islamism like Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, and Steve Emerson have discussed this concept, but I am giving it a name and hope my readers will begin sharing with others.

During my numerous presentations, lectures, training, and general discussions, I have often been asked how is it possible for very intelligent people (including journalists, law enforcement, politicians, and other Americans from all walks of life) to ignore the Islamic ideology of violence when we have had so many warning signs of the pending and planned violence by Islamic terror groups and their supporters. Hardly a day goes by that an Islamic leader does not express in vivid detail how Islam will annihilate not only Israel, but Canada, the UK, America and all parts of the world who are not part of the Islamic Ummah (Nation) under Sharia Law. We hear and see the violence being spread in the name of Islam, yet we remain silent. Not only do most remain silent, but many now clap for the very Islamic leaders who call for killing innocent people and ridicule and/or denounce their critics.

For 1,400 years, Islamic ideology has been passed down from one generation to the next and people have passed down the terrible atrocities committed in the name of Islam to their children and grandchildren. The world has witnessed the brutal beheadings, stoning, and outright murder of innocent men, women, and children by groups identifying themselves as “Pure Muslims.” The world has al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Taliban and numerous other groups killing innocent people daily. In America, we have the supporters of the same violent ideology threatening, harassing, intimidating, and daring anyone of organization to “oppress Islam.” To do so is to be labeled a hate monger, Islamophobe, racist, and many other nasty words invented by the leaders of Islamic based terrorist groups.

It is my belief that after the attack on our great country on 9/11, not only were millions of Americans traumatized, but millions of people across our globe as well. People in Canada, Australia, Japan, and many other countries looked at America as being the most powerful nation on earth – yet we had been attacked by a handful of “Saudi trained Islamic terrorists” and the great nation they saw as the “Giant” was crumbling to Islam as other nations had for centuries, with millions of people dying due to violence in the name of Islam.

This, I believe, was the beginning of “Islamic Stockholm Syndrome” (ISS). Of course, immediately after 9/11, our country had brave people openly saying we would fight to the death to save our beautiful country but in reality, this lasted only a few short months. Politicians have always been for the most part “gutless” and take the safe road, but in times past, when there was ample evidence to show them there is a particular problem with any given issue, they gave in to common sense and made the correct decisions. Those days are forever gone. Even when there is ample evidence provided by outstanding, intelligent men and women like Pamela Geller, Steve Emerson, Robert Spencer, and thousands of documents from the book Paul Sperry and I wrote (Muslim Mafia), clearly identifying Muslim Brotherhood (terrorist organizations) operating freely within our country whose intentions are to destroy our country and destroy the futures of our children, the evidence is being ignored. Our politicians are under the influence of ISS. Yes, many are still ignorant and incompetent, and have been in bed with the enemy for years – and now, law abiding politicians are accepting the violent Islamic ideology as a way of life.

ISS has affected the rational thinking of many of our senior law enforcement directors and managers. All across America there is ample evidence to indicate a strategic plan is being carried out to commit treason and sedition against our country. Islamic leaders have been providing lectures and documents to their worshippers for decades, detailing exactly how America can and will be destroyed from within. Many of our street level law enforcement see this happening on a daily basis, but they are powerless because their directors and managers are aligning themselves closer with their captors such as CAIR, ISNA, MSA, MAS, MANA (all Muslim Brotherhood Islamic non-profit organizations operating freely in America). Leaders within the FBI and major law enforcement departments, such as the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office (Sheriff Baca), open their doors to Islamic terrorist supporters yet throw up a hand to a concerned citizens reporting suspicious activity on such groups. Sedition and treason are being planned by Islamic leaders inside New York, yet we are allowing our “captors” (Islamic leaders financed by Saudi Arabia) to build a mosque on the sacred ground Islamic terrorists murdered over 3,000 innocent people that left thousands of young children to live their lives without their mothers or fathers.

Readers need to review the Stockholm Syndrome and do their part in understanding how it is possible for a hostage or victim of an Islamic terrorist group to have its very victims become supporters not just of their captors, but of their captors’ violent ideology.

Many readers will be asking what can be done. This is the most important question. In America and across the world we need to take back our children. Our children are not going to survive ISS by being taught by other ISS supporters. Basic American values – what I call the three Cs – are going to have to come from the mothers and fathers of our children. The three Cs are: Country, Constitution, and Children. If we begin focusing on these values, we can defeat the Islamic Stockholm Syndrome.

Do not allow your government, which is slowly adapting the ways of our captors (Islamic terrorist groups), to be in control of your children. Begin taking back your parental rights and insure that your children are taught the correct values, ethics, and morals upon which our country was founded. Do not allow the major media organizations to “brainwash” your children with values you know that are not designed in the best interest of your children or that of our nation. Do not send your children to the liberal universities that have already accepted their “captors’ demands” and their ideology.

Essentially, it is time for American to take back America. If it is not good enough for our children and our country, we do not want or need it. Oppress any “ism” that creeps along into our country and destroy it – or it will spread and your children will become its victims.

Coming Soon To Your Cable TV: The Islamic Superheroes Show!

Isn't it just terrific? Now, we Americans can all sit down after our evening meal, turn on the tube and watch superhero Islamists fight evil in the world! I know...I wish I WAS kidding.

I've never heard of this "The 99" before but apparently it's a comic book series and one of its biggest fans is Barack Hussein Obama. Enough said.

And some of you really thought I was kidding about the "soft jihad" in America, didn't you?

Here's the full story from The National.

Comic book goes up, up and away on US airwaves

A group of Islamic superheroes will move their battle against the baddies from comic books to a US cable network this year, its Kuwaiti creator says.

The 99, based on a group of ordinary people who discover superhuman powers and are influenced by messages from the Quran, will air a 26-episode series on the US cable channel The Hub, said Naif al Mutawa, the chairman and chief executive of Teshkeel Media.



“From day one it’s a for-profit company, but it’s a double bottom-line business,” Mr al Mutawa said. “It’s to benefit both the social bottom line as well as the financial.”

The 99 TV show is produced through a joint venture between Teshkeel and Endemol, the Dutch production company known for its series of reality television programs such as Big Brother and Deal or No Deal.

The Hub is a new cable network, a joint venture between Discovery Channel and the toy maker Hasbro, which will start broadcasting on October 10 into 60 million US homes. The 99 is one of six original programmes on the network.



Mr al Mutawa declined to comment on what the deal was worth but said he expected it to produce a profitable line of merchandise in partnership with Hasbro.

“The more successful we are, the more you can actually measure it by the amount of comic books sold, the number of people watching the animation or the number of toys sold,” he said. “That tells you that you’ve made some kind of impact.”

Since launching in 2006, The 99 has been praised for reinforcing positive Islamic messages. It is published in eight languages and a theme park opened in Kuwait last year.

The series received an endorsement from Barack Obama, the US president, last month in a speech on improving relations between the US and the Arab world through entrepreneurship.

Mr al Mutawa said the animation in The 99 would “set the bar of television animation globally”, while a preview of the show reveals it will use a new 3D technique.

“For too long, we’ve been focused in the Gulf at being the first or biggest in something, but that’s irrelevant,” he said. “The standards need to be global and we can and will achieve that.”

London Muslim Newspaper Praises Obama For Not Tying Terrorism To Islam

Good grief. When an American President is praised by the likes of a publication like London's Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper, you know you are looking at jihad taking over America.

The following article is taken from MEMRI and showcases an editorial from the radical islamist paper in London that lauds President Barack Hussein Obama for the way he is keeping the whole discussion of Islam out of the upswing of terror going on in America. The editor is very adamant about the differences between Obama and George W. Bush - you get it, Bush was bad for islamists, Obama is good for islamists.

So, the hit parade continues - the praise for our President now includes a radical islamic newspaper from London joining the list that contains leaders from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the Taliban, the dictators of Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaraugua and frankly, more than I can list right now. The evil in this world is very happy with our choice of Presidents.

'Al-Sharq Al-Awsat' Deputy Editor Praises: "The Obama Administration… [for Taking] the Initiative to Remove the Term 'Islamic Terrorism' From Its Documents and Official Transactions"


In a May 12, 2010 op-ed titled "Why Didn't Obama Mention Islam?" in the London daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, the paper's deputy editor-in-chief, Osman Mirghani, commented on how U.S. President Barack Obama's administration is dealing with recent terrorist operations in the U.S., contrasting it with his predecessor George W. Bush's handling of similar incidents. He notes the Obama administration's move to "remove the term 'Islamic terrorism' from its documents and official transactions," explained that the U.S. is "no longer responding to extremist voices" calling for targeting the terrorists' home countries, and enumerates other changes made by the administration.

He concludes by stating that Obama is definitely trying to "confront the negative stereotype of Islam' as he promised to do in his June 2009 speech at Cairo University.

Following is the article, in the original English.

Obama "Avoided Mentioning Islam in Discussing the Terrorist Operation"

"There is a huge difference between the way the Obama administration dealt with the recent terrorist operations and the way the administration of former president George W. Bush dealt with similar operations. Obama's administration, on all levels, was eager to deal with American-Pakistani Faisal Shahzad's attempt to blow up a car in Times Square in New York with a lot of deliberation and without hastily issuing statements, also avoiding any suggestions of a link between terrorism and Islam.

"After the failed terrorist attack, Obama said that his country would not be intimidated and that the investigations will seek to determine if the suspect in the case had links to 'foreign extremist organizations.' He did not once refer to the religion of Faisal Shahzad and avoided mentioning Islam in discussing the terrorist operation."

"Obama Spoke About [the Failed Christmas Day Bomber] As a Member of the Al-Qaeda Organization – But [Not] About Him Being a Muslim"

"A few months ago, following the botched attempt of Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalib to blow up a U.S. airliner over America on Christmas Day, Obama spoke about the detained terrorist as a member of the Al-Qaeda organization but he did not speak about him being a Muslim. Even when he spoke about Al-Qaeda, Obama noted that it was not the first time that the network had targeted America, ignoring the links that were made in the past between the organization and Islam or when it was put in the context of 'Islamic extremism.'

"When Major Nidal Malik Hasan killed 13 people at the Fort Hood military base in Texas last November President Obama 'cautioned against jumping to conclusions.' In all of his statements after that crime was committed, President Obama focused on troop morale and the issue of psychological pressure as a result of the war, ignoring the fact that Nidal Malik Hasan is a Muslim and of Arab origin."

"The Obama Administration Took the Initiative to Remove the Term 'Islamic Terrorism' From Its Documents and Official Transactions"

"The Obama administration took the initiative to remove the term 'Islamic terrorism' from its documents and official transactions after the US President announced that he wanted to turn a new page with regards to the Islamic world. There is recognition today of the fact that terrorists are benefiting from the creation of an anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim atmosphere after any terrorist operation, and that issuing statements or taking steps that target Muslims employed by extremist groups further spreads hostility against the U.S., the West, and even moderate Islamic states.

"Moreover, the war on terror is a universal war; it cannot be won without international cooperation. Terrorism does not target the U.S. alone; the Islamic states were victims of terrorism long before it reached the American borders."

"The U.S. Is No Longer Responding To Extremist Voices That Call For Targeting the Countries To Which The Terrorists Belong"

"Because the policy of invading countries as a strategy to confront terrorism cannot be followed, as this policy has human, military, financial and moral costs, the U.S. is no longer responding to extremist voices that call for targeting the countries to which the terrorists belong. The identity of the terrorist does not necessarily implicate the country he belongs to, in the same way that other adherents of the religion the terrorist follows should not be condemned.

"The person who attempted the recent explosion in New York was Pakistani, and it is believed that he carried out his attempt with instruction and training from the Pakistani Taliban; this doesn't mean that Pakistan is involved in the case or that it must be subjected to U.S. strikes, which is what some extremist voices call for. Pakistan is engaged in a war against the Taliban and its cooperation in the war against terror is considered vital and necessary for fighting this disease."

"The Case Of Faisal Shahzad Destroys the Logic of Extremists... Because the Perpetrator Comes From America Itself"

"The paradox lies in the fact that the case of Faisal Shahzad destroys the logic of extremists from the core because the perpetrator comes from America itself, where he lived and worked and has U.S. citizenship. Moreover, the person who is said to have influenced his thinking is Sheikh Anwar Al-Awlaki, who also has U.S. citizenship. More importantly, it emerged that Major Nidal Malik Hasan and the Nigerian Omar Farouk Abdulmuttalib were also influenced by Al-Awlaki."

"Despite Numerous Attempts by Moderate Voices, The Bush Administration Remained Captive to the Big Stick Policy and Slogans Of 'You're Either With Us Or Against Us,' Which Caused The Popularity Of The U.S. To Wane"

"The Al-Qaeda organization used youngsters of different nationalities in terrorist operations, and at first it succeeded at having an impact on America's relations with the various countries that those operatives belonged to. The organization benefited from the atmosphere of suspicion that prevailed in America's relations with numerous Islamic countries, just as it exploited the anti-Islamic atmosphere in order to add fuel to the fire of anger and extremism.

"Despite numerous attempts by moderate voices, the Bush administration remained captive to the Big Stick policy and slogans of 'you're either with us or against us,' which caused the popularity of the U.S. to wane, not only in the Islamic world but in numerous countries around the world."

In His Cairo Speech, Obama "Pledged That He Would Confront the Negative Stereotype Of Islam... There Is No Doubt That He Is Trying To Do That"

"When Obama entered the White House, his election was not a message of hope and inspiration to America alone, but to the entire world, that welcomed the message of change. Since day one, the new president has extended his hand to the Islamic world; he delivered speeches from Ankara and Cairo and he appointed an envoy from the Organization of the Islamic Conference.

"More importantly, U.S. discourse has changed, and the tendency to link every terrorist operation to the religion of the perpetrator has disappeared. In the speech Obama made to the Islamic world from Cairo last year, he pledged that he would confront the negative stereotype of Islam... there is no doubt that he is trying to do that as demonstrated by the American discourse following the recent terrorist operations."

What Is the Islamic Deobandi Movement in America? And Will It Kill Us?

Another great piece up at Family Security Matters about the growing threat to the United States by the islamists. Is anyone taking notes on all of this?

Exclusive: Deadly Muslim Deobandi Movement Now Present Throughout America


The radical Deobandi movement, an ultra-conservative manifestation of Islam, is spreading throughout the United States without capturing the attention of major media outlines. Sheikh Riyadh ul Haq, one of the movement’s most influential preachers, has voiced his support of al Qaeda and the Taliban and his hatred of all Western values.

The movement, which calls upon Muslims to “shed blood for Allah,” already controls more than half the mosques in Great Britain. In America, the Deobandi has gained solid footing in America thanks to the efforts of Tablighi Jamaat missionaries.

One such missionary was Sheikh Mubarek Gilani who set up over 40 compounds for jihadi training throughout the country, including Islamberg in Hancock, New York.
After undergoing training at these compounds, the Muslim recruits are dispatched to Pakistan where many have joined forces with al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Jamaat ul-Fuqra, Gilani’s organization, is fully funded by Tablighi Jamaat with contributions from wealthy Saudi benefactors. The same group supports 600 of Britain’s 1,350 mosques. The Deobandi also remains largely responsible for the spread of radical Islam throughout the national prison system.

The prison undertaking was led by Sheikh Ismail Abdul Rahman, who established the Sankore Mosque within Green Haven prison in New York state. At present, 90 percent of the U.S. converts to Islam are African-American; 60 percent become Muslim in prison.

Another American manifestation of the Deobandi is the National Ummah Movement which seeks to establish sovereign Islamic enclaves within major American cities.
Some of the Ummah mosques maintain armed militias. Others provide training in martial arts and guerilla warfare. Almost all operate beneath the radar of local, state, and federal law enforcement officials.

On October 28, 2009, the FBI raided a warehouse in Detroit and two houses in Detroit and arrested eleven Ummah members on charges of mail fraud, the illegal possession of firearms, trafficking in stolen goods, and altering vehicle identification numbers.

In the course of the raid on the warehouse, Luqman Ameen Abdullah, the ringleader of the group, opened fire on the federal agents and was killed in the ensuing gunfight.
Luqman Abdullah was the imam of the Masjid al-Haqq in Detroit, a mosque that was part of the Ummah network.

A short list of other mosques with ties to the Ummah and the Deobandi is as follows:

The Universal Islamic Brotherhood in Cleveland

West End Community in Atlantic

Ta’if Tul Ministry in Los Angeles

First Cleveland Mosque

Masjid al-Islam – Washington, DC

Dar al-Hijrah – Falls Church, Virginia

Masjid Mohammad – Washington, DC

Peace in the Hood – Cleveland

Masjid Bilal – Lexington, Kentucky

Masjid Waritheen – Oakland, California

Masjid Ibrahim – Sacramento

Sankore Institute – Green Haven Penitentiary

Community Mosque – Winston-Salem

Adams Center – Washington, DC

Masjid Mujahidin – New York City

Masjid al-Mumin – New York City

Masjid al-Taqwa – New York City

In Britain, 17 of the 26 Islamic seminaries are run by Deobandis. These seminaries produce 80 percent of the country’s Muslim clerics.

Tablighi Jamaat was founded in 1926, in India, by a Deobandi scholar, Muhammad Ilyas, who wanted to raise Islamic awareness among rural Muslims in south Asia. He promised them that by obeying Islamic laws and following the example of the Prophet Muhammad in their personal lives they would one day “dominate over non-believers” and become “masters of everything on this earth.”

Ishaq Patel, Tablighi Jamaat’s first emir (leader) in Britain, is said to have been on pilgrimage in Mecca when Ilyas’s successor gave him a long-term mission to win “the whole of Britain to Islam.”

Yoginder Sikand, a Muslim expert on the movement, says that its ethos of “social and cultural separatism and insularity” seeks “to minimize contacts with people of other faiths.”

Ebrahim Rangooni, a leading proponent of the movement, says that Tablighi Jamaat through the Deobandi seeks to “rescue the ummah [the global Muslim community] from the culture and civilization of the Jews, the Christians and [other] enemies of Islam.” Its aim, he writes, is to “create such hatred for their ways as human beings have for urine and excreta.”

British Man Left With 68 Stitches in Face After Muslim Gang Attack

The stories from Britain continue to flood in about just how dangerous it is on the streets of Britain for normal citizens as they run into the intimidation and violence of the islamic horde of gangs.

This story comes from The Opinionator and I cannot excerpt it totally below due to length but I encourage you to read the entire piece at their site.

Here's what happened to this young British father out for a stroll with his girlfriend and young son:

Now we have "Reece Johnson, 23, who was left with a six-inch laceration that needed 68 stitches after being attacked by a mob of 20 Asian 'youths'. Medics told him that the blade had stopped just short of his jugular vein and that he could have bled to death......He was then set upon and punched before one of the gang cut open his left cheek with a Stanley knife....Mr Johnson was taken to a specialist facial unit at the Royal Blackburn Hospital on Saturday night. He was given 20 stitches inside his face and another 48 on the outside."

Now, from the same article, I want to show you a list of headlines in Britain about the violence and terror being inflicted upon the British population by the islamic gangs (these are actual links to stories but I will not activate the links here):

Muslim Gang Rapes Man in Manchester Centre

Muslim gang robs & forces 3 teen boys to "Lick our boots"

MUSLIM GANG USES IRON PIPES AND CLUBS TO BLUDGEON 14 YR OLD ENGLISH BOY

GANG OF 15 BASEBALL BAT WIELDING MUSLIMS ATTACK BRITISH MAN

TEENAGER BEATEN IN PARK ATTACK

Son Brutally Murdered By "Asians" Yet Grieving British Mum Worries About Safety of Local Muslims

RACIST MUSLIM GANGS ATTACK & RAPE BRITISH WOMEN

POLICE HUNT THUGS IN FAITH HATE ATTACK AGAINST CLERGYMAN

2nd LONDON EAST END PRIEST ATTACKED & BEATEN BY MUSLIMS

MUSLIM THUGS CONTINUE TO TAKE OVER EAST END LONDON

DISABLED ELDERLY MAN LATEST VICTIM OF BRITAIN'S "STREET JIHAD"

12 & 13 YR. OLD PAPERBOY BROTHERS ATTACKED & BEATEN BY MUSLIM GANG

MUSLIM STREET JIHAD LEAVES BRITISH MAN BRAIN DAMAGED

This is what awaits America, people. This is what happens when muslim immigrants are appeased and allowed the status inherent from a successful campaign of "islamophobia" - the strategy of soft jihad is very simple - the political correctness of islamophobia is put in place in society, the islamic population is thus protected by "special rights", the threat of hate crime punishment against muslims is so severe that no one will dare strike back against the invaders and then, with sharia law in place, the citizenry is helpless against the then violent intimidation of the islamists.

These are British headlines above ... at what point will those headlines be appearing in Columbus, Ohio or in Little Rock, Arkansas or in Jacksonsville, Florida?

British Man left with 68 stitches in his face after brutal muslim gang slash attack

Now we have "Reece Johnson, 23, who was left with a six-inch laceration that needed 68 stitches after being attacked by a mob of 20 Asian 'youths'. Medics told him that the blade had stopped just short of his jugular vein and that he could have bled to death......He was then set upon and punched before one of the gang cut open his left cheek with a Stanley knife....Mr Johnson was taken to a specialist facial unit at the Royal Blackburn Hospital on Saturday night. He was given 20 stitches inside his face and another 48 on the outside." See article below

Young Mr Johnson will be left with a gigantic scar across his face and his 5 year old son, Tyrel, is traumatised from watching his father being brutally attacked and slashed.

So what was the supposed motive for this heinous violent attack? The excuse - and you know that law enforcement and judges will always give muslims an "excuse"for criminal behaviours, was revenge for a 2007 attack by 2 white teens that resulted in a death of a muslim man. Both assailants are now serving time for the crime.

Mr Johnson had nothing to do with that incident.

A clear sign of the cowardly nature of these racist, Kuffarophobic muslim thugs is they only attack is when they are in much greater numbers than the victims. This muslim gang proceeded to exact their racist, vigilante wrath onto the innocent Reece Johnson.

"They were saying "your lot killed one of ours" meaning white people killed an Asian lad.

'One of the guys was acting aggressively and the group was swearing and hurling racist abuse. They were very racist.

'I saw one of them in front of me with a small hand knife and I was watching him. But then another lad came at the side of me and punched me and that's when I was slashed." See article below

Reece Johnson - left with a large, highly visible facial scar covering the once gaping wound - worries:

"I'm scarred for life now and people might look at me and think I'm a violent thug.'

So the innocent victim will bear the mark of a 'violent thug'.

There is also eerie similarity to THE most despicable race hate crime in Scotland/Britain - the horrific murder of 15 year old schoolboy, Kriss Donald - who was tortured and killed by muslim gang/men for no other reason than the young lad was white.

as well as Rob Hughes, who was left with the imprint of a trainer on his forehead and nose following a vicious muslim gang attack.

AND brothers Thomas and David Barry, had their bodies pummelled and their faces smashed when they were set upon by a gang of up to 30 "youths" armed with hammers. The brothers had gone outside the pub to go to the aid of Thomas's son and his 16 yr. old girlfriend who the muslim gang had already attacked.

So far what is the sum total result of the police investigation into the muslim slasher-gang attack on Mr. Johnson?

Aren't You Thrilled? Your Tax Dollars Go To Support Radical Islamic Schools In America

Read it and weep from Family Security Matters:

Exclusive: Radical Islamic Schools Thrive Throughout America



Network Drains Millions from American Taxpayers

Turkish Muslims, under the leadership of Fethullah Gulen, have established over 85 madrassahs (Islamic schools) throughout the United States to further the cause of radical Islam. The madrassahs, set up as “charter schools,” receive millions from U.S. taxpayers and serve to promote “education jihad” by radicalizing students to promote a universal caliphate.

How dangerous are the Gulen schools?

Consider Tarek ibn Ziyad (TIZA) Academy in Inner Grove Heights, Minnesota – a charter school with 300 students – almost all Muslims. TIZA was established in 2003, and received $4.7 million from Minnesota taxpayers in 2008 – 2009. It is named after Tarek ibn Ziyas, the Muslim warlord who conquered Spain.

Students at TIZA pray Islamic prayers; the cafeteria serves halal food; and Islamic studies are held within the building every day. The
entranceway is inscribed with passages from the Koran and the Hadith. Recently, a TIZA teacher testified that one of her duties was taking the female students to the restroom in order to supervise their ritual washing before the Friday prayer service.

TIZA is so radically Islamic and subversive in nature that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has initiated a lawsuit to shut it down. In the suit, the ACLU maintains that the school requires female teachers to be covered “from neck to wrist and ankle,” and female students to wear full-length dresses (jihaabs). Yet the Minnesota Department of Education ruled that TIZA is neither an Islamic nor a religious school.

The decision remains quizzical in light of the fact that TIZA is closely linked to the Muslim American Society (MAS) of Minnesota, which occupies space within the school building. MAS has been called “the Muslim equivalent of the Neo-Nazi party.”

"It is the de facto arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S.," said Steven Emerson, director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism. "The agenda of the MAS is to ... impose Islamic law in the U.S., to undermine U.S. counterterrorism policy."

MAS was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, an international Islamist movement created in Egypt in 1928. Radical members of the Brotherhood founded the terror group Hamas and were among the first members of Al Qaeda. The Muslim American Society's former secretary general has acknowledged that the group was founded by the Brotherhood, and in 2004 he estimated that about half of MAS members were in the Muslim Brotherhood. "Ikhwan [Brotherhood] members founded MAS, but MAS went way beyond that point of conception," Shaker Elsayed told the Chicago Tribune, explaining that the group had expanded to include a wider viewpoint.

The Department of Justice has never taken action against MAS and declined to comment on whether it was investigating the group's ties.
Charles Samuelson, Minnesota’s Executive Director of the ACLU, says that the Gulen charter school funnels money – derived from US taxpayers – to MAS without a word of censure from the Minnesota Department of Education or the Internal Revenue officials who supervise the activities of non-profit schools and organizations. The Minnesota chapter of MAS featured writings on its website from Islamic clerics praising Hamas and urging Muslims to "wage Jihad until death."

Last December, the Minnseota chapter funded Rep. Keith Ellison’s trip to Mecca. Ellison, a Democrat, became the first U.S. congressman to make a hajj.

"Their founding ideologues are all members of the Muslim Brotherhood," Emerson said. "I don't think you can get more radical in the United States without crossing the line to incitement."

TIZA is not unique. Other Gulen schools within the U.S., including the Beehive Academy in Salt Lake City, the Chesapeake Science Point School in Washington D.C., and the Sonoran Academy in Tucson have been charged with indoctrinating students in the tenets of radical Islam so they may be of service in the restoration of the Ottoman Empire and the creation of an Islamic world order.

Most of these schools are staffed by Turkish teachers – primarily male – who reportedly are bound by tuzuk – an obligatory pay back of 40 percent of their wages to the Gulen movement.

Stay tuned…more on Gulen and the threat of his movement to national security forthcoming.

Toronto Police Review Procedures Due To Religious Criticism - Oh Wait, Wasn't It Just MUSLIM Criticism?

Typical story that splashes across the pages of the internet every damn day now - a muslim makes a complaint to city officials and the entire city's governmental system grabs a prayer mat and bends over to appease the poor victimized islamist.

This is a case where a muslim woman from Toronto, Ontario, Canada complained that Toronto police removed her hijab to check her identity - you know, a TOTAL infringement of her rights just like some Christian young man last winter who had to take off his ski mask in order to prove his identity. So, after that complaint surfaced, the Toronto police have gone into full appeasement mode - I don't know...do they fear a bunch of cars being burnt like in Paris?

From the article at CBC News:

Donald Bevers, manager of corporate planning with Toronto police, is leading the policy review, which began with a meeting involving members of various religious communities in March.
The review includes how religious items such as prayer beads, hijabs and the Koran are handled in searches, and how officers conduct searches when the people involved are members of such religions as Islam, Sikhism and Buddhism.
The changes are expected to begin this fall.
"I think what we have to look at here is, not what has occurred in the past, but how do we move forward from that?" Bevers said. "And how do we also make ourselves better so that we don't get back into that?"

The article makes countless references to "religious communities" but yet every action noted in the article is concerning the muslims. So why even have a reference to "religious" to begin with? Call a spade a spade - this is all part of the soft jihad strategy that seeks SPECIAL rights for muslims in a society that is intended to have equal rights. If you're a muslim, you can hide your face from the law - no one else can. If you're a muslim, you can make threats on an airliner, but no one else can. If you're a muslim, you can insist on a foot bath be installed with tax payer dollars at your community college, but a Christian or Jew can't even pray in the building. It goes on and on. And it will continue to go on and on until the governments of Canada and America finally throw their hands up in the air and just allow the muslims to be ruled by their own Sharia law throughout the land.

Toronto police review handling of religions


The Toronto police service has started an internal review on how officers conduct searches and arrests when dealing with people from various religions, CBC News has learned.

The review was sparked by a human rights complaint in July 2008 after a police officer removed a Muslim woman's hijab, or head scarf.

The complaint eventually made its way to the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, where it was settled out of court before a hearing could occur this past January.

Due to privacy rules, CBC News was not able to obtain a copy of the complaint or learn the identity of the Muslim woman.

Donald Bevers, manager of corporate planning with Toronto police, is leading the policy review, which began with a meeting involving members of various religious communities in March.

The review includes how religious items such as prayer beads, hijabs and the Koran are handled in searches, and how officers conduct searches when the people involved are members of such religions as Islam, Sikhism and Buddhism.

The changes are expected to begin this fall.

"I think what we have to look at here is, not what has occurred in the past, but how do we move forward from that?" Bevers said. "And how do we also make ourselves better so that we don't get back into that?"

Bevers said there aren't a lot of similar policies on the subject in other police services.

"We have a chance now to move forward to create a policy that hopefully other services may be able to take a look at," he said.

Police meet with Muslim community
Police are also working on new procedures and training for all police officers, college cadets, voluntary officers and prisoner transport officers, Bevers said.

Police have already met with members of Toronto's Muslim community to talk about the issues.

Rukhsana Syed has met with the police once a month for the past six years as part of the Muslim Consultative Committee. Syed said she welcomes the police's review.

She said it would be embarrassing and "very traumatic" for a Muslim woman to have her hijab taken off in a public place.

Instead, the best way to handle a woman who is wearing a hijab is to have the head covering taken off by a female police officer in a private setting when removal is necessary, Syed said.

"If there is a concern for the safety of the officer and the people around, [then] take [the woman] aside," Syed told CBC News.

Police In California Are Now Treating Burned Qur'an Case As A Hate Crime

Give me a damn break. This story came out a few days ago but it's now been updated in the police eyes as a "hate crime." Burning a Qur'an is now a hate crime?!!! WTF?

From CBS2:

Police say they are investigating a burnt Quran found outside an Orange County mosque as a hate crime.

The Orange County Register reported Friday that Costa Mesa police Sgt. Phil Meyers said elements of the incident have led authorities to believe it was a crime of hate. A congregant of the Islamic Educational Center of Orange County found the torched Quran in the parking lot on New Year's Day. The incident upset congregants who gasped when they saw the burned book.

Okay, before I blow a gasket here, let me just say that this whole incident, in my view, is bogus as hell. This member of this mosque just happens upon a burned Qur'an in the mosque parking lot ...while everyone else is inside, of course...so he runs into the mosque and delivers the scorched word of the moongod to the imam in front of the whole "congregation" and of course, they all groan and moan and scream in anguish. I'd say that Haji pretty much burned the damn thing himself and decided to get the whole place all riled up, don't you?

But, looking past that...what does this all mean? If burning a Qur'an is a hate crime, then what does it mean to place a Crucifix in a vile of human urine? Oh, I forgot, that's "art." So let me ask the question...can I go into a bookstore, buy a Qur'an, sit on my front porch and burn said Qur'an or will the police come arrest me? Let me ask another question - if an islamist in Dearborn, Michigan joined a protest in the middle of main street and proceeded to burn a Holy Bible for all to see, do you think he'd be arrested for a hate crime?

I, personally, detest the very invention of "hate crime." I'm of belief that crime is crime - it is a violation of laws on the books. If I burn a Qur'an, how can you possibly prove that I did it out of "hate" ? If I'm a white man and walk into a convenience store and shoot dead the Hispanic clerk and don't take a thing from the store, did I kill out of hate? Who gives a shit. I broke the law of murdering or manslaughtering a human being. That's my crime and I face the punishment.

Part of the freedoms in this country are not to be criminalized for expression - if I want to burn a U.S. flag, I can do that. If I want to burn a Qur'an, I can do that. If I want to paint a swastika, I can do that. If I burn a cross on another man's property, I've committed a crime of endangerment and trespassing. If I paint a swastika on a community center wall, I'm guilty of vandalism and trespassing. But the islamists will push this hate crime issue to the limit...it is, after all, part of the soft jihad in America which is hellbent on altering the freedoms of Americans in regards to the treatment of muslims.

What's next? If I draw a cartoon of Mohammed fucking a goat in my notebook at college, I'll be arrested for a hate crime?

Police Probe Burned Quran At Mosque As Hate Crime

COSTA MESA, Calif. (AP) Police say they are investigating a burnt Quran found outside an Orange County mosque as a hate crime.

The Orange County Register reported Friday that Costa Mesa police Sgt. Phil Meyers said elements of the incident have led authorities to believe it was a crime of hate.

A congregant of the Islamic Educational Center of Orange County found the torched Quran in the parking lot on New Year's Day. The incident upset congregants who gasped when they saw the burned book.

That same day, the Muslim component of a holiday display was defaced in the Orange County city of Mission Viejo. Authorities do not believe the two incidents are linked.

CAIR Using Courts Again For Soft Jihad: C.A.I.R. Asks IRS To Probe Group Distributing Anti-Jihad DVD

Well, the islamic terrorists at C.A.I.R. are at it again with another legal manuever to try and influence their soft jihad in America. This time, CAIR is going after the Clarion Group for distributing a dvd entitled, “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West” - what CAIR is doing here is trying to spin their dislike for this dvd actually being in circulation with some lame legal mumbo jumbo that the Clarion Group is trying to influence the 2008 elections. I guess CAIR seems to think that Barack Obama represents the muslim vote in America and thus this video may sway voters from Obama? As my readers know, I will NOT link to CAIR's website so I have excerpted the entire article from CAIR's site below.

But just remember this folks, this is just another example of CAIR not trying to protect the rights of muslims in America - this is another example of CAIR trying to CHANGE your rights in America. CAIR does not wish the muslims of America to assimilate to the culture, traditions and laws of America but rather for Americans to assimilate to the laws and "religion" of Islam.

As I have stated many times, the offices of CAIR headquarters are inhabited by terrorists who support Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. They have turned the American legal system into a suicide bomber's belt, they have used attorneys as IED's and they have used the MSM as their very own al Jezeera. And if you vote for Barack Obama, not only will you see CAIR's position in America strengthen, I am convinced you will see a CAIR member in the cabinet of Obama.

Here's the article:

CAIR Asks IRS to Probe Group Behind Swing State Anti-Muslim DVDs

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 9/30/08) - A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today said it has asked the IRS to investigate whether the non-profit organization behind distribution of an anti-Muslim film to 28 million homes in presidential election swing states has violated laws governing its tax-exempt status.
The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is urging the IRS to find out if the Clarion Fund, a shadowy non-profit group distributing DVDs of “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West,” is being “operated exclusively for the exempt purpose of educating ‘Americans about issues of national security’” as it claims.
In a letter to Steven T. Miller, commissioner of the IRS’s Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, CAIR wrote in part:
“[I]ndependent observers have suggested that the distribution of the DVD was an obvious attempt by the Clarion Fund to participate in campaign activities and intervene in the 2008 presidential election.”
The letter quoted the editorial page editor of the Palm Beach Post, who wrote: “Last week, an ad for John McCain came with The Post. But it wasn't labeled as an ad for John McCain…Distribution of the DVD, whose producers say it will ‘change the way you look at the world,’ was timed with the post-Labor Day start of presidential election season. About 95 percent of the papers that contained the DVD are in Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada and New Hampshire…”
CAIR asked the IRS, if evidence of wrongdoing is uncovered, to consider stripping the Clarion Fund of its tax-exempt status, tax funds it spent on prohibited activities and impose an injunction on further political expenditures.
“A non-profit group’s tax-exempt status should not be misused to promote political candidates or to influence the outcome of an election,” said CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad.
Awad noted that even those involved in the production and promotion of “Obsession” are now having second thoughts about backing what the vast majority of commentators are calling anti-Muslim “propaganda.”
The Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET), a pro-Israel think tank, pulled out of “The Obsession Project” after CAIR filed an FEC complaint seeking an investigation the Clarion Fund’s possible violations of election laws.

Dr. Khaleel Mohammed, a Muslim interviewee for “Obsession,” now calls the production a "vile piece of propaganda." In a statement sent to the www.obsessionwithhate.com website, Dr. Mohammed said: “Sadly, it would seem that I have allowed myself to be used.”
The “Obsession with Hate” site was launched recently by the Hate Hurts America Multifaith Community Coalition (HHA), a group of religious and civic organizations seeking to challenge hate speech in our society. HHA's site offers a point-by-point rebuttal to propagandistic claims made in the film, as well as a list of newspapers that delivered the film's DVD as an insert, a sampling of bigoted statements made by anti-Muslim figures interviewed for "Obsession," and examples of the overwhelmingly negative media coverage of the Clarion Fund's controversial campaign to influence voters.
A recent article in the St. Petersburg Times revealed ties between the film's distributors and the Israel-based group Aish HaTorah. The newspaper’s investigative report stated: “Clarion's address, according to Manhattan directory assistance, is the same address as Aish HaTorah International, a fundraising arm of Aish HaTorah. The Clarion Fund and Aish HaTorah International are also connected to a group called HonestReporting, which produced Obsession. Honest­Reporting's 2006 tax return uses the same address.”