Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Canadian Soldiers Cleared Of Abuse Charges In Afghanistan Brought By Muslim College Professor


This story, here at Breitbart, should show all of us just how far some accusations by a paranoid, multi-cultural appeasing society can lead. In 2007, a flea infested muslim college professor in Ottawa, Canada decided that he thought Canadian troops in Afghanistan were abusing Taliban fighters that had been captured by the Canadians. So, after more than two years of bringing the honor and the careers of Canadian soldiers through the mud, all charges have been dropped by a board of inquiry. Of course they were dropped because the piece of shit professor HAD NO PROOF. But just because the Canadian government doesn't want to be seen as not bowing to the special rights of islamists sitting around the country, there was legitimacy put behind the charges. Here's the entire article from Breitbart:


Soldiers cleared of allegations Taliban prisoners were beaten in 2006

OTTAWA - A military investigation two years in the making has cleared Canadian soldiers of any wrongdoing in the handling of captured Taliban fighters in Kandahar.
A board of inquiry report into allegations that troops mistreat and beat prisoners taken during heavy fighting in April 2006 found, instead, they were treated "professionally and humanely."
Defence Minister Peter MacKay presented the findings to the House of Commons on Tuesday.

Vice-Admiral Jean Rouleau, the vice chief of defence staff, says the inquiry looked at whether the use of force to restrain the prisoners was appropriate and if medical care administered to them was adequate.
The investigation was opened in February 2007 after Amir Attaran, a University of Ottawa law professor and human rights advocate, uncovered through military police records what he called a suspicious and unexplained pattern of injuries among Afghan prisoners.
The Forces then ordered both a criminal investigation by military police and an internal inquiry.
So, I've pointed out the bullshit behind these charges but what I'd also like to know is this...what IF the Canadian soldiers had slammed those Taliban prisoners around a bit? No big deal in my mind. The Geneva Convention statutes do not apply to the Taliban and considering the way the Taliban have treated every single prisoner they have ever captured, I'd say it would be completely permissable to operate under "an eye for an eye."

I mean look at this...we have some moronic muslim 3500 miles away from Afghanistan creating these charges...why? Why? Because the Taliban are muslim. He didn't give a shit how many women and children those Taliban prisoners had maimed, stoned, beheaded or burned. He didn't give a shit how many schools they had burned down and he certainly didn't care how many of his own Canadian countrymen had been killed by those Taliban. He simply made the charges because they believe in the same moon god as he did. I'd put this college professor behind bars for 20 years for filing false accusations and liquidate every asset he and his family has to repay the Canadian soldiers implicated in these trumped up allegations. And when he walked out of a Canadian prison in 20 years I'd deport his ass to a mountain top in Afghanistan.

2 comments:

HFDean said...

Holger, get ready. ObamaNation is about to let this same scenario begin to happen in the USA with the liberal attitude towards 9/11 terrorists and Islamic Jihadists that are about to be let loose from Gitmo into American Society. These terrorists will stop at nothing to humiliate and discredit our fighting men and women now battling terrorism around the world. ObamaNation will continue to apologize for America's actions to safeguard our citizens from these terrorist animals.

Holger Awakens said...

HF,

I agree wholeheartedly here with you. At the same time, I am anticipating a major, MAJOR push by the Obama administration to push forward a serious islamophobia agenda complete with new hate crime definitions.

:Holger Danske