Here you have it:
Richard Norton-TaylorTuesday November 20, 2007
Counter-terrorism officials are rethinking their approach to tackling the radicalisation of Muslim youth, abandoning what they admit has been offensive and inappropriate language. They say the term "war on terror" will no longer be heard from ministers. Instead, they will use less emotive language, emphasising the criminal nature of the plots and conspiracies. The government in future, they add, will talk of a "struggle" against extremist ideology, rather than a "battle".What? WTF is that? Not be described as a Muslim problem? Then how should it be described? A Mormon problem? A Quaker problem? A Luxembourg problem?
"We hadn't got the message right," said one senior official. He added: "We must talk in a language which is not offensive." Another said that the terrorist threat must not be described as a "Muslim problem".
You'd think after Britain's embarassment in Iran along with the bombings at home and in Scotland, they could at least show some spine at home. Go ahead and laugh at these Brits but don't forget, these are elected officials who are controlling this lunacy. Vote for the Socialists here in America in 2008 and I'll be posting the same story then but it will be from the New York Times and it will be in regards to the same bloody change happening here. Believe it.
No comments:
Post a Comment