Okay, there's a lot in the article here from The Long War Journal on the news that a senior commander of the Haqqani Network (a group aligned with the Taliban) has threatened to kill the captured U.S. soldier if U.S. and NATO troops don't withdraw from two eastern provinces of Afghanistan, so I will post the whole article below. But let's look at a few of the major pieces of information from the announcement by the Haqqanis:
A senior commander in the Haqqani Network has threatened to kill a captured US soldier unless Coalition forces end operations in two districts in Paktika and Ghazni provinces in eastern Afghanistan.
Abdullah Jalali, a spokesman for Mullah Sangeen Zadran, who claimed to have captured the soldier in late June, said the US military must end the search operations in the Giro district in Ghazni province and the Khoshamand district in Paktika or the soldier would be killed. Jalali made the statement in a telephone interview with the Associated Press.
But Jalali also said the fate of the soldier will ultimately be decided by Mullah Omar, the overall leader of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Now, look at this section about where U.S. officials actually feel the captured soldier is being held:
The soldier is probably not in Afghanistan, a US intelligence official familiar with the search told The Long War Journal. The official believes the soldier has been moved into a Haqqani Network safe house in the Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan in Pakistan.
The Haqqani Network has moved hostages across the border in the past. The most recent and high-profile case involved a US reporter from the New York Times, who was lured into meeting a Haqqani Network commander in Khost province, then taken hostage for nearly nine months. The journalist is reported to have escaped from a Haqqani Network compound in North Waziristan and rescued by Pakistani Frontier Corps troops.
The soldier is probably not in Afghanistan, a US intelligence official familiar with the search told The Long War Journal. The official believes the soldier has been moved into a Haqqani Network safe house in the Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan in Pakistan.
The Haqqani Network has moved hostages across the border in the past. The most recent and high-profile case involved a US reporter from the New York Times, who was lured into meeting a Haqqani Network commander in Khost province, then taken hostage for nearly nine months. The journalist is reported to have escaped from a Haqqani Network compound in North Waziristan and rescued by Pakistani Frontier Corps troops.
Note: the photo for this story is the actual flyer the U.S. is distributing in Afghanistan hoping to get tips on the soldier's whereabouts.
The one part of this article that I think deserves special note of is the revelation by the Haqqani spokesman that the fate of the soldier will actually be left up to Mullah Omar. That's quite an admission. Because this now means that the U.S. can pin anything that happens to this U.S. soldier on the supreme leader of the Taliban. Remember, we have had our Commander-in-Chief make statements that he would like to perhaps sit down and talk with "moderate" elements of the Taliban and from my recollection, Mullah Omar has refused every single effort for anyone to ever negotiate the fate of Afghanistan or the end of fighting.
It's going to be intriguing to see if Mullah Omar will use this chance to make the ultimate defiant gesture to kill our soldier or, if he is a bit wiser man, he realizes that if he takes that extreme measure, he will more than likely see a rain of retribution come down on his forces by U.S. troops. One thing to consider is the current "surge" of American troops in southern Afghanistan - Omar knows that the heat has been turned up and he may feel that this hostage could be used to stop that....and perhaps he wants to test the backbone of America's new President.
We continue to pray for the rescue of this American soldier...but folks, prepare for the worst. Mullah Omar is ruthless and demented. If he carries out the execution of our boy, may no man or woman in America rest until Mullah Omar himself is captured and dealt with in a just manner (and that doesn't mean a trial, for those new to this site).
The one part of this article that I think deserves special note of is the revelation by the Haqqani spokesman that the fate of the soldier will actually be left up to Mullah Omar. That's quite an admission. Because this now means that the U.S. can pin anything that happens to this U.S. soldier on the supreme leader of the Taliban. Remember, we have had our Commander-in-Chief make statements that he would like to perhaps sit down and talk with "moderate" elements of the Taliban and from my recollection, Mullah Omar has refused every single effort for anyone to ever negotiate the fate of Afghanistan or the end of fighting.
It's going to be intriguing to see if Mullah Omar will use this chance to make the ultimate defiant gesture to kill our soldier or, if he is a bit wiser man, he realizes that if he takes that extreme measure, he will more than likely see a rain of retribution come down on his forces by U.S. troops. One thing to consider is the current "surge" of American troops in southern Afghanistan - Omar knows that the heat has been turned up and he may feel that this hostage could be used to stop that....and perhaps he wants to test the backbone of America's new President.
We continue to pray for the rescue of this American soldier...but folks, prepare for the worst. Mullah Omar is ruthless and demented. If he carries out the execution of our boy, may no man or woman in America rest until Mullah Omar himself is captured and dealt with in a just manner (and that doesn't mean a trial, for those new to this site).
Haqqani Network threatens to execute captured US soldier
A senior commander in the Haqqani Network has threatened to kill a captured US soldier unless Coalition forces end operations in two districts in Paktika and Ghazni provinces in eastern Afghanistan.
Abdullah Jalali, a spokesman for Mullah Sangeen Zadran, who claimed to have captured the soldier in late June, said the US military must end the search operations in the Giro district in Ghazni province and the Khoshamand district in Paktika or the soldier would be killed. Jalali made the statement in a telephone interview with the Associated Press.
But Jalali also said the fate of the soldier will ultimately be decided by Mullah Omar, the overall leader of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The US military has launched an intensive operation in eastern Afghanistan in an effort to recover the soldier, who went missing on June 30 after leaving a small combat outpost in Paktika province along with three Afghan soldiers. The US has designated one platoon per battalion throughout the eastern theater to search for the soldier, who has not been named.
The US military has continued operations in Paktika and Ghazni. Just last night, US and Afghan forces captured nine Haqqani Network fighters during raids in Paktika and neighboring Khost province, another Haqqani Network stronghold. Combined forces also detained a Haqqani Network fighter in Ghazni province on July 12.
The Haqqani Network took credit for capturing the soldier and Sangeen said he was willing to conduct "a prisoner exchange" as terms of the release. The group claimed the US soldier was drunk.
"Five days ago, a drunken American soldier who had come out of his garrison named Malakh, was captured by mujahedeen," stated a Taliban website. "He is still with mujahedeen."
The soldier is probably not in Afghanistan, a US intelligence official familiar with the search told The Long War Journal. The official believes the soldier has been moved into a Haqqani Network safe house in the Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan in Pakistan.
The Haqqani Network has moved hostages across the border in the past. The most recent and high-profile case involved a US reporter from the New York Times, who was lured into meeting a Haqqani Network commander in Khost province, then taken hostage for nearly nine months. The journalist is reported to have escaped from a Haqqani Network compound in North Waziristan and rescued by Pakistani Frontier Corps troops.
The Haqqani Network is considered one of the most dangerous in Afghanistan
The US military has been targeting the Haqqani Network in Afghanistan and across the border in Pakistan since early 2008. US special operations forces have targeted the Haqqani leadership in multiple raids in Afghanistan, while the CIA has conducted a covert Predator air campaign against the network across the border in North Waziristan. Nearly half of the US predator strikes in Pakistan during 2008 were aimed at the Haqqani Network and at al Qaeda leaders sheltering in their tribal areas.
"We want the Haqqanis to know we will hit them anywhere," a senior US military intelligence official told The Long War Journal after the Sept. 8 strike on the Haqqani madrassa, known as the Manba Ulom.
The Manba Ulom madrassa was established by Jalaluddin Haqqani, the family patriarch who has close ties with Osama bin Laden. The madrassa was used in the 1980s to train mujahedeen to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. After the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Haqqani family used the Manba Ulom madrassa as a training center and meeting place for senior al Qaeda leaders.
The Pakistani government closed the madrassa in 2002, but it was reopened in 2004. Since then, Taliban fighters and members of al Qaeda's network are known to shelter in the madrassa compound.
The madrassa serves as the headquarters for the Haqqani Network, while the network's forward operating command center in Afghanistan is located in the village of Zambar in the northern Sabari district of Khost province, Afghanistan. The network is active in the Afghan provinces of Khost, Paktia, Paktika, Ghazni, Logar, Wardak, and Kabul, and provides support to Taliban networks in Kunar, Nangarhar, Helmand, and Kandahar provinces.
The Haqqanis have extensive links with al Qaeda and with Pakistan’s military intelligence agency, the Inter-Service Intelligence, or ISI. This relationship has allowed the Haqqani network to survive and thrive in North Waziristan. The Haqqanis control large swaths of North Waziristan, and run a parallel administration with courts, recruiting centers, tax offices, and security forces.
Siraj Haqqani, a son of Jalaluddin, has risen in prominence over the past two years. He is believed to be the mastermind of the most deadly attacks inside Afghanistan, and to be the senior military commander in eastern Afghanistan. The US military has described Siraj as the primary threat to security in eastern Afghanistan. On March 25, the US Department of State put a $5 million bounty out for information leading to the capture of Siraj.
Siraj is believed to be dangerous not only for his connections with the Afghan Taliban, but with al Qaeda's central leadership. His connections extend all the way to Osama bin Laden. Siraj actively recruits foreigners into the network and trains them to conduct suicide attacks in Afghanistan.
Just as the US has finally admitted that Taliban leader Mullah Omar and his senior commanders are running their Afghan operations from Quetta in Pakistan, the Haqqanis have been labeled as operating from Pakistan's tribal areas.
"The Haqqani network remains one of the most lethal Taliban organizations operating out of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas," the US military admitted in its latest press release.
Operations against the Haqqanis have intensified over the past two months
The US military has heavily targeted the Haqqani Network over the past two months. Siraj and Sangeen have been directly targeted during raids and strikes in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
On May 28, US and Afghan forces assaulted a heavily defended fort in the mountains in the Wor Mamay district in the eastern province of Paktika near the Pakistani border. Twenty-nine Haqqani Network fighters, including six failed suicide bombers, were killed during the raid. Sangeen, who was the target of the raid, escaped.
Siraj and Sangeen were also the targets of recent US airstrikes in South Waziristan in June. Several strikes occurred after the US received information that Siraj was attending a high-level al Qaeda and Taliban meeting to advise a Pakistani Taliban leader on his options against the Pakistani military [see LWJ report Senior Taliban leaders targeted in yesterday's Predator strikes]. In another strike, Sangeen, Baitullah Mehsud, and his deputy Qari Hussain Mehsud, were targeted at the funeral of a mid-level Taliban commander in South Waziristan.
1 comment:
http://political-marketing.net/forum/index.php
Definition
Marketing activities designed to influence about political issues, particular candidates for public office, or public issues and mind set of general public, politically called voters. Although political marketing uses many of the same techniques that other forms of marketing do, it is actually used to promote a concept or an idea, rather than a specific product or service, and to motivate people to vote for that idea.
Scope
Generally all type of marketing activities is focused on self-interest, but that in politics is focused on the common good and public interest. Political marketing is beneficial for both, the leaders and voters. Political marketing is an effective key to success, by practicing specific marketing techniques we can build public image of specific leader. The scope of Political marketing is not narrow, to increase number of voters, it also includes to make new and existing voters more loyal to their party and leaders.
We offer political consultancy to political parties and political leaders to make a best election campaign services for Political Marketing and Consulting in Asia. We Guarantee for success in election for a party or a person. Political Consulting must be started at least two years before election to get good results. if you are a party leader or a Political personality and or a association, and if you want to get political consultation just contact me and i will do the rest. For more information please visit
http://www.political-marketing.net
Post a Comment