Read this gem from Senator Hillary Clinton:
Let's dissect this from the woman who wants to lead the Free World:
1. So she agrees the Surge has worked - she admits it , that the troops "make a difference." So she admits the Surge has been effective yet as little as two months ago she looked General Petraeus in the eyes and said his update on progress required "a willing suspension of disbelief." What is it Senator Clinton? A lie or a success?
2. Hillary Clinton, whom some have put out there as a brilliant mind, is clueless. She states that "the purpose of the surge was to create space for political reconciliation..." The surge's purpose was to reduce attacks, stablize security and to eliminate al Qaeda forces.
3. Finally, this wannabe Commander-in-Chief wants us to "stop refereeing their civil war" - again, buy a clue! At this stage in the war and after documented evidence of just why the surge has worked...and after reviewing the countless pages of intelligence and battlefield reports, a yellow labrador in Ames, Iowa could tell you that the success has been due to the ouster of al Qaeda in Iraq! But I forgot, Senator Clinton - your strategy along with the Dems and the MSM all along has been to deny and minimize that al Qaeda was the real enemy in Iraq. You, once again, thought you could pull the wool over the eyes of the American people (or as you refer to us, "sheep"). Sorry lady - you were wrong, you have stayed wrong and you will always be wrong.
It is appalling that this idiotic person even holds a political post in our government, let alone has the 'nads to put her hat in the ring to run our Country. If she can't get this right, how is she going to handle all the really complicated stuff?
“Our troops are the best in the world; if you increase their numbers they are going to make a difference,” Mrs. Clinton said in a statement after her aides were asked about her views on the ebbing violence in Baghdad.
“The fundamental point here is that the purpose of the surge was to create space for political reconciliation and that has not happened, and there is no indication that it is going to happen, or that the Iraqis will meet the political benchmarks,” she said. “We need to stop refereeing their civil war and start getting out of it.”
Let's dissect this from the woman who wants to lead the Free World:
1. So she agrees the Surge has worked - she admits it , that the troops "make a difference." So she admits the Surge has been effective yet as little as two months ago she looked General Petraeus in the eyes and said his update on progress required "a willing suspension of disbelief." What is it Senator Clinton? A lie or a success?
2. Hillary Clinton, whom some have put out there as a brilliant mind, is clueless. She states that "the purpose of the surge was to create space for political reconciliation..." The surge's purpose was to reduce attacks, stablize security and to eliminate al Qaeda forces.
3. Finally, this wannabe Commander-in-Chief wants us to "stop refereeing their civil war" - again, buy a clue! At this stage in the war and after documented evidence of just why the surge has worked...and after reviewing the countless pages of intelligence and battlefield reports, a yellow labrador in Ames, Iowa could tell you that the success has been due to the ouster of al Qaeda in Iraq! But I forgot, Senator Clinton - your strategy along with the Dems and the MSM all along has been to deny and minimize that al Qaeda was the real enemy in Iraq. You, once again, thought you could pull the wool over the eyes of the American people (or as you refer to us, "sheep"). Sorry lady - you were wrong, you have stayed wrong and you will always be wrong.
It is appalling that this idiotic person even holds a political post in our government, let alone has the 'nads to put her hat in the ring to run our Country. If she can't get this right, how is she going to handle all the really complicated stuff?
1 comment:
Just stopped by your site and it looks great!
I agree that Hillary Clinton is a terrible candidate. She is right that the surge was designed to give the politicians in Iraq an opportunity to work things out. Like most Democrats, however, she wants some sort of timetable in which all parties would complete the process. This is ridiculous; it didn't work with our own republic and is unreasonable to expect in Iraq.
Post a Comment