The forces of world global control based upon climate change legislation are really digging for an out due to the scandal of "ClimateGate" so now, the United Nations is trying to deflect any wrong-doing of the scientists on the global warming front to the so-called hackers that uncovered the incriminating evidence. Yes, that's right - the United Nations has decided to focus on the illegal activities of those uncovering the evidence than looking at the evidence that was uncovered.
Maybe I'm crazy but this seems to be like looking at the case of "Cold Cash" Jefferson, the Congressman found to have thousands of bribe money in his freezer, and saying that Rep. Jefferson was the victim in that case because the FBI agents who uncovered his illegal activities were probably motivated by allegiance to conservative values.
Let's look at what was said in this report from the Times Online:
And here, we see U.N. officials BLATANTLY calling for all scrutinization of the data collecting of the Climate change scientists to be called off:
As most of you know, this isn't a subject I really care to blog about - not that I don't care about it and that it's important but it isn't my thing. But this is so blatantly biased and coerced that I couldn't let it go. If anyone can look at these statements and not conclude that their is a world-wide conspiracy to invoke the iron fist legislation of climate change upon world governments and the people of this planet, you've gotta be higher than a kite.
Maybe I'm crazy but this seems to be like looking at the case of "Cold Cash" Jefferson, the Congressman found to have thousands of bribe money in his freezer, and saying that Rep. Jefferson was the victim in that case because the FBI agents who uncovered his illegal activities were probably motivated by allegiance to conservative values.
Let's look at what was said in this report from the Times Online:
Mr van Ypersele said that publication of the e-mails had undermined efforts by the IPCC to convince the 192 countries at Copenhagen that they needed to act fast on emissions.
"One effect of this is to make scientists lose lots of time checking things.
"We are spending a lot of useless time discussing this rather than spending time preparing information for the negotiators."
He rejected claims by sceptics that the e-mails showed efforts had been made to manipulate the data to exaggerate the warming trend.
And here, we see U.N. officials BLATANTLY calling for all scrutinization of the data collecting of the Climate change scientists to be called off:
"This is not 'climategate' it's 'hackergate'. Let's not forget the word 'gate' refers to a place [Watergate] where data was stolen by people who were paid to do so. So the media should direct its investigations into that."
As most of you know, this isn't a subject I really care to blog about - not that I don't care about it and that it's important but it isn't my thing. But this is so blatantly biased and coerced that I couldn't let it go. If anyone can look at these statements and not conclude that their is a world-wide conspiracy to invoke the iron fist legislation of climate change upon world governments and the people of this planet, you've gotta be higher than a kite.
Climategate controversy has echoes of Watergate, UN says
UN officials likened the Climategate controversy to Watergate today, claiming that computer hackers who stole thousands of e-mails sent by a senior climate scientist were probably paid to do it by people intent on undermining the Copenhagen summit.
Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice-chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said the theft from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was not the work of amateur climate sceptics but a sophisticated and well-funded attempt to destroy public confidence in the science of man-made climate change.
He said the fact that the e-mails were first uploaded to a sceptic website from a computer in Russia was an indication that the culprit was paid.
"It's very common for hackers in Russia to be paid for their services.
"If you look at that mass of e-mails a lot of work was done, not only to download the data but it's a carefully made selection of e-mails and documents that's not random at all. This is 13 years of data and it's not a job of amateurs."
Mr van Ypersele said that publication of the e-mails had undermined efforts by the IPCC to convince the 192 countries at Copenhagen that they needed to act fast on emissions.
"One effect of this is to make scientists lose lots of time checking things.
"We are spending a lot of useless time discussing this rather than spending time preparing information for the negotiators."
He rejected claims by sceptics that the e-mails showed efforts had been made to manipulate the data to exaggerate the warming trend.
"It doesn't change anything in the IPCC's conclusions. It's only one line of evidence out of dozens of lines of evidence."
Achim Steiner, director of the UN Environment Programme, said the theft of e-mails had echoes of the Watergate scandal.
"This is not 'climategate' it's 'hackergate'. Let's not forget the word 'gate' refers to a place [Watergate] where data was stolen by people who were paid to do so. So the media should direct its investigations into that."
The hackers obtained the e-mails by breaking into a computer at the University of East Anglia. Professor Phil Jones, director of the CRU, has agreed to stand down during an independent review of the affair.
The first hack was in October or earlier and the e-mails were not leaked until mid-November. Sceptics allege that Professor Jones’s e-mails show that climate change data was manipulated and that scientists discussed how to suppress alternative views.
They were posted with a message, apparently from the hackers, which said: “We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps. We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents. Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it.”
The e-mails, which were sent over a 15-year period ending on November 12, first appeared on websites run by sceptics on November 17.
Almost a month before they were posted on a website popular with climate-change sceptics, the hacked data was sent to a BBC weatherman who had previously expressed his doubts about climate science on his blog.
The BBC has now confirmed that Paul Hudson received some of the documents on October 12. But no story was broadcast or printed by Mr Hudson or the corporation.
Then, on November 17, someone hacked into realclimate.org, a popular website among climate scientists. The hackers put all of the UEA e-mails and documents on the realclimate website, using a computer based in Turkey.
But the website’s owners responded quickly, shutting down the site within a few minutes.
Finally, using a computer in Saudi Arabia, the hackers posted a link on The Air Vent blog, a site popular among climate sceptics. The link sent readers to a file that was stored on computers in Russia. Only then did others begin to pick up on the story.
Reports today suggest that the Tomcity server based in the Siberian town of Tomsk was used to upload the e-mails on to the web.
The server is used mainly by Tomsk State University, one of the leading academic institutions in Russia, and other scientific institutes, according to the Mail on Sunday.
1 comment:
Nothing has come about to convince me that this wasn't an Inside Job.
Post a Comment