You know, when the State of Arizona decided to pass SB 1070, it was apparent from the very next day that Barack Hussein Obama and his thug-like Department of Justice were going to make this example of a state flexing its sovereignty a death match. Let's face it...centralized government Marxists like Obama and Holder certainly could not allow a U.S. state to be so bold as to look out for their own welfare. And so now, Obama and Holder have called in all of the troops - as the United Nations and Latin American countries have all begun the onslaught on America's jewel in the southwest, the state of Arizona.
From the article at Family Security Matters:
On Monday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to SB 1070, which Brewer signed into law in April, and went into effect in late July, and is considered one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.
And now, in what is considered an accusation against the United States and European nations cracking down on illegal immigration, the United Nations released a warning to governments worldwide that they must respect and protect the rights of all “migrants in an irregular situation.”
Aimed largely at Arizona’s new immigration control law and the recent French expulsions of Roma migrants, the rather amusing U.N. admonition calls upon states to ensure that their laws conform with “international human rights standards and guarantees at all stages of the migration process,” according to Judicial Watch, a public-interest group that investigates political corruption.
To steal one of Obama's lines....."let me be clear on this" ... the initial assault by Obama on Arizona's SB 1070 had NOTHING to do with immigration law or even profiling of minorities. NOTHING. This was all about setting the precedent of Federal centralized government versus states rights. Picture a Soviet satellite country, like a Georgia, back in the 1980's, trying to pass a law that gives them some muscle and then picture the response by the Communist leadership in Moscow. That is what we are seeing here...and while Holder and his gang of Bolsheviks in the Justice Department await further legal reviews of their suit against Arizona, the Obama administration has invited every other possible country to attack one of our very own states.
And just to put some icing on this assassination cake, Hillary Clinton, months ago, opened the door for the United Nations to get into the mix and bring Human Rights charges against a member of our Union.
Get used to this people...this is going to be the way it goes under the iron rule of a guy who truly wants his dictatorship. Let's sum this all up very bluntly and simply. Barack Hussein Obama, the President of the United States of America, has not only thrown of us his 50 sheep to the wolves....he has led the wolves to the meadow where the sheep are asleep and he has said, "Do as you wish."
U.N., Latin America Join Attack on Arizona
On Monday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to SB 1070, which Brewer signed into law in April, and went into effect in late July, and is considered one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.
And now, in what is considered an accusation against the United States and European nations cracking down on illegal immigration, the United Nations released a warning to governments worldwide that they must respect and protect the rights of all “migrants in an irregular situation.”
Aimed largely at Arizona’s new immigration control law and the recent French expulsions of Roma migrants, the rather amusing U.N. admonition calls upon states to ensure that their laws conform with “international human rights standards and guarantees at all stages of the migration process,” according to Judicial Watch, a public-interest group that investigates political corruption.
U.N. officials stated that local governments must protect illegal immigrants’ “fundamental rights,” including the right to be free from “arbitrary arrest or detention” as well as the right to “seek and enjoy asylum from persecution.”
Illegal aliens must also have economic, social and cultural rights, which include health, adequate housing, education and favorable conditions of work,” according to the U.N.
States such as Arizona that pass measures to curb illegal immigration are “driven by hostile domestic constituencies,” the U.N. asserts. Too often these states address “irregular migration solely through the lens of sovereignty, border security or law enforcement…” Deep stuff from the scandal-plagued group that’s largely sustained with American tax dollars, said Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton.
Buried in the U.N.’s enlightening two-page statement is an acknowledgement that states have legitimate interests in securing their borders and exercising immigration control. However, those concerns cannot trump the obligations to respect international law which guarantees all persons -- even “migrants in an irregular situation -- the necessary rights to enjoy a “life of dignity and security.”
The warning provokes outrage as well as laughter considering the U.N.’s own Human Rights Council is best known for the oppressive regimes that comprise it. Among them are the world’s worst human rights violators, including Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, China and Russia. These countries don’t even offer their own citizens rights or protections, much less to transitional migrants, according to Judicial Watch.
Meanwhile, Judicial Watch seeks documents pertaining to the Obama administration’s contacts with third party organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), in making the decision to file the lawsuit.
Judicial Watch specifically seeks the following documents through its FOIA request originally filed on June 17, 2010:
Any and all communications between the Department of Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), concerning, regarding, or relating to Arizona’s “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act,” also referred to as “Arizona SB 1070.”
No comments:
Post a Comment