U.N.'s Atomic Agency Director Continues To Cover For The Islamists

The piece of shit Director of the United Nations' IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), Mohamed ElBaradei, can add another example of how he has covered up for islamists and jihadists across the globe as this time, he is covering up the evidence of a nuclear weapons plant in Syria. This is concerning the evidence inspected at the Syrian nuke plant that Israel destroyed and yes, this fool...this tool...ElBaradei doesn't cease to amaze yet again with his blatant co-conspirator status with the terrorists of the Arab and Persian world. Remember, this is the same doofus that more or less admitted that he had the wool pulled over his eyes by the Iranians.

Anyway, here's some of the details of what this "super sleuth" is saying about the Syrian site via the story at Reuters:

Uranium traces found at a Syrian site bombed by Israel were not sufficient evidence of undeclared nuclear activity but Syria must be more open to help clarify the issue, the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog said on Monday.
"We won't be able to reach a quick conclusion unless we have credible information," International Atomic Energy Agency Director Mohamed ElBaradei told a news conference in Dubai. "There was uranium but it does not mean there was a reactor."

What kind of bloody idiots does this moron think we are? Why is this chump still holding a director's role in this agency? Oh yeah, it's the U.N. Sorry, I lost my head there for a bit. The corruption of the United Nations is played out each and every day and this poster child for it has done more to showcase the U.N. as corrupt than anyone.

Remember, it is ElBaradei who is supposed to safeguard the lives of the people of the world from illegal Iranian nuclear weapons. Hell, this guy is looking at a report of uranium traces at the bottom of a bomb site and STILL won't admit that the Syrians were up to no good. What a shill.

ElBaradei says Syria uranium traces not conclusive

DUBAI (Reuters) - Uranium traces found at a Syrian site bombed by Israel were not sufficient evidence of undeclared nuclear activity but Syria must be more open to help clarify the issue, the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog said on Monday.
"We won't be able to reach a quick conclusion unless we have credible information," International Atomic Energy Agency Director Mohamed ElBaradei told a news conference in Dubai. "There was uranium but it does not mean there was a reactor."
The IAEA inquiry was spurred by U.S. intelligence that the site was a secret nuclear reactor Syria had almost completed when it was reduced to rubble by an Israeli air raid last year.
Syria has said the target was a disused military building.
ElBaradei said the uranium particles were not highly enriched -- the type used to fuel atomic bombs. "It could have come in so many different ways .... We are looking at so many different scenarios," he said.
Both Syria and Israel should do more to help the IAEA's investigation, he said. "We need cooperation from Syria; we need cooperation from Israel. I would still like more transparency from the Syrians," he added.
Diplomats monitoring the IAEA in Vienna told Reuters a week ago that particles of uranium had been retrieved from swipe samples taken by IAEA inspectors from the site in June.
They said the traces appeared to be of a processed form of uranium, possibly at the stage at which it would be loaded into a reactor for enrichment as fuel for civilian energy or for weapons. But the origin of the traces was unclear, they said.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem last week dismissed the disclosures about uranium particles as politically motivated and said they could have been on munitions used by Israel to bomb the site in September last year.
Depleted uranium is a hardening agent in some munitions. But it is not normally used in air force ordnance and would not have been needed to destroy the Syrian target, analysts say.
ElBaradei confirmed the IAEA's first report on its six-month-old investigation into Syria's alleged covert atomic activity, to be issued later this week, would not be conclusive.
"The report will say that there is still a lot of work to do. (There will be) no conclusion on whether there was a reactor or not," said ElBaradei, who also has been investigating Iran's disputed nuclear enrichment program since 2003.